ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0691

Structural Differences Exist in Beta-2-Glycoprotein I from APS Patients Compared to Healthy Controls

Hannah Britt1, Hannah Bradford1, Valentina Spiteri1, Anisur Rahman2, Ian Giles1, Mihaela Delcea3, Paul Dalby1, Kostas Thalassinos1 and Thomas McDonnell1, 1University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 3University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: antiphospholipid syndrome, Autoantibody(ies), Structure

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Beta-2-Glycoprotein I (B2GPI) is a serum protein of approximately 50kDa and is the main autoantigen of Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Antibodies to B2GPI (aB2GPI) are diagnostic of APS and are strongly associated with clinical events including thrombosis. B2GPI can adopt one of two structures, a circular closed structure or a linear open structure. It is proposed that these structures have different functions and thus alter disease pathogenesis. The structure of B2GPI in APS patients is poorly characterized. Here we present data comparing structure and antibody-binding properties of b2GPI from patients with APS and healthy controls (HC), delineating the structural differences in B2GPI within APS patients compared to healthy controls and how that affects binding of autoantibodies.

Methods: B2GPI was purified from APS and HC plasma by affinity chromatography and PEG precipitation avoiding acid steps. Samples were analysed by ion mobility-mass spectrometry on a Waters SELECT SERIES cIMS to assess structure, and increasing voltage was applied to investigate structural dynamics. Data were processed using MassLynx v4.2 (Waters). Antibody activity was tested by inhibition ELISA, briefly: serum from APS patients was incubated in the presence or absence of either HC or APS B2GPI and then used in a B2GPI ELISA to assess the fluid phase inhibition of anti-B2GPI antibodies.

Results: Similar glycoisoforms of B2GPI were seen in HC and APS B2GPI. A different distribution of the two known structures was seen, with APS patients displaying more linear B2GPI compared to healthy controls at the same charge state. When voltage was applied to the linear form of B2GPI from HC, the protein was capable of adopting a more compact form again, however this was not possible for APS B2GPI. In an inhibition ELISA APS B2GPI from high aB2GPI positive patients (n=2) inhibited binding of anti-B2GPI antibodies to B2GPI significantly more than HC (19.1%vs13.5%, p=0.007).

Conclusion: Structural differences exist in APS patients compared to controls, with more linear B2GPI in patients and this may be explained by differences in the structural dynamics. Furthermore these structural differences are associated with better antibody binding which may suggest that this structural difference plays a role in autoantibody production in APS.

Supporting image 1

Fig.1: STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES EXIST IN BETA_2-GLYCOPROTEIN I FROM APS PATIENTS COMPARED TO HEALTHY CONTROLS
Panel A shows the distribution of B2GPI structures in healthy controls (top) and APS patients (bottom) at a single charge state. As can be seen the peaks are reversed with increased amounts of linear B2GPI shown in the APS samples (peak arrival ~67.5ms) and the inverse for the circular form (arrival time ~ 62.5ms). In panel B, when the linear form from healthy controls (Top) was then subjected to increased voltage, as can be seen the linear peak (~67.5ms) can form another peak equivalent to the circular form (~62.5ms) before progression to a superlinear form. In contrast, APS patients (Bottom) are not capable of this and progress to a superlinear form. Finally, Panel C shows blinding remaining in an anti-B2GPI ELISA using 10 APS patients serum challenged with either APS purified B2GPI (n=2) or HC B2GPI (Pooled). As can be seen APS B2GPI inhibits significantly better than healthy control equivalent.


Disclosures: H. Britt, None; H. Bradford, None; V. Spiteri, None; A. Rahman, None; I. Giles, UCB; M. Delcea, None; P. Dalby, None; K. Thalassinos, None; T. McDonnell, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Britt H, Bradford H, Spiteri V, Rahman A, Giles I, Delcea M, Dalby P, Thalassinos K, McDonnell T. Structural Differences Exist in Beta-2-Glycoprotein I from APS Patients Compared to Healthy Controls [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/structural-differences-exist-in-beta-2-glycoprotein-i-from-aps-patients-compared-to-healthy-controls/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/structural-differences-exist-in-beta-2-glycoprotein-i-from-aps-patients-compared-to-healthy-controls/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology