ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1080

Stroke Risks Among U.S. Medicaid Recipients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, 2000-2006: Racial and Ethnic Variation

Medha Barbhaiya1, Jose A Gomez-Puerta2, Hongshu Guan3, Daniel H. Solomon1, Joanne M. Foody4, Graciela S. Alarcon5 and Karen H. Costenbader1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Boston, MA, 3Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 5Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus, SLE and cerebrovascular disease

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health (ACR): Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Outcomes

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

SLE patients are at increased stroke risk, but racial/ethnic variation in risk has not been examined in a population-based study. We examined risks by race/ethnicity among SLE patients in Medicaid, the US medical insurance program for the poor. We investigated whether differential loss to follow-up and variation in mortality between racial/ethnic groups influenced Cox regression model estimates.

Methods

From the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) 2000-2006, containing all billing claims for patients from 47 U.S. states and Washington D.C., we identified patients 18-65 with prevalent SLE (≥3 SLE ICD-9 codes of 710.0, >30 days apart) and/or lupus nephritis (additional >2 codes for nephritis, renal insufficiency or failure). The index date was the date when SLE or lupus nephritis definition was met. We extracted age, sex, US region, calendar year, zip code area-based socioeconomic status (SES). Baseline comorbidities and SLE-specific risk index (Ward M, J Rheum, 2000) were from ICD-9 and CPT codes until index date. Within inpatient claims, ICD-9 codes identified fatal and non-fatal, ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes (PPV 83%, Andrade SE, Pharmacoepi Drug Saf, 2012). Stroke incidence rates (IR) per 1,000 person-years with 95% CIs were calculated for each racial/ethnic group. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models calculated cause-specific hazard ratios (HRcs) for stroke from index date through end of follow-up, censoring for death or loss to Medicaid follow-up, adjusting for covariates (Table). We also used Fine and Gray proportional hazards models to calculate subdistribution HRs (HRsd), accounting for competing risks of death and loss to follow-up, adjusting for the same covariates.

Results

Of 42,221 SLE patients, 39,320 (93%) were female and 6,467 (15%) had lupus nephritis. Mean age at baseline was 38.13 (SD 12.29); 38% lived in the South, 23% in the West, 20% in the Northeast and 20% in the Midwest. Blacks represented 40%, Whites 38%, Hispanics 15%, Asian 5%, and Native Americans 2%. IRs were 10.02 (95% CI 9.44-10.64) per 1,000 person-years for all SLE patients, and 17.03 (95%CI 15.11-19.20) per 1,000 person-years for all lupus nephritis patients. After multivariable adjustment, Blacks had higher stroke risks (HRcs 1.31) than Whites. (Table) This risk remained similarly elevated in competing risks models (multivariable HRsd 1.36). Among lupus nephritis patients, stroke risks among Blacks vs. Whites were also high (multivariable HRsd 1.57). Stroke risks among other racial/ethnic groups did not significantly differ from those in White patients. 

Conclusion

Among US Medicaid SLE and lupus nephritis patients, stroke IRs were high. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, Blacks compared to Whites with SLE had 36% increased risks and those with lupus nephritis had 57% increased risks. Accounting for competing risks did not substantially affect these estimates.

Table. Incidence Rates and Adjusted Subdistribution Hazard Ratios for Stroke Hospitalization among Medicaid patients with SLE in the US, from 2000-2006, by Race and Ethnicity

Race/Ethnicity

Total individuals

Number of events

Person-years

IR* (95% CI)

Multivariable-Adjusted Proportional Hazards

HRcs

(95% CI)¥

HRsd

(95% CI)¥

White

16,219

352

40,204

8.76 (7.89-9.72)

1.0 (Ref)

1.0 (Ref)

Black

16,956

538

42,091

12.78 (11.74-13.91)

1.32 (1.18-1.48)

1.36 (1.17-1.59)

Asian

1,880

41

5,525

7.42 (5.46-10.08)

1.14 (0.87-1.50)

1.26 (0.89-1.80)

Hispanic

6,489

114

16,495

6.91 (5.75-8.30)

1.01 (0.85-1.20)

0.95 (0.75-1.20)

Native American

677

17

1,653

10.29 (6.40-16.55)

1.32 (0.90-1.93)

1.38 (0.82-2.33)

*IR=Incidence rate, events per 1,000 person-years.
¥HRcs=Cause-specific hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards model; HRsd=Sub-distribution hazard ratio from Fine and Gray proportional hazards competing risks model. Multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, U.S. region of residence, calendar year, area-based SES, and baseline comorbidities (including history of angina, coronary artery bypass graft, coronary atherosclerosis, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertension, smoking, obesity) and SLE-specific risk adjustment index.


Disclosure:

M. Barbhaiya,
None;

J. A. Gomez-Puerta,
None;

H. Guan,
None;

D. H. Solomon,
None;

J. M. Foody,
None;

G. S. Alarcon,
None;

K. H. Costenbader,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/stroke-risks-among-u-s-medicaid-recipients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-2000-2006-racial-and-ethnic-variation/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology