ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2236

Strength Training for People with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Barriers, Facilitators, and Tailoring Considerations

Jasmin Ma1, Jon Collins 2, Eileen Davidson 2, Kelly English 3, Alison Hoens 4, Karen Tsui 5, Shanon McQuitty 2, Louella Sequeira 3 and Linda Li 4, 1Arthritis Research Canada/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, Canada, 3Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, 4University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Arthritis Patient Advisory Board, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: muscle strength and physical activity, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II: Patient Preferences, Beliefs, & Experiences

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Strength training (ST) rates in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are remarkably low (1-14%), reducing the potential health benefits of ST for this population (e.g., decreased fatigue, pain, muscle wasting, and inflammation). Compared to studies of factors that affect physical activity more broadly, studies on factors that affect ST in the general population are sparse; these studies are non-existent in RA. The purpose of this study was to examine patient-identified barriers, facilitators, and tailoring considerations for designing interventions to improve ST participation among people with RA.

Methods: Purposive sampling was used to include people with varying age (< /=40 vs >40), gender (male vs female), geographic location (rural vs urban), ST experience (none, less than the general population guidelines, meeting or exceeding the guidelines), and perceived RA severity (well-controlled/mild, moderate, severe). Semi-structured interview questions were co-developed with nine patient partners. Questions were iteratively modified to reflect new knowledge gleaned from interviews that were coded at mid-way points throughout data collection. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We performed inductive thematic coding with the de-identified interview transcripts. Peer checking amongst researchers and patient partners was conducted to ensure credibility. We continued the interviews until content saturation was reached in the analysis.

Results: 13 participants were recruited through social media and email advertising across Canada (age range=25-70, male=3, rural=2, no ST experience=5, moderate-severe self-reported RA severity=6). Participants identified two barriers that were unique to the RA population. First, cognitive demand was an important barrier that was exacerbated by both disease/medication side-effects (e.g., ‘brain fog’ and poor memory) and increased focus required to perform ST compared to aerobic exercise (e.g., counting sets, reps, remembering the individual exercises and their techniques). Second, participants identified a knowledge gap in how much ST can be safely performed given their disease and how to distinguish between ST pain and RA pain. Several participants suggested the use of memory aids (e.g., videos, written programs) could assist in clarifying the steps to performing ST. Many also felt that RA-specific ST guidelines would be useful to improve understanding of how much ST is appropriate.  When developing tailored programs, participants highlighted the need to understand their unique situation by probing for goals, motivators, barriers, available time and resources, abilities and limitations, and preferred environment, activities and communication style.

Conclusion: Our results revealed challenges to ST that were unique to people with RA. Participants also identified potential opportunities for developing tailored interventions for supporting ST participation. These findings have also provided a foundation for testing hypotheses that explore the mechanisms for improving ST behaviour in this population.


Disclosure: J. Ma, None; J. Collins, None; E. Davidson, None; K. English, None; A. Hoens, None; K. Tsui, None; S. McQuitty, None; L. Sequeira, None; L. Li, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ma J, Collins J, Davidson E, English K, Hoens A, Tsui K, McQuitty S, Sequeira L, Li L. Strength Training for People with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Barriers, Facilitators, and Tailoring Considerations [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/strength-training-for-people-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-barriers-facilitators-and-tailoring-considerations/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/strength-training-for-people-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-barriers-facilitators-and-tailoring-considerations/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology