ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0660

Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Gout – a Comparison Among Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin

Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos1, Christine Peloquin2, Seoyoung Kim3 and Tuhina Neogi2, 1Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) are anti-diabetic drugs that have a urate-lowering effect. SGLT2-i had a more favorable impact on gout risk than glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. In a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), canagliflozin, a SGLT2-i, decreased risk of gout that seemed to be more than may be expected by serum urate reduction, suggesting potential anti-inflammatory effects beyond urate reduction. In-vitro, canagliflozin, but not dapagliflozin or empagliflozin, activated AMPK and suppressed IL-1β stimulated secretion of IL-6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). However, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin activated AMPK in other studies. Whether there may be differences in gout risk between SGLT2-i’s is not known.

Methods: We performed a cohort study using data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a UK general practitioner (GP) electronic health records (EHR) database. We included subjects aged 18–89 with type 2 diabetes mellitus and incident use of a SGLT2-i (canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin) between 01/01/2013 and 12/ 31/2018 who had been enrolled in the GP practice for 6 months prior to study entry. We excluded individuals with gout diagnosis (Read code), use of gout medications (allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, sulfinpyrazone, or colchicine) or without body mass index assessment prior to SGLT2-i initiation. Follow-up started from the index date (date of first SGLT2-i prescription) and continued until incident gout diagnosis (diagnostic Read code or prescription of gout medications), switch to another SGLT2-i, death, or end of study. We compared the risk of developing gout across the 3 SGLT2-i’s using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: Of 22,049 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, there were 3,287 incident users of canagliflozin, 12,504 incident users of dapagliflozin and 6,258 incident users of empagliflozin. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. After adjusting for potential confounders, canagliflozin had 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.18 to 2.09) times the risk of developing gout, while empagliflozin had 0.81 (95% CI 0.59–1.11) times the risk compared with dapagliflozin, although the latter the effect estimate was not statistically significant (Table 2).

Conclusion: While SGLT2-i agents as a class and canagliflozin in particular have been shown to reduce the risk of gout in prior studies, in this cohort study from a UK EHR database, the beneficial effects appeared to be strongest for dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, with no significant differences noted between the two of them. Although canagliflozin reduced risk of gout compared with placebo in a RCT, in these data, it had a less favorable effect than dapagliflozin. The clinical relevance of the in vitro data on the potential anti-inflammatory effects of the various agents in this drug class is not clear.

*Chronic kidney disease (CKD) defined as CKD stage 4, CKD stage 5, or renal replacement therapy (dialysis or transplant). BMI: body mass index; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; NSAID: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; SD: standard deviation.

* Potential confounders (assessed at baseline) included in the adjusted hazards ratio model: 1) general (age, gender, body mass index); 2) duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus; 3) complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (diabetic nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy); 4) comorbidities (chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease); 5) medication use (diuretics, insulin, losartan, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug). CI: confidence interval; SGLT2-i: sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors.


Disclosure: A. Vargas-Santos, Abbvie, 8; C. Peloquin, None; S. Kim, Pfizer, 1, Roche, 1, AbbVie, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1; T. Neogi, Lilly, 1, EMD Merck Serono, 1, Novartis, 1, Regeneron, 1, Pfizer/Lilly, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vargas-Santos A, Peloquin C, Kim S, Neogi T. Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Gout – a Comparison Among Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sodium-glucose-co-transporter-2-inhibitors-and-the-risk-for-gout-a-comparison-among-canagliflozin-dapagliflozin-and-empagliflozin/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sodium-glucose-co-transporter-2-inhibitors-and-the-risk-for-gout-a-comparison-among-canagliflozin-dapagliflozin-and-empagliflozin/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology