ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 846

Social Support in Couples-Focused Physical Activity Interventions for People with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: What Kinds of Partner Support Are Associated with Increases in Physical Activity and Reductions in Sedentary Behavior?

Christine Rini1, Liubov Arbeeva2, Stephanie Bahorski2, Cynthia Khan3, Rebekah Layton2, Derek Hales2, Julie Upchurch2, Shelby Rimmler2, Ida Griesemer2, Mary Altpeter2, Dana Carthron4, Todd Schwartz2 and Leigh F. Callahan5, 1Biomedical Research, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, 2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 3Econometrica, Inc., Bethesda, MD, 4Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 5Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Intervention, physical activity and social support

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: ARHP Psychosocial Impact on Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Physical activity (PA) reduces joint symptoms in people with osteoarthritis (PWOA), but most PWOA get insufficient PA. They would benefit from small but sustained increases in PA, but PA interventions usually elicit short-lived increases. Social support is a reliable predictor of PA, and partners (e.g., a spouse) can provide support that helps PWOAs make lasting increases in PA (e.g., by providing encouragement or joining in PA). Yet, partner support may also fail to provide intended resources (i.e., PWOAs may appraise it as “ineffective”–a poor match for their need for a certain quality and quantity of support). Partners may also provide solicitous support that hinders behavior change (e.g., well-intentioned discouragement of activity in favor of rest). The purpose of this dyadic study was to examine these aspects of partner support for PA, as reported by PWOA (“support received”) and their partner (“support provided”).

Methods: 173 couples, with PWOAs who had hip or knee OA and were insufficiently active, completed a couples-focused PA intervention with 3-hours of in-person education and 12-weeks of workbook activities. They also completed questionnaires and wore accelerometers at baseline and at 1-week and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-intervention. We used multilevel modeling to examine support received and provided as predictors of PWOAs’ moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) and sedentary behavior across these timepoints.

Results: Models adjusted for sociodemographic covariates revealed that PWOAs’ MVPA at each timepoint was higher for PWOAs who reported receiving more encouragement for PA from their partner (p<.01) and those who reported that their partner joined in their PA (p =.02). PWOAs’ MPVA was also higher when partners reported joining in their PA (p=.03). PWOAs’ appraised effectiveness of this support did not moderate its association with MVPA, nor were partners’ solicitous behaviors (as reported by PWOAs or partners) associated with MVPA. In addition, an interaction showed a negative association between partner-reported solicitous support and PWOA sedentary behavior when PWOAs appraised this support as relatively ineffective (i.e., a poor match for their needs). This association was attenuated among PWOAs who appraised the effectiveness of their partner’s solicitous support more favorably (i.e., a better match for their needs; p=.02). A similar interaction occurred for partner-provided joining in PA (p=.048).

Conclusion: These findings highlight different pathways by which to change MVPA and sedentary behavior and have implications for designing couples-based PA interventions that elicit lasting behavior change that thus ensure that PWOAs get the health benefits of PA.


Disclosure: C. Rini, None; L. Arbeeva, None; S. Bahorski, None; C. Khan, None; R. Layton, None; D. Hales, None; J. Upchurch, None; S. Rimmler, None; I. Griesemer, None; M. Altpeter, None; D. Carthron, None; T. Schwartz, None; L. F. Callahan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rini C, Arbeeva L, Bahorski S, Khan C, Layton R, Hales D, Upchurch J, Rimmler S, Griesemer I, Altpeter M, Carthron D, Schwartz T, Callahan LF. Social Support in Couples-Focused Physical Activity Interventions for People with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: What Kinds of Partner Support Are Associated with Increases in Physical Activity and Reductions in Sedentary Behavior? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/social-support-in-couples-focused-physical-activity-interventions-for-people-with-hip-or-knee-osteoarthritis-what-kinds-of-partner-support-are-associated-with-increases-in-physical-activity-and/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/social-support-in-couples-focused-physical-activity-interventions-for-people-with-hip-or-knee-osteoarthritis-what-kinds-of-partner-support-are-associated-with-increases-in-physical-activity-and/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology