ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1526

Shift Analysis of Spinal Radiographic Progression after 2 Years of Secukinumab in Ankylosing Spondylitis – Detailed Results from a Phase 3 Trial

Xenofon Baraliakos1, Jürgen Braun1, Albert Widmer2, Ayan Das Gupta3, Aimee Readie4, Brian Porter4 and Corine Gaillez2, 1Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany, 2Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 3Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India, 4Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), modified stoke ankylosing spondylitis spinal score (MSASSS) and x-ray

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: An overall low rate of spinal radiographic progression with the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) was reported with secukinumab (SEC), a fully human interleukin 17A (IL-17A) inhibitor in the 2-year (2y) uncontrolled ankylosing spondylitis (AS) MEASURE 1 study (1). The objective of this analysis was to investigate those patients whose mSASSS either increased or decreased at 2 yr (Wk 104) in more detail.

Methods: In the MEASURE 1 trial patients received subcutaneous SEC 75mg or 150mg or placebo (PBO) every 4 weeks up to 2 years. Analysis of radiographic progression of the cervical and lumbar spine was performed in X-ray completers using mean mSASSS of two experienced readers blinded to time sequence of the images. To supplement the established published analysis we now performed an analysis using only vertebral edges (VE) scores where both readers were in agreement, and the scores of the initial PBO group were merged and included in the analysis. Progression in mSASSS at 2y vs. baseline (BL) was defined by a change of >1.838 (smallest detectable change, SDC), while ‘improvement’ was defined by < -1.838 and no change by ‑1.838 to 1.838. Furthermore, a shift analysis was performed to explore the course of radiographic progression based on the occurrence of syndesmophytes, evaluating an increase of an mSASSS of 0 or 1 to 2 or 3 vs. a decrease in mSASSS from 2 or 3 to 1 or 0 on single VE from BL to 2y.

Results: A total of 257 patients were X-ray completers at Wk104. Overall, 13.2% patients showed an increase and 6.2% patients showed a decrease of mSASSS as defined. BL demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with mSASSS progression, ‘improvement’ and stable scores were similar.

A total of 4947 VE could be analyzed. No mSASSS change to Wk104 was seen in 4891/4947 (98.9%) VEs, mSASSS increase in 46/4947 (0.9%) VEs and mSASSS decreased in 10/4947 (0.2%) VEs. Of interest, in 9 out of 10 VEs with an mSASSS decrease at Wk104, a change of -2 or -3 was recorded.

Overall, 4291 VEs had no syndesmophytes (86.7%) and 656 VEs (13.3%) had syndesmophytes at BL. Development of a new syndesmophyte was seen in 32/4291 (0.7%) VEs whereas 9/656 VEs syndesmophytes at BL (1.4%) were no longer detected at Wk104. An increase of mSASSS to 2 or 3 was found in 13 out of 173 VEs (0.08%) with an mSASSS score 1 or 2 at BL.

Conclusion: This detailed exploratory analysis at the vertebral unit level complements the previous analysis (1) based on adjudicated scores from blinded readers. This analysis shows that the radiographic status remained stable in almost 99% of VEs in secukinumab-treated patients. The previously reported proportion of patients showing a decrease in mSASSS change is confirmed by the scores at the VE level. Since this is most probably due to background noise it requires further investigation which may include a reevaluation of images. Only the mSASSS at BL was predictive of radiographic progression. These findings may influence future radiographic studies and analyses.

References: 1. Braun J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1070-1077


Disclosure: X. Baraliakos, None; J. Braun, Abbott, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma, 5,Abbott, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma, 2; A. Widmer, Novartis AG, 3; A. Das Gupta, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 3; A. Readie, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 3; B. Porter, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 1,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 3; C. Gaillez, Novartis Pharma AG, BMS, 1,Novartis Pharma AG, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Baraliakos X, Braun J, Widmer A, Das Gupta A, Readie A, Porter B, Gaillez C. Shift Analysis of Spinal Radiographic Progression after 2 Years of Secukinumab in Ankylosing Spondylitis – Detailed Results from a Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/shift-analysis-of-spinal-radiographic-progression-after-2-years-of-secukinumab-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-detailed-results-from-a-phase-3-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/shift-analysis-of-spinal-radiographic-progression-after-2-years-of-secukinumab-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-detailed-results-from-a-phase-3-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology