ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2600

Shear Wave Elastography:  A Novel Quantitative Approach For Evaluating Scleroderma Skin

Ingeborg Sacksen1, Mark H. Wener2, P. Scott Pollock3 and Manjiri K. Dighe4, 1Rheumatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Rheumatology & Lab Med, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 3Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud’s - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multi-system disease with both visceral and cutaneous fibrosis. Dermal elasticity is reduced and stiffness increased due to excessive dermal and subcutaneous deposition of collagen leading to increased skin thickness as well as hardening and tightening of the skin. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is an emerging, operator-independent technique, which can obtain quantitative stiffness values. We describe a novel quantitative approach for evaluating the skin in scleroderma using shear wave elastography

Methods: We evaluated the skin of thirteen patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis and ten healthy controls using an Aixplorer shear wave ultrasound instrument (SupersonicImagine, Bothell, WA). Each patient underwent a SWE exam of the right arm at multiple sites (3rd finger, extensor forearm, upper arm), sternum, and face. The images consist of a spectrum of translucent colored bands superimposed on B-mode ultrasonographic images indicative of soft and highly elastic tissue to hard and minimally elastic tissue.  The mean stiffness values of skin (measured in kPa units) were obtained at each site by averaging 3 measurements made per image obtained.

Results: The skin of seven men and five women with diffuse systemic sclerosis as well as 10 healthy controls was evaluated.  The mean and 1SD SWE stiffness measures were (in kPa):  finger –SSc 98.3 (SD-56) vs control – 32.1, (SD- 11.8); forearm – SSc 89.6 (SD- 58.9) vs control – 18.3 (SD-6.9), upper arm – SSc 34.5 (SD-19.2) vs control 17.7(SD8.6), face: SSc 19.3 (SD-17.7) vs control 8.4(SD-2.7), chest –SSc 23.6 (SD-17.1) vs control 10.9(SD-6.0).  Maximum (out of range high) values of 300kPA were obtained for 1 patient at the finger and two patients at the forearm. Two-tailed t –tests were performed between the means of patients and controls at each site. Statistical significance (p<0.01) was achieved at the finger, forearm, all sites combined, and (p<0.05) at the upper arm.  Statistical significance was not reached for the chest (p=0.056) and the face (p=0.08).  Z scores (based on the mean and SD of each site in controls) were calculated for patient measurements at each individual site and combined sites compared to controls.  Z scores at all sites were above the mean for controls (see figure 1).

Conclusion:   Shear wave elastography is a valid and feasible quantitative method for assessing abnormal elasticity of the skin in scleroderma patients. It adds a new dimension to the assessment of skin involvement in SSc, and is an objective, non-invasive tool for potential use in clinical trials.  Studies comparing its performance to stage of disease, skin thickness, and mRss are ongoing.


Disclosure:

I. Sacksen,
None;

M. H. Wener,
None;

P. S. Pollock,
None;

M. K. Dighe,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/shear-wave-elastography-a-novel-quantitative-approach-for-evaluating-scleroderma-skin/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology