ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1803

Serum Adipocyte Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Level Is Elevated in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) but Not Associated with Biophysical Markers of Cardiovascular Disease

Anselm Mak1,2, Herbert Schwarz3, Nien Yee Kow2, Sen Hee Tay4 and Lieng Hsi Ling2,5, 1National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore, 2Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 3Physiology, National Unversity of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 4National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 5National Unversity Heart Centre Singapore, National Unversity Health System, Singapore, Singapore

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Adipocytokines, cardiovascular disease and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (aFABP) is an intracellular lipid-binding protein expressed in adipocytes and macrophages, particularly in inflammatory conditions. Recently, high circulating serum aFABP levels have been shown to predict the development of metabolic syndrome, atherosclerosis and ischaemic stroke. Being an inflammatory disease, circulating aFABP level is expected to be raised in patients with SLE. However, a recent study failed to demonstrate higher aFABP levels in SLE patients than in healthy controls (HC), likely due to the lack of power of the study and optimally matched HC. Here, we aimed to address if serum aFABP level is indeed higher in SLE patients by comparing a larger number of SLE patients with HC stringently matched for age, sex and BMI. In addition, potential associations between serum aFABP levels and clinical and disease-related factors, as well as biophysical markers of cardiovascular (CVS) disease were explored in SLE patients.

Methods: Adult patients who fulfilled the 2012 SLICC classification criteria for SLE and HC matched for age, gender and BMI were recruited. Subjects with a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, CVS and cerebrovascular diseases, and those who were on statins were excluded. Clinical parameters including daily prednisolone dose, SLEDAI, SLICC/DI, and serum C3, C4, anti-dsDNA, total cholesterol (TC) and HDL-c levels were obtained. Serum aFABP levels were determined by ELISA. Endothelial function, arterial stiffness and carotid atherosclerosis were assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), pulse-wave velocity (PWV) and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) respectively using the Prosound Alpha-10 ultrasound system. Relationships between serum aFABP levels and disease-related factors, FMD, PWV and cIMT were explored by bivariate correlations.

Results:

Seventy one SLE patients and 71 matched HC (6 men in each group) were studied. The mean±SD age (year), BMI and atherogenic index (TC/HDL-c) of SLE patients and HC were 39.21±13.4 and 40.37±12.9, 22.06±4.3 and 22.86±4.2 and 3.09±1.6 and 3.22±1.4 (p=0.611) respectively. In SLE patients, the mean±SD daily prednisolone dose, SLEDAI and SLICC/DI were 13.43±14.4mg, 6.52±5.4 and 0.17±0.4 respectively. SLE patients had significantly lower FMD than HC (3.82±2.9% vs 4.76±3.0%, p=0.027). PWV and cIMT did not differ between both groups (p=0.739 and p=0.762, respectively). Serum aFABP was significantly higher in SLE patients than that in HC (14.82±3.3ng/ml vs. 13.69±4.6ng/ml, p<0.001). However, no association between serum aFABP levels and serum C3, C4 and anti-dsDNA levels, SLEDAI, SLICC/DI, BMI, atherogenic index, daily prednisolone dose, FMD, PWV and cIMT was found in the SLE group. In HC, no association was noted between serum aFABP levels and BMI, FMD, PWV, cIMT and atherogenic index.  

Conclusion:

While we confirmed that SLE patients had significantly higher aFABP levels and lower FMD than age, sex-, and BMI-matched HC, no association between aFABP and various biophysical markers of CVS disease was found. Prospective studies addressing the CVS impact of aFABP in SLE by evaluating adjusted mean aFABP levels over time and CVS events in SLE patients are warranted.


Disclosure: A. Mak, None; H. Schwarz, None; N. Y. Kow, None; S. H. Tay, None; L. H. Ling, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mak A, Schwarz H, Kow NY, Tay SH, Ling LH. Serum Adipocyte Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Level Is Elevated in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) but Not Associated with Biophysical Markers of Cardiovascular Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/serum-adipocyte-fatty-acid-binding-protein-level-is-elevated-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-but-not-associated-with-biophysical-markers-of-cardiovascular-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/serum-adipocyte-fatty-acid-binding-protein-level-is-elevated-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-but-not-associated-with-biophysical-markers-of-cardiovascular-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology