ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2501

Selection of Indicators Reporting Response Rate in Pharmaceutical Trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Preference and Relative Sensitivity

Jingru Tian1, Shuntong Kang2, Dingyao Zhang3 and Qianjin Lu4, 1Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing, China, 2Department of Dermatology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenomics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Nanjing, China, 3Graduate Program in Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 4Hospital for Skin Diseases, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Changsha, China

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: clinical trial, Outcome measures, Quality Indicators, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Interprofessional OA & Lupus

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a common multisystem autoimmune disease with chronic inflammation. Many efficacy evaluation indicators of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for SLE have been proposed but the comparability remains unknown. We aim to explore the preference and comparability of indicators reporting response rate and provide basis for primary outcome selection when evaluating the efficacy of SLE pharmaceutical treatment.

Methods: We systematically searched 3 databases and 3 registries to identify pharmacological intervention-controlled SLE RCTs. Relative discriminations between indicators were assessed by the Bayesian hierarchical linear mixed model.

Results: 33 RCTs met our inclusion criteria and we compared 8 of the most commonly used indicators reporting response rate (Figure 1). Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-4and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index(SRI)-4 were considered the best recommended indicators reporting response rate to discriminate the pharmacological efficacy. Indicator preference was altered by disease severity, classification of drugs and outcome of trials, but SLEDAI-4 had robust efficacy in discriminating ability for most interventions. Of note, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) showed efficacy in trials covering all-severity patients, as well as non-biologics RCTs. BILAG response and Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) response were more cautious in evaluating disease changes. Serious adverse events (SAE) was often applied to evaluate the safety and tolerability of treatments rather than efficacy (Figure 2).

Conclusion: The impressionable efficacy discrimination ability of indicators highlights the importance of flexibility and comprehensiveness when choosing primary outcome(s) (Table 1). As for trials that are only evaluated by SLEDAI-4, attention should be paid to outcome interpretation to avoid the exaggeration of treatment efficacy.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Recommendations for the selection of response rate indicators as primary outcome of RCTs for SLE

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Network of eligible comparisons for efficacy evaluation indicators
The size of the nodes (purple circles) corresponds to the number of trials. Comparisons are linked with a line, the thickness of which corresponds to the number of trials that assessed the comparison.

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. Preference of indicators reporting response rate in pharmacological intervention-controlled RCTs for SLE
(A) Bayesian hierarchical linear mixed model estimated effectiveness with 95% uncertainty intervals on indicators reporting response rate in pharmacological intervention-controlled RCTs for SLE.
(B) The rank of indicators reporting response rate. The sooner an indicator reaches 1, the stronger ability to discriminate treatment efficacy.


Disclosures: J. Tian: None; S. Kang: None; D. Zhang: None; Q. Lu: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tian J, Kang S, Zhang D, Lu Q. Selection of Indicators Reporting Response Rate in Pharmaceutical Trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Preference and Relative Sensitivity [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/selection-of-indicators-reporting-response-rate-in-pharmaceutical-trials-for-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-preference-and-relative-sensitivity/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/selection-of-indicators-reporting-response-rate-in-pharmaceutical-trials-for-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-preference-and-relative-sensitivity/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology