ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1374

Secukinumab in the Treatment of Dactylitis in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis Results from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial

Bruce Kirkham1, Peter Nash2, Sandra Navarra3, Erhard Quebe-Fehling4, Corine Gaillez4, Carlos Sastre4 and Philip Mease5, 1Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, 2School of Medicine Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 3University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines, 4Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 5Seattle Rheumatology Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Biologicals, Inflammation, Joint Structure, Psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Dactylitis is a key and frequent clinical manifestation of psoriatic arthritis (PsA)1 associated with significant disease burden and impaired function.2–3 Randomized controlled trials designed to evaluate the impact of biologics on resolution of dactylitis are limited.3 We report results of a post hoc analysis evaluating the effect of secukinumab (SEC) on PsA patients with dactylitis, from the FUTURE 5 trial (NCT02404350).4

Methods: FUTURE 5 is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 2-year phase 3 trial in patients with active PsA. Patients (aged ≥18 years) were randomized 2:2:2:3 to s.c. SEC 300 mg or 150 mg with loading dose (LD), 150 mg without loading dose (NL) or placebo. All groups received SEC or placebo at baseline, weeks (wks) 1, 2 and 3 and then every 4 wks from Wk 4. Exploratory efficacy analysis at Wks 16 and 52 included time to resolution of dactylitis by dactylitis severity, proportion of patients with resolution of dactylitis, ACR 20/50 response and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90.

Results: Of the 996 patients in the trial, 389 (39%) had dactylitis (SEC 150 mg NL [N=103], 150 mg LD [N=80], 300 mg LD [N=82], and placebo [N=124]). The mean (SD) tender joint count, swollen joint count and dactylitis count at baseline was: 24.0 (17.0), 14.5 (11.4) and 4.1 (4.16) and 19.1 (14.8), 9.5 (8.5) and 0, respectively, in patients with (N=389) and without (N=607) dactylitis at baseline. Higher presence of enthesitis, hsCRP and skin disease were also observed in the dactylitis subset. Median time to resolution of dactylitis (days) [95% CI] in patients on SEC 150 mg NL, 150 mg LD, and 300 mg LD, was 85 [61.0, 113.0], 85 [57.0, 119.0] and 57 [30.0, 85.0], respectively. A higher proportion of SEC treated patients achieved resolution of dactylitis, ACR 20/50 and PASI90 responses vs. placebo at Wk16 with further improvements through Wk 52 (Table 1). Resolution of dactylitis based on the number of dactylitis count at baseline (≤2 and ≥3) are shown in Table 2. SEC 300 mg LD was associated with a faster time to resolution of dactylitis and higher ACR50 and PASI90 responses compared to SEC 150 mg.

Conclusion: A higher level of disease burden was observed in patients with dactylitis compared to patients without dactylitis. SEC 300 mg was associated with a faster time to resolution of dactylitis, higher resolution of dactylitis irrespective of severity and higher responses on skin and joints.

References

  1. Coates, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:1060–
  2. Taylor, et al Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2665–
  3. Gladman, et al; J Rheumatol. 2013; 40:1357–59.
  4. Mease, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:890–97.

Table 1. Efficacy outcomes in patients with baseline dactylitis (observed data)

Table 2. Efficacy outcomes in patients with dactylitis at baseline ≤ 2 and ≥ 3 (observed data)


Disclosure: B. Kirkham, AbbVie, 9, Eli Lilly & Co, 2, 9, Novartis, 2, 9, Janssen, 9, Gilead, 9, UCB, 2, 9; P. Nash, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; S. Navarra, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Astra-Zeneca, 5, 8, Astellas, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 8, Pfizer, 8, Biogen, 2, 5; E. Quebe-Fehling, Novartis, 1, 3; C. Gaillez, Novartis, 1, 3; C. Sastre, Novartis, 3; P. Mease, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Sun, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kirkham B, Nash P, Navarra S, Quebe-Fehling E, Gaillez C, Sastre C, Mease P. Secukinumab in the Treatment of Dactylitis in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis Results from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/secukinumab-in-the-treatment-of-dactylitis-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-post-hoc-analysis-results-from-a-randomized-phase-3-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/secukinumab-in-the-treatment-of-dactylitis-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-post-hoc-analysis-results-from-a-randomized-phase-3-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology