ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2562

Secukinumab Improves Grappa-Omeract Core Domains of Psoriatic Arthritis

Ana-Maria Orbai1, Iain B. McInnes2, Laura C. Coates3, M. Elaine Husni4, Dafna D Gladman5, Laure Gossec6, Luminita Pricop7, Olivier Chambenoit8, Xiangyi Meng8 and Philip J. Mease9, 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 3Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 4Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 5Toronto Western Research Institute and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Université Pierre et Marie Curie and Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France, 7Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA, East Hanover, NJ, 8Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 9Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: clinical trials, interleukins (IL), Outcome measures, psoriatic arthritis and quality of life

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes IL-17A, has demonstrated efficacy for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in multiple phase 3 clinical trials.1–4 To improve and standardize the assessment of PsA outcomes, the PsA core domain set, initially implemented in 2006,5 has been updated by the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) and endorsed by Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)6 in 2016. The updated PsA core domains are: musculoskeletal disease activity (arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and spine symptoms), skin disease activity (psoriasis and nail psoriasis), pain, patient global assessment, physical function, fatigue, health-related quality of life, and systemic inflammation; structural damage assessment is recommended at least once in the development program of PsA medications. Here we report the efficacy of secukinumab vs placebo across individual PsA core domains, using pooled data from 4 phase 3 FUTURE studies.

Methods:

Patients with active PsA participated in the phase 3 clinical trials FUTURE 2, 3, 4, and 5 (397, 414, 341, and 996 patients, respectively).1–4 Data were pooled from the studies using secukinumab dosed at 150 mg (load vs no load), 300 mg, or placebo at the end of the 16-week double-blind period, and efficacy evaluated according to the updated GRAPPA-OMERACT PsA core domains. Core domains were assessed using multiple instruments (Table 1) with improvement defined as percentage of patients achieving ≥ 50% improvement (joints), complete resolution (arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis), or minimal clinically important difference in PsA where known and/or least squares mean change from baseline (patient-reported outcomes). Axial data are from MEASURE 2 (not assessed in FUTURE studies).

Results:

2049 patients were included, of whom 461 received secukinumab 300 mg, 572 received secukinumab 150 mg, 335 received secukinumab 150 mg no load, and 681 received placebo.  Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were broadly similar in all treatment groups.  Efficacy results for each core domain are provided in Table 1.

Conclusion:

Secukinumab demonstrated efficacy across GRAPPA-OMERACT PsA core domains in the phase 3 clinical trials program using multiple instruments and thresholds to measure improvement. Secukinumab 300 mg had the greatest efficacy across domains vs placebo. Our results indicate that secukinumab improves both the disease manifestations and life impact of PsA as demonstrated using the PsA core domain set.

References:

1. McInnes IB, et al. Rheumatology. 2017;56:1993-2003; 2. Nash P, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20: 47; 3. Kivitz A, et al. PANLAR 2018 [abstract 364]; 4. Mease PJ, et al. ACR 2017 [abstract 17L]; 5. Gladman DD, et al. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:1167-70; 6. Orbai AM, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:673-80.


Table 1. Pooled efficacy results across GRAPPA-OMERACT PsA core domains.

Improvement in Patients With PsA at Week 16 in FUTURE Trialsa

PsA Core Domains

Measures and Improvement Definitions, n/M (%)

Secukinumab

300 mg

n = 461

Secukinumab

150 mg

n = 572

Secukinumab

150 mg, no load

n = 335

Placebo

n = 681

Inner circle domains (should be measured in all PsA clinical trials)

Musculoskeletal disease activity

– Arthritis

– Enthesitis

– Dactylitis

SJC76, ≥ 50% improvement

314/444 (70.7)

353/551 (64.1)

201/323 (62.2)

258/626 (41.2)

SJC76 resolution

158/444 (35.6)

151/551 (27.4)

77/323 (23.8)b

104/626 (16.6)

TJC78, ≥ 50% improvement

289/444 (65.1)

316/551 (57.4)

183/323 (56.7)

204/626 (32.6)

TJC78 resolution

89/444 (20.0)

80/551 (14.5)

32/323 (9.9)c

35/626 (5.6)

LEI resolution

151/284 (53.2)

166/374 (44.4)

80/195 (41.0)d

125/431 (29.0)

LDI resolution

107/174 (61.5)

98/188 (52.1)

74/141 (52.5)e

76/231 (32.9)

Skin disease activity

PASI75

151/214 (70.6)

175/306 (57.2)

95/171 (55.6)

34/326 (10.4)

IGA 0/1

112/214 (52.3)

125/306 (40.8)

55/171 (32.2)

25/326 (7.7)

Pain

PsA pain, mean change from BLf,g

−19.75 (n = 440)

−15.94 (n = 545)

−15.44 (n = 320)

−4.46 (n = 616)

PsA pain VAS, ≥ 3 points improvementg

313/440 (71.1)

403/545 (73.9)

229/319 (71.8)

331/617 (53.6)

Patient global

PGA, mean change from BLf,g

−20.04 (n = 440)

−15.92 (n = 545)

−14.60 (n = 320)

−5.31 (n = 616)

Physical function

HAQ-DI, MCID = 0.3

262/459 (57.1)

281/571 (49.2)

172/335 (51.3)

226/680 (33.2)

HAQ-DI, mean change from BLf

−0.48 (n = 438)

−0.36 (n = 544)

−0.40 (n = 320)

−0.16 (n = 615)

HRQOL

SF-36 PCS, MCID ≥ 2.5, %

65.9

59.4

61.8

42.0

SF-36 MCS, MCID ≥ 2.5, %

48.4h

50.0h

49.9h

40.4

PsAQOL, mean change from BLf

−3.65 (n = 443)

−3.26 (n = 548)

−3.16 (n = 319)

−1.20 (n = 622)

Fatigue

FACIT-Fatigue, mean change from BLf,g

1.13 (n = 442)i

0.63 (n = 546)j

−0.29 (n = 319)k

1.18 (n = 621)

Systemic inflammation

Elevated CRP (> 10 mg/L) resolution

83/111 (74.8)

86/134 (64.2)

52/ 75 (69.3)

55/154 (35.7)

Middle circle domains (important but not required in all PsA clinical trials)

Participation

WPAI-GH, mean change from BLf

−13.98 (n = 283)

−10.85 (n = 392)

−13.39 (n = 186)

−4.62 (n = 417)

Structural damage

No structural progression at week 24l

191/217 (88.0)

170/213 (79.8)m

176/210 (83.8)n

218/296 (73.6)

Improvement in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis at Week 16 in MEASURE 2a,o

Secukinumab 150 mg
n =
72

Placebo
n =
74

Spine symptoms

BASDAI, mean change from BL

−2.19p

−0.85

a All P values vs placebo were P < .0001 except where indicated. All P values were for hypothesis generation. No adjustment was made for multiple comparisons. b P = .0073. c P = .0139. d P = .0066. e P = .0003. f Least squares mean change from BL; n is the number of patients with measures at both baseline and week 16 visit. g No MCID has been defined in PsA. h P < .01.  i P = .9213. j P = .2581. k P = .0136. l Defined as a change from baseline vdH-mTSS of ≤ 0.5. Data shown are from the FUTURE 5 study. m P = .1027. n P = .0053. o Baeten D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2534-2548. p P < .001.

BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BL, baseline; CRP, C-reactive protein; FACIT-Fatigue, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; HRQOL, health-related quality of life; IGA, Investigator’s Global Assessment; LDI, Leeds Dactylitis Index; LEI, Leeds Enthesitis Index; MCID, minimal clinically important difference; MCS, mental component summary; PASI75/90, 75%/90% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PCS, physical component summary; PGA, patient global assessment; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; PsAQOL, psoriatic arthritis–specific quality of life; SJC76, swollen joint count based on 76 joints; TJC78, tender joint count based on 78 joints; VAS, 100-mm visual analogue scale; vdH-mTSS, van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score; WPAI-GH, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health.


Disclosure: A. M. Orbai, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Horizon, Janssen, Novartis, 2,Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, 5; I. B. McInnes, Novartis, Janssen, Abbvie, Celgene, Lilly, Pfizer, Leo, UCB, BMS, 5,Janssen, Celgene, UCB, BMS, 2; L. C. Coates, Abbvie, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, 2,Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prothena, Sun Pharma, UCB, 5,Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, UCB, 8; M. E. Husni, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, 2; D. D. Gladman, Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 5,Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 2; L. Gossec, Pfizer, UCB, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2,AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 5; L. Pricop, Novartis, 1, 3; O. Chambenoit, Novartis, 1,Novartis, 3; X. Meng, Novartis, 3,Novartis, 1; P. J. Mease, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 2,AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 5,AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Orbai AM, McInnes IB, Coates LC, Husni ME, Gladman DD, Gossec L, Pricop L, Chambenoit O, Meng X, Mease PJ. Secukinumab Improves Grappa-Omeract Core Domains of Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/secukinumab-improves-grappa-omeract-core-domains-of-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/secukinumab-improves-grappa-omeract-core-domains-of-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology