ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0755

Satisfaction with the Process versus Outcome of Care in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

J. Alex Gibbons1, Cynthia Kahlenberg1, Bella Mehta2, Vinicius Antao1, Emily Ying Lai1, Huong Do1, Linda Russell1, Peter Sculco1, Mark Figgie1 and Susan Goodman1, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Satisfaction, Total Hip Arthroplasty, Total joint replacement, Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II: Measurements (0739–0763)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Patient satisfaction, both with the process of care and the outcome of care, is critical for measuring the quality and value of elective procedures such as arthroplasty, leading the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to include patient satisfaction with the process of care in their payment models. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between patient-reported early postoperative satisfaction with the process of care and 2-year satisfaction with the outcome of care after primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: We identified patients that underwent primary THA or TKA from an institutional arthroplasty registry which administered a survey measuring satisfaction with the outcome of care to patients 2-years post-operatively. An overall satisfaction score was calculated using a previously validated score. Patient satisfaction with the process of care, as measured by the Press Ganey (PG) inpatient survey administered to patients shortly after discharge, was obtained and linked to the registry data. Both satisfaction measures have a range of 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the association between satisfaction with the process of care (PG score) and the outcome of care (2-year score).

Results: The cohort included 721 TKA patients and 760 THA patients who underwent surgery at our institution and completed both the PG survey and 2-year satisfaction questionnaire (Table 1). The mean age was 65.1 years, mean BMI was 28.8, and 56% were female. Satisfaction was high for both measures, with a mean PG score of 88.2 and a mean 2-year score of 95.6. Correlation between the two measures was fair to poor, with Spearman rank correlation coefficients of 0.23 for TKA patients (p < 0.001) and 0.13 for THA patients (p < 0.001). Bubble charts showing the distribution of patients by PG score and 2-year score for TKA and THA are presented in Figures 1a and 1b, respectively.

Conclusion: We found weak correlation between measurements of satisfaction with the process of care surrounding joint arthroplasty using the PG survey and satisfaction with the outcome of care after hip and knee arthroplasty using a validated 2-year satisfaction score. Policymakers should consider both facets of patient satisfaction when considering hospital performance and the value of elective surgical procedures.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics by TKA/THA

Figure 1a. Bubble Chart Displaying PG Score vs. 2-year Score for TKA patients. Bubble chart displaying Press Ganey Overall Assessment Score (PG Score) and 2-year Satisfaction Score (2-year Score) for TKA patients. Bubble size represents the proportion patients with the corresponding values of these scores.

Figure 1b. Bubble Chart Displaying PG Score vs. 2-year Score for THA patients. Bubble chart displaying Press Ganey Overall Assessment Score (PG Score) and 2-year Satisfaction Score (2-year Score) for THA patients. Bubble size represents the proportion patients with the corresponding values of these scores.


Disclosures: J. Gibbons, None; C. Kahlenberg, None; B. Mehta, Novartis, 1, 6; V. Antao, None; E. Lai, None; H. Do, None; L. Russell, Arthritis Foundation, 4; P. Sculco, DePuy, 2, 6, EOS Imaging, 2, 6, Intellijoint Surgical, 2, 5, 6, 11, Lima Corporate, 2, Parvizi Surgical, 11, Zimmer, 2; M. Figgie, HS2, 11, Lima, 2, 10, mekanika, 11, Wishbone, 2, 10, 11; S. Goodman, UCB, 1, NOvartis, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gibbons J, Kahlenberg C, Mehta B, Antao V, Lai E, Do H, Russell L, Sculco P, Figgie M, Goodman S. Satisfaction with the Process versus Outcome of Care in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/satisfaction-with-the-process-versus-outcome-of-care-in-total-hip-and-knee-arthroplasty/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/satisfaction-with-the-process-versus-outcome-of-care-in-total-hip-and-knee-arthroplasty/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology