ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 741

Satisfaction and Impact Associated with the Addition of Belimumab to Systemic Lupus  Erythematosus (SLE) Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Survey of US Rheumatologists and Their Patients

Katie Pascoe1, Steve Lobosco2, David Bell3, Ben Hoskin3, Sulabha Ramachandran4, Bonnie Pobiner5 and David Chang6, 1Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, United Kingdom, 2Adelphi Real World Ltd., Macclesfield, United Kingdom, 3Autoimmune, Adelphi Real World Ltd., Manchester, United Kingdom, 4Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Renaissance Centre, PA, 5Immuno-Inflammation Therapy Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Triangle Park, NC, 6US Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: belimumab, Fatigue, Lupus, pain and patient outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:
Patient and physician treatment satisfaction influences
long-term adherence with a treatment regimen. The primary objective was to
identify factors linked to satisfaction with the use of belimumab
in clinical practice, in the United States (US).  Understanding the impact of belimumab on clinical and patient outcomes was a secondary
objective.

Methods:
The Adelphi Lupus Plus
Project (GSK study 202146) involved US rheumatologists (n=70) who completed
paper-based data collection forms for five consecutive, eligible patients. Patients
were
≥18 years old, diagnosed with SLE
for ≥6 months, and receiving
 intravenous belimumab
plus standard SLE care for
≥3months.
Each rheumatologist only included one patient who had received belimumab for 3-6 months. The Western Institutional Review
Board granted an IRB exemption for this study.

Results:
The belimumab cohort (n=376)
was 95% female, mean age 42, and Caucasian (56.1%) or African American (27.1%).
Mean time since SLE diagnosis was 7 years and mean time treated with belimumab was 13 months, 65% were employed
or were students. The majority of patients had disease involving both skin and
joints (64%); 19.8% had only joint involvement.  Prior to adding belimumab,
most had ‘moderate’ (60%) or ‘severe’ (24%) disease and disease that was “deteriorating” (85%).

The patient self-completion form was
completed by 72% of patients (n=270). The majority of patients (86%) reported a
level of satisfaction with belimumab; 28% were   ‘very
satisfied’, 32% ‘satisfied’ and 26% were ‘somewhat satisfied’. Most physicians
were satisfied with belimumab (83%). Concordance
between physician and patient satisfaction was moderate (Kappa Score = 0.4541). Predefined, multivariate analysis
identified factors strongly associated with satisfaction (Table 1).

Table  SEQ Table * ARABIC 1. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with patient and physician satisfaction with beliumumab. Factors reported by the patient are denoted by (Pt) and by the Rheumatologist (Rh)

OR (95% CI)

PATIENT SATISFACTION

Patient satisfaction is associated with:

Improved ability to engage in leisure activities (Pt)

4.66 (2.12 -10.25)

Reduction in fatigue severity (Rh)

3.72 (1.77 -7.79)

General symptom improvement (Pt)

3.02 (1.15 – 7.94)

Improvement in pain/achiness (Pt)

2.71 (1.12 – 6.52)

Satisfaction with time taken to receive belimumab (Pt)

2.69 (1.40 – 5.15)

Satisfaction with frequency of belimumab (Pt)

1.94 (1.04 -3.62)

Patient dissatisfaction is associated with:

More severe disease prior to belimumab (Rh)

0.36 (0.14 -0.92)

Current use of immunosuppressants (Rh)

0.40 (0.19 – 0.84)

RHEUMATOLOGIST SATISFACTION

Physician satisfaction is associated with:

Improvement in pain/achiness (Pt)

6.16 (2.20 – 17.24)

Satisfaction with frequency of belimumab (Pt)

3.91 (2.02 – 7.56)

Reduction in fatigue severity (Rh)

3.76 (1.93 – 7.35)

Physician dissatisfaction is associated with:

Disease classed as currently ‘deteriorating or unstable ‘ (Rh)

0.13 (0.06 – 0.26)

Disease not classed as currently  ‘mild’ (Rh)

0.29 (0.13 – 0.63)

Improved  ability to remember things (Pt)

0.43 (0.22 – 0.87)

Current use of immunosuppressants (Rh)

0.46 (0.26 – 0.83)

Higher numbers of flares in last 12 months (Rh)

0.75 (0.63 – 0.91)

Patient satisfaction was higher for those treated
with belimumab for > 6 months, versus 3-6 months. For
the majority of patients, physicians reported an improvement in overall symptoms
(89%), reduction in flare severity (75%) and flare frequency (75%) since
starting belimumab. Patients themselves stated an
improvement in overall symptoms (89%), fatigue (83%), and pain (83%). Patients
also reported improvements in feeling rested upon waking (91%), improved concentration
(59%), and work (52%), as well as an improved ability to engage in leisure
activities, daily activities and caring for children.

Conclusion:
Adding belimumab improved
symptoms of fatigue and pain and both factors were positively associated with
patient and physician satisfaction.  Improvement
in the ability to engage in leisure activities and general symptom improvement were
strongly associated with higher patient satisfaction. This insight into satisfaction
should enhance the dialog between physicians and their patients about the
outcomes expected during belimumab initiation; in
turn, this may improve adherence.


Disclosure: K. Pascoe, GlaxoSmithKline, 1,GlaxoSmithKline, 3; S. Lobosco, None; D. Bell, None; B. Hoskin, None; S. Ramachandran, GlaxoSmithKline, 3; B. Pobiner, GlaxoSmithKline, 1,GlaxoSmithKline, 3; D. Chang, GlaxoSmithKline, 1,GlaxoSmithKline, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pascoe K, Lobosco S, Bell D, Hoskin B, Ramachandran S, Pobiner B, Chang D. Satisfaction and Impact Associated with the Addition of Belimumab to Systemic Lupus  Erythematosus (SLE) Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Survey of US Rheumatologists and Their Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/satisfaction-and-impact-associated-with-the-addition-of-belimumab-to-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-treatment-a-cross-sectional-survey-of-us-rheumatologists-and-their-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/satisfaction-and-impact-associated-with-the-addition-of-belimumab-to-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-treatment-a-cross-sectional-survey-of-us-rheumatologists-and-their-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology