ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2547

Safety Results of 50% Enrollment from a Multicenter, Randomized, Double‑blind, Placebo‑controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Repository Corticotropin Injection in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Despite Moderate‑dose Corticosteroid Use

Anca Askanase1, Dharani Munirathinam 2, Enxu Zhao 2, Julie Zhu 2, Erin Connolly-Strong 2 and Richard Furie 3, 1Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 2Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, ARD, LLC, Bedminster, NJ, 3Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bone turnover markers, corticosteroids and Lupus, drug safety, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH1-39) analogues and other pituitary peptides that stimulates endogenous corticosteroid (CS) production and is an agonist for all 5 melanocortin receptors. RCI is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of acute exacerbations or as maintenance therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In a pilot study,1 RCI improved disease activity (vs placebo) and was well tolerated in patients with SLE. In a separate study, RCI increased endogenous cortisol levels to a similar extent as < 10 mg ofexogenous prednisone (Figure 1; data on file). The current trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of RCI in patients with persistently active SLE despite use of moderate-dose CSs (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02953821). This abstract describes the safety data from 50% of the expected enrolled subjects from the blinded and ongoing trial.

Methods: Patients enrolled in this multicenter, double­-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 24-week trial are required to have SLE (≥4 of 11 ACR 1997 criteria) and active disease (moderate to severe rash and/or arthritis) despite stable doses of CSs ≥4 weeks before screening. Treatments are 1 mL RCI (80 U) or placebo subcutaneously every other day for 4 weeks, followed by twice per week for 20 weeks. Randomization is stratified by study site location (US or outside of US) and prednisone or equivalent dose (≤20, >20 mg/d). Patients remain on stable doses of CSs through week 16, with tapering encouraged between weeks 16 and 24. The primary efficacy end point is the proportion of SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) responders at week 16. Secondary and exploratory end points include measures of disease activity, prednisone dose, and serum biomarkers (ie, complements, autoantibodies, and inflammatory and bone turnover markers). Target enrollment is 270 patients; 162 are expected to be randomly assigned at ~60 global sites. Safety assessments include treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), physical examination, and vital signs and are summarized with descriptive statistics only.

Results: The 80 patients in this evaluation represent ~50% of the patients expected to be randomly assigned in the study. Data from these patients were blinded. Demographics and baseline characteristics show a racially diverse population (Table 1). A total 53 (66.3%) patients reported a TEAE, with the most common being headache (8.8%) and insomnia (6.3%). TEAEs of special interest are shown in Table 2. The reported serious AEs (pneumonia, hypertension) were deemed related to treatment and expected. No Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions or deaths were reported.

Conclusion: In a study of RCI in patients with active SLE despite moderate‑dose CS, blinded 50% enrollment data show disease characteristics consistent with those expected for patients with moderate/severe SLE. The safety profile suggests that RCI is well tolerated, consistent with a modest increase in cortisol production. The complete dataset will provide valuable information on the role of RCI in refractory SLE.

1 Furie R, et al. Lupus Sci Med. 2016;3(1):e000180.

a n=12 nondiabetic healthy subjects. Data represent mean ± standard error of mean.
Abbreviation: RCI, repository corticotropin injection.

a Maximum, 100 mm.
b n=79.
Abbreviations: anti-ds, anti–double stranded; BILAG, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; PGA, Physician’s Global Assessment; SD, standard deviation; SLEDAI-2K, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000.

*One patient had 2 TEAEs.
Abbreviation: TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.


Disclosure: A. Askanase, None; D. Munirathinam, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, ARD, LLC, 3; E. Zhao, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, ARD, LLC, 3; J. Zhu, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, ARD, LLC, 3; E. Connolly-Strong, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, ARD, LLC, 3; R. Furie, Biogen, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Askanase A, Munirathinam D, Zhao E, Zhu J, Connolly-Strong E, Furie R. Safety Results of 50% Enrollment from a Multicenter, Randomized, Double‑blind, Placebo‑controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Repository Corticotropin Injection in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Despite Moderate‑dose Corticosteroid Use [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-results-of-50-enrollment-from-a-multicenter-randomized-double%e2%80%91blind-placebo%e2%80%91controlled-study-to-assess-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-repository-corticotropin-injection-in-patien/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-results-of-50-enrollment-from-a-multicenter-randomized-double%e2%80%91blind-placebo%e2%80%91controlled-study-to-assess-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-repository-corticotropin-injection-in-patien/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology