ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 509

Safety Profile of Upadacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Integrated Analysis from the SELECT Phase 3 Clinical Program

Stanley Cohen1, Ronald van Vollenhoven 2, Kevin Winthrop 3, Cristiano A. Zerbini 4, Yoshiya Tanaka 5, Louis Bessette 6, Ying Zhang 7, Nasser Khan 8, Barbara Hendrickson 7, Jose Jeffrey Enejosa 7 and Gerd Burmester 9, 1Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 2Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 4Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica, São Paulo, Brazil, 5University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 6Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 7AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA, North Chicago, IL, 8Abbvie Inc, North Chicago, IL, 9Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Integrated Summary of Safety, pivotal and phase 3, Upadacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Novel Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK1-selective inhibitor, was evaluated in a comprehensive clinical program of 5 pivotal Phase 3 randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) across the full spectrum of RA patient (pt) populations1-5.

Assess the overall safety of UPA as monotherapy (mono) and as combination therapy with background csDMARDs in pts with moderately to severely active RA from the safety database of the Phase 3 clinical program.

Methods: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from 5 pivotal, randomized, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled Phase 3 trials of UPA 15 mg (included in all 5 trials) or 30 mg QD (included in 4 trials) in RA pts were analyzed and summarized for the integrated placebo (PBO) (3 trials; 12/14 weeks), the integrated methotrexate (MTX) (2 trials; mean exposure: 36 weeks), the originator adalimumab (ADA) (mean exposure: 42 weeks), the UPA 15 mg (mean exposure: 53 weeks) and the UPA 30 mg (mean exposure: 59 weeks) groups as exposure adjusted event rates (EAERs; events/100 patient‑years [E/100PY]).

Results: Across the Phase 3 trials, 3834 pts received ≥1 dose of UPA 15 mg (n=2630) or 30 mg QD (n=1204), with no option to switch doses, for a total of 4020.1 PY of UPA exposure. The EAERs of overall SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation on UPA 15 mg were comparable to ADA; while the rates of both were higher on UPA 30 vs UPA 15 mg and MTX. Across the studies, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis and urinary tract infections were the most commonly reported AEs and occurred more frequently in the UPA compared with PBO. Rates of deaths were comparable across the treatment groups. Serious infection (SIEs) rates were comparable between UPA 15 mg and ADA while higher on UPA compared with MTX. Rates of herpes zoster (HZ) were higher in both UPA groups vs MTX and ADA. The rates of SIE and HZ were higher on UPA 30 vs 15 mg. Rates of malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]) and adjudicated MACE and VTE were comparable across the treatment groups. The rate of NMSC in UPA 15 mg, MTX and ADA groups were similar with higher rates in the UPA 30 mg group, however the rates for both UPA groups were in the range reported for RA patients treated with DMARDs3. The age-gender adjusted standardized incidence ratio (SIR, 95% CI) for malignancies other than NMSC (15 mg: 0.98 [0.61, 1.49], 30 mg: 1.49 [0.85, 2.42]) was within the range expected for the general population (SEER 18 Registry 2000-2015).

Conclusion: The rate of SIE on UPA 15 mg was similar to ADA. The rate of HZ was higher on both UPA doses compared to MTX and ADA. The rates of VTE, MACE, and malignancy were comparable with that observed in the MTX and ADA groups while also being consistent with reported rates in the RA population.

REFERENCES:

  1. Burmester GR et al. The Lancet. 2018;391,2503-12.
  2. Genovese MC et al. The Lancet. 2018;391,2513-24.
  3. Smolen JS et al. Ann Rhem Dis. 2018;77,67-8.
  4. Fleischmann R et al. Arth & Rheum. 2018;70
  5. van Vollenhoven R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70 (S 10) [Abs].


Table


Disclosure: S. Cohen, AbbVie, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5; R. van Vollenhoven, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, Arthrogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Lilly, Pfizer, and UCB, 2, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB., 5, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 5, 8, Biotest, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Lilly, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Vertex, 5, 8; K. Winthrop, AbbVie, 5, Abbvie, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Galapagos NV, 5, Gilead, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, GSK, 5, Lilly, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 5, UCB, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, UCB Pharma, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, and Roche., 2, 5; C. Zerbini, Amgen, 2, Amgen, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier and Roche, 2, Lilly, 2, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 2; Y. Tanaka, Abbvie, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Asahi-kasei, 2, Asahi-Kasei, 2, Asahi-kasei, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, 2, Astellas, 8, Astellas Pharma, 9, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, Astellas, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Pfizer, Sanofic, UCB, YL Biologics, 8, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers, 2, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 8, Chugai, 2, 8, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 8, Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Sanofi, Abbvie, Pfizer, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, 8, Eisai, 2, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 8, Genzyme, 5, Glaxo-Smithkline, UCB, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Takeda, Janssen, Asahi-kasei, 8, Janssen, 8, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 2, 8, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Takeda, Abbvie, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ono, MSD, Taisho-Toyama., 2, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai, Bristol-Myers, MSD, Astellas, Abbvie, Eisai, 2, Novartis, 8, Ono, 2, Pfizer, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 8, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 2, Takeda, 2, 8, Teijin, 8, UCB, 2, YL Biologics, 8; L. Bessette, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB Pharma, AbbVie Inc, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Novartis., 2, 5, 8, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; Y. Zhang, AbbVie, 3, 4, Abbvie Inc, 1, 4; N. Khan, Abbvie Inc, 1, 4; B. Hendrickson, AbbVie, 3, 4, Abbvie Inc, 1, 4; J. Enejosa, AbbVie, 3, 4, Abbvie Inc, 1, 4; G. Burmester, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma., 5, 8, AbbVie Inc., 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Gilead, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Merck Shar & Dohme, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Union Chimique Belge, 2, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cohen S, van Vollenhoven R, Winthrop K, Zerbini C, Tanaka Y, Bessette L, Zhang Y, Khan N, Hendrickson B, Enejosa J, Burmester G. Safety Profile of Upadacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Integrated Analysis from the SELECT Phase 3 Clinical Program [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-profile-of-upadacitinib-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-integrated-analysis-from-the-select-phase-3-clinical-program/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-profile-of-upadacitinib-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-integrated-analysis-from-the-select-phase-3-clinical-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology