ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0805

Safety and Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine According to Weight-based Dose: Results of a Global Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jacquelyn Nestor1, Zahraa Qamhieh2, Shivani Garg3 and April Jorge1, 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, 3University of Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disease Activity, meta-analysis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment I (0801–0806)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-2:15PM

Background/Purpose: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a foundational therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment, as it prolongs disease-free and damage-free survival. However, the optimal dose is debated due to dose-related risks for toxicity, and the efficacy of lower dosing (≤5 mg/kg/day) needs to be further elucidated. Therefore, we designed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of HCQ dose on risks of HCQ-related toxicities and adverse SLE outcomes.

Methods: A comprehensive search was performed using MeSH headings and keywords (e.g., lupus, SLE, hydroxychloroquine, toxicity, flares, death or mortality, etc.) in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. We included observational and interventional studies associations between HCQ dose and: i) toxicity (cardiac or eye); ii) poor SLE outcomes defined as SLE flares, acute care utilization for active SLE, disease activity, death, cardiovascular disease, kidney failure, or thrombotic events in subjects with SLE. Risk of bias was assessed using standard tools for all studies. We examined pooled hazard ratios (HR) of HCQ retinopathy (primary outcome) and pooled odds ratios (OR) of toxicity when time-to-event data was not available (secondary outcome) in high vs. low HCQ dose groups ( >5 vs. ≤5 mg/kg/day) using a random effects model. Additionally, we calculated the pooled odds of SLE flares/acute care utilization for active SLE by low vs. high HCQ dose groups. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2.

Results: Among 2246 manually reviewed studies, 190 met initial inclusion. Of these, 25 studies compared HCQ-related toxicities or poor SLE outcome by weight-based HCQ dose and were included in the meta-analysis (Figure 1). Eight studies assessed the outcome of HCQ retinopathy in SLE patients, of which two assessed HRs by weight-based dose. Among eight studies assessing outcomes of SLE flares/acute care utilization, five had available data for inclusion in pooled HRs for the 5 mg/kg weight-based dosing threshold (Table 1). The pooled HR for HCQ retinopathy associated with >5 vs ≤5 mg/kg dosing was 3.83 (95% CI 1.82-8.08), Fig. 2). At the same time, the pooled HR of SLE flare/acute care utilization for active SLE associated with ≤5 vs >5 mg/kg dosing was 1.84 (95% CI 1.18-2.87). Other outcomes of interest were each assessed by fewer than two studies that compared the 5 mg/kg weight-based dosing threshold.

Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of HCQ dose and SLE outcomes, we found that higher HCQ dosing >5 mg/kg is associated with over three times higher risk of HCQ retinopathy but nearly two times lower risk of SLE flare/acute care utilization for active SLE. These findings indicate the need for clinicians and patients to weigh the potential harms versus benefits when determining the optimal dose of HCQ in SLE treatment.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Literature Review and Included Studies

Supporting image 2Table 1. Included Studies Addressing the Association of Hydroxychloroquine Dose and Clinical Effectiveness, Safety

Supporting image 3Forest Plots for A) pooled HRs for HCQ retinopathy, B) pooled ORs for SLE flares/acute care utilization for active SLE


Disclosures: J. Nestor: None; Z. Qamhieh: None; S. Garg: None; A. Jorge: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nestor J, Qamhieh Z, Garg S, Jorge A. Safety and Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine According to Weight-based Dose: Results of a Global Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-efficacy-of-hydroxychloroquine-according-to-weight-based-dose-results-of-a-global-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-efficacy-of-hydroxychloroquine-according-to-weight-based-dose-results-of-a-global-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology