ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1516

Safety and Efficacy Of Etanercept In Early Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial At 24 Weeks

Maxime Dougados1, Désirée van der Heijde2, Joachim Sieper3, Jürgen Braun4, Walter P. Maksymowych5, Gustavo Citera6, James Cheng-Chung Wei7, Jan Lenaerts8, Ronald Pedersen9, Randi Bonin10, Ehab Y. Mahgoub10, Bonnie Vlahos10 and Jack Bukowski11, 1Rheumatology B Department, Paris-Descartes University, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France, 2Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 4Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany, 5Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 6Rheumatology, Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 7Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, 8Reuma Instituut, Hasselt, Belgium, 9Specialty Care, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 10Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 11Department of Specialty Care, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, Effective, etanercept, safety and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment: II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Limited data are available on the efficacy of anti-TNF agents in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). The objective of this analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) vs placebo after 12 weeks of double-blind treatment and an additional 12 weeks of open-label ETN treatment in patients with nr-axSpA who had an insufficient response to NSAIDs.

Methods: Enrolled patients satisfied ASAS criteria for axSpA, had been exhibiting symptoms between 3 months-5 years, failed ≥2 NSAIDs (including current one), and a BASDAI score ≥4 despite current NSAID use. Patients were blinded and randomized to ETN 50 mg weekly (QW) or placebo and continued NSAIDs for 12 weeks followed by open-label ETN 50 mg QW for an additional 12 weeks (weeks 12-24). Efficacy outcomes were assessed at week 12 and 24 and safety monitored throughout the study. Analyses used ANCOVA models with baseline score, treatment, region and sacroiliac joints status at baseline (MRI) as variables. LOCF imputation was used for missing data.

Results: 215 patients were randomized and included in the mITT population (ETN=106; placebo=109); mean age at baseline was 32 years (range, 18–49 years); 61% were male; and mean disease duration was 2.4 years (range, 0-16.0 years; median, 2.3 years). At week 12, 208 patients (ETN=102; placebo=106) enrolled in the open-label phase. ASAS40 at 12 weeks was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving ETN vs placebo (32.4% vs 15.7%, respectively; P=0.006).  At week 12, there were substantial differences in clinical outcomes between the ETN and placebo groups, but the differences largely disappeared when placebo patients were treated with ETN in the open-label phase (table). As compared to week 12, an increased proportion of patients achieved all efficacy outcomes at week 24, after the switch to open label ETN. The percentages of patients (safety population) with any adverse events were 57% (63/111) vs 46% (52/113) at week 12 and 34% (35/102) vs 50% (53/106) at week 24 in the ETN vs placebo groups, respectively.

Conclusion: In this population of patients with early, active nr-axSpA who had an inadequate response to ≥2 NSAIDs, etanercept was more effective than placebo during the first 12 weeks. Clinical outcomes were similar after all patients were treated with ETN (weeks 12-24). No new safety signals were reported.

Table. Effects of ETN versus placebo in patients with nr-axSpA (mITT, LOCFa)

 

Week 12
(double-blind period)

Week 24
(open-label period)

 

ETN 50 mg + NSAID

(n=106)

Placebo + NSAID

(n=109)

ETN 50 mg + NSAID/ETN 50 mg + NSAID

(n=102)

Placebo + NSAID/
 ETN 50 mg + NSAID
(n=106)

Parameter, n/N (%)

 

 

 

 

ASAS20b

53/105 (50.5)

41/108 (38.0)

66/102 (64.7)

75/105 (71.4)

ASAS40b

34/105 (32.4)c

17/108 (15.7)

45/102 (44.1)

54/105 (51.4)

ASAS 5/6b

33/103 (32.0)c

10/106 (9.4)

40/99 (40.4)

43/104 (41.4)

ASAS partial remissionb

27/105 (25.7)c

13/109 (11.9)

32/102 (31.4)

46/106 (43.4)

ASDAS inactive disease

42/105 (40.0)c

19/109 (17.4)

48/102 (47.1)

62/106 (58.5)

Mean Change from Baseline (95%CI)

 

 

 

 

ASDAS-CRP

-1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)d

-0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)d

-1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)

-1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)

BASDAI

-2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)d

-1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)d

-2.9 (-3.3, -2.4)

-3.3 (-3.7, -2.9)

BASFI

-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)d

-0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)d

-1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)

-1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)

BASMI

-0.3 (-0.6, -0.0)d

-0.3 (-0.5, 0.0)

-0.5 (-0.7, -0.2)

-0.3 (-0.5, -0.1)

BAS-G total

-1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)d

-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)d

-2.8 (-3.3, -2.3)

-2.89 (-3.3, -2.5)

aPatients were not carried forward into the open-label period if they dropped out during the double-blind period. bModified ASAS criteria (2009) European Medicines Agency, available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu. cP<0.05 vs placebo, CMH chi-square test. dP<0.05 within treatment group from baseline.

 


Disclosure:

M. Dougados,
None;

D. van der Heijde,
None;

J. Sieper,

AbbVie, Merck, Pfizer, UCB,

2,

AbbVie, Merck, Pfizer, UCB,

5,

AbbVie, Merck, Pfizer, UCB,

8;

J. Braun,
None;

W. P. Maksymowych,

Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Synarc and UCB Pharma,

2,

Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Synarc and UCB Pharma,

5,

Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Synarc and UCB Pharma,

8;

G. Citera,
None;

J. Cheng-Chung Wei,
None;

J. Lenaerts,
None;

R. Pedersen,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

R. Bonin,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

E. Y. Mahgoub,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

B. Vlahos,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

J. Bukowski,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-efficacy-of-etanercept-in-early-non-radiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis-a-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-trial-at-24-weeks/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology