ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2896

Safety and Effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Systemic Sclerosis Ulcers

Susan Armstrong1, A. Wayne Evans2, Zareen Ahmad3 and Sindhu R. Johnson4, 1Toronto Scleroderma Program, Division of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Hyperbaric Medicine Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Division of Rheumatology, Toronto Scleroderma Program, Division of Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Division of Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and ulcers

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud's – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Vascular complications of systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma) can result in ulcers in the distal extremities, which limit function and are often refractory to conventional treatments. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been used in the treatment of non-healing wounds, but its utility in patients with SSc is uncertain. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of HBOT for SSc ulcers. We secondarily evaluated the effectiveness of HBOT for SSc ulcers, and patient selection criteria for treatment of SSc ulcer patients with HBOT.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study of SSc patients who were evaluated for treatment with HBOT in the Toronto Scleroderma Program and the Toronto General Hospital Hyperbaric Unit between 2002 and 2015. HBOT treatments involved 30-50 sessions in a monoplace or multiplace chamber with compression to a maximum depth of 2.5 atm and breathing oxygen for a total of 90 minutes 5 days per week. Ulcers were defined as lesions with a visually discernable depth and loss of epithelial continuity. Reasons for declining access to HBOT, adverse events and effectiveness in ulcer healing were evaluated. An ulcer was categorized as healed if it achieved epithelial continuity or National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) stage X (stable necrotic tissue core or eschar). Transcutaneous oxygen tension criteria for evaluating ‘healability’ in diabetic foot ulcers were applied as none have been validated for the SSc.

Results: 2261 subjects were reviewed to identify 36 HBOT treated ulcers in 10 SSc subjects. They had a mean ± SD age of 58.0 ± 13.9 years. Eighty-seven percent were female. Ulcer locations included fingertip (n=10 (28%)), hand-PIP/DIP (n=11 (31%)), hand-MCP (n=2 (6%)) and lower extremity (n=10 (28%)). Thirteen SSc subjects did not receive HBOT due to reasons that included lack of achieving “healable” response to oxygen on transcutaneous oximetry and technical limitations in sensor placement options (n=4), presence of moderate – severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=2) and confinement anxiety (n=1). Of the HBOT treated subjects, adverse events included brief episodes of otic barotrauma (n=2) and nausea (n=2). Twenty-three (64%) ulcers improved after HBOT.

Figure 1. Ulcer improvement by location

Conclusion: HBOT may be an effective option for SSc patients with non-healing ulcers. Therapy was generally well-tolerated, with no significant adverse events although transient self-limiting otic barotrauma was reported. Patient selection criteria specific to the SSc population may need to be developed as the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension is considered a contraindication to HBOT.


Disclosure: S. Armstrong, None; A. W. Evans, None; Z. Ahmad, None; S. R. Johnson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Armstrong S, Evans AW, Ahmad Z, Johnson SR. Safety and Effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Systemic Sclerosis Ulcers [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-effectiveness-of-hyperbaric-oxygen-therapy-for-systemic-sclerosis-ulcers/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-effectiveness-of-hyperbaric-oxygen-therapy-for-systemic-sclerosis-ulcers/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology