ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 489

Rosuvastatin Improves Arterial Stiffness in Patients with Inflammatory Joint Diseases

Eirik Ikdahl1, Silvia Rollefstad1, Jonny Hisdal2, Inge C. Olsen3, Ingar Holme4, Terje R. Pedersen5, Tore Kvien6 and Anne Grete Semb1, 1Preventive Cardio-Rheuma clinic, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Section of Vascular Investigations, Oslo University Hospital Aker, Oslo, Norway, 3Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Department of biostatistics, epidemiology and health economics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 5Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 6Dept of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Atherosclerosis, Biomarkers, Cardiovascular disease, inflammatory arthritis and statins

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Safety of Biologics and Small Molecules in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Arterial stiffness, as pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) has emerged as early risk markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with inflammatory joint diseases (IJD). In IJD patients, statin treatment has demonstrated a significant improvement in arterial stiffness. Furthermore, we have shown that statin treatment induced carotid plaque (CP) regression in IJD patients. However, the effect of statins on arterial stiffness in IJD patients with established atherosclerosis is still not elucidated. The aim of the present study was therfore to evaluate the effect of rosuvastatin on arterial stiffness in patients with IJD who had CP. We also evaluated the association between the change in arterial stiffness and change in inflammation markers, disease activity, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), blood pressure (BP), CP height and intima-media thickness (IMT) after 18 months of rosuvastatin treatment.

Methods

The study population included 89 statin naïve patients with IJD (55 with rheumatoid arthritis, 23 with ankylosing spondylitis and 11 with psoriatic arthritis). All patients had B-mode ultrasound verified CP and received rosuvastatin therapy over 18 months to obtain LDL-c goals (<1.8mmol/L). The arterial stiffness variables PWV and AIx were measured prior to, and at the end of the study, using the Sphygmocor device. We used paired-samples t-tests to assess change from baseline, and regression analysis to assess the association between change in arterial stiffness and other outcome measures.   

Results

Study population demographics are presented in table 1. After 18 months rosuvastatin therapy, a significant reduction in Aix was observed, from mean (SD) 27.9 (7.7) % to 26.2 (8.2) % (p=0.026). Furthermore, PWV decreased from 8.1 (1.6) m/s2 to 7.8 (1.5) m/s2 (p=0.031). In a logistic regression model where change in arterial stiffness was the dependent variable (defined as either increasing or decreasing related to baseline value), change in and exposure of systolic blood pressure during the study period influenced PWV significantly: odds ratio (95% CI): 1.06 (1.02, 1.09)(p=0.005) and 0.97 (0.94; 1.00)(p=0.035). Change in CP height and rosuvastatin dose predicted change in AIx 5.72 significantly: odds ratio (95% CI): (1.25, 26.25)(p=0.025) and 1.22 (1.05, 1.41)(p=0.009).

Conclusion

This is the first clinical trial showing that rosuvastatin treatment improves arterial stiffness in IJD patients with atherosclerosis.

Fig. 1

Legends Fig 1: AIx: augmentation index, PWV: pulse wave velocity

RA

AS

PsA

All

p-value

RA/AS/PsA

Number n (%)

55 (61.8)

23 (25.8)

11 (12.4)

89

–

Age median (IQR)

62.0

(57.0-68.0)

59.0

(53.0-64.0)

60.0

(52.0-64.0)

61.0

(56.0-67.0)

0.07

Sex male/female n (%)

14/41

(25.5/74.5)

15/8

(65.2/34.8)

5/6

(45.5/54.5)

34/55

(38.2/61.8)

0.004

Disease duration median (IQR)

16.0

(6.5-22.3)

22.0

(16.0-30.0)

13.0

(2.0-30.0)

16.0

(8.0-26.0)

0.11

CV risk factors

Smoke n (%)

11 (20.0)

3 (13.0)

3 (27.3)

17 (19.1)

0.59

Body mass index mean±SD

25.0±2.9

25.2±2.7

26.1±3.7

25.2±2.9

0.55

Total cholesterol (mmol/L) mean±SD

6.43±1.24

6.19±0.90

6.62±1.07

6.39±1.13

0.54

HDL-c (mmol/L) mean±SD

1.78±0.48

1.53±0.45

1.60±0.51

1.69±0.49

0.09

Triglycerides (mmol/L) median (IQR)   

1.2 (0.9-1.6)

1.4 (0.9-1.9)

1.1 (0.7-2.9)

1.2 (0.9-1.8)

0.67

LDL-c (mmol/L) mean±SD

3.95±0.96

3.97±0.86

4.32±1.00

4.00±0.94

0.48

Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) mean±SD

142.6±19.8

144.8±14.2

147.4±24.6

143.7±19.0

0.71

Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) mean±SD

82.7±8.9

85.2±8.2

87.9±10.8

84.0±9.0

0.16

Co morbidities n (%)

Hypertension

31 (56.4)

16 (69.6)

6 (54.5)

53 (59.6)

0.52

Diabetes

3 (5.5)

2 (8.7)

0 (0.0)

5 (5.6)

0.59

Cardiovascular disease

6 (10.9)

2 (8.7)

0 (0.0)

8 (9.0)

0.51

Carotid artery plaque median (range)

1 (1-5)

1 (1-3)

2 (1-3)

1 (1-5)

0.34

Haematology mean±SD

ESR (mm/h)

15.8±10.3

12.9±9.8

13.9±5.7

14.8±9.7

0.47

CRP (mg/L) median (IQR)  

3.0 (1-4)

1 (1-3)

3 (2-6)

2 (1-4)

0.22

Medication n (%)

Prednisolone

21 (38.2)

2 (8.7)

2 (18.2)

25 (28.1)

0.02

NSAIDs

21 (38.2)

12 (52.2)

5 (45.5)

38 (42.7)

0.52

Synthetic DMARDs

36 (65.5)

5 (21.7)

9 (81.8)

50 (56.2)

0.002

Biologic DMARDs

15 (27.3)

8 (34.8)

5 (45.5)

28 (31.5)

0.53

Antihypertensive medication

16 (29.1)

4 (17.4)

2 (18.2)

22 (24.7)

0.48


Disclosure:

E. Ikdahl,
None;

S. Rollefstad,
None;

J. Hisdal,
None;

I. C. Olsen,
None;

I. Holme,
None;

T. R. Pedersen,
None;

T. Kvien,
None;

A. G. Semb,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rosuvastatin-improves-arterial-stiffness-in-patients-with-inflammatory-joint-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology