ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2448

Rituximab as the first line treatment in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus

Haiting Wang1, Liling Zhao2, Shuang Ye3 and Shaoying Yang2, 1Renji Hospital, Rockville, MD, 2Renji hospital, Shanghai, China (People's Republic), 3Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China, Shanghai, Shanghai, China (People's Republic)

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: B-Cell Targets, Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2437–2469) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Rituximab (RTX) has been commonly used for the treatment of patients with severe or refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), yet real-world data concerning RTX as the first-line treatment in newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe SLE patients is lacking.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a newly diagnosed (< 3 months) hospitalized Systemic Lupus Inception Cohort (hSLIC) at our center between 1 April 2013 and 1 September 2022. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months or until death. The cohort included patients on RTX (n=104) as the first-line treatment and those on conventional immunosuppressants (IS) (n=154) as comparators. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to minimize possible confounding factors. Primary outcome analyses included attainment of modified lupus low disease activity state (mLLDAS) and remission, by 12 months. Secondary outcomes focused on mortality, major flare rates, and the incidence of adverse events of interest, i.e., major infections.

Results: After IPTW, 76.0%/50.5% of RTX-treated patients achieved mLLDAS/remission versus 45.8%/9.7% in the conventional IS group during 12 months follow-up, respectively (p=0.005 and p< 0.001). Sensitivity analyses with renal or neuropsychiatric lupus removal and timeline breakout (pre versus post November 2019) confirmed the robustness of RTX’s efficacy in achieving mLLDAS and remission outcomes. Additionally, the incidence of major infections was similar between the two groups (12.5% vs. 8.4%, p=0.288).

Conclusion: In patients with newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe SLE, upfront treatment with RTX was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to conventional immunosuppressive therapy, in terms of achieving low disease activity or remission by 12 months.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Flow chart of the study.

Data are number (%) of patients. RTX: rituximab; IS: immunosuppressants; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; MTX: methotrexate; CTX: cyclophosphamide; AZA: azathioprine; CsA: cyclosporine A; LEF: leflunomide; BLM: belimumab; Pred: prednisone; HCQ: hydroxychloroquine; T2T: treat-to-target; mLLDAS: modified lupus low disease activity state. *Other IS including tripterygium glycoside, tacrolimus, thalidomide and tofacitinib.

Supporting image 2Table 1. Patient characteristics in the rituximab and conventional immunosuppressant groups before and after IPTW. Data are mean (SD) or number (%) of patients. IPTW: inverse probability of treatment weighting; SLEDAI-2K: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000; BILAG: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group; IS: immunosuppressants; APL: antiphospholipid antibody; Prednisonemax(mg/day): The highest daily dose of intravenous methylprednisolone administered during the initial hospitalization period; Methylprednisolone pulse (%): Proportion of patients who received intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy, defined as ≥500 mg/day for 3 to 5 consecutive days, during the initial hospitalization period.

Supporting image 3Figure 2. Treat-to-target outcomes. Attainment of mLLDAS (A) and remission (B) within 12 months in the whole cohort and sensitivity analyses (rituximab versus conventional immunosuppressants group). The model was adjusted for age, gender and maximum prednisone dosage. Pre-November 2019 (no COVID-19 exposure): Patients who completed their 12-month follow-up before November 2019. Post-November 2019 (COVID-19 exposure): Patients who completed their 12-month follow-up after November 2019. CI: Confidence interval; mLLDAS: modified lupus low disease activity state; SLEDAI-2K: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000. Neuro: Neuropsychiatric; HR: Hazard ratio. At 12-month, follow-up data were missing for 12 out of 258 patients (4.6%) (3 in the RTX group and 9 in the conventional IS group). The last observation carries forward (LOCF) method was employed to address the missing data in the endpoint assessment by 12-month.


Disclosures: H. Wang: None; L. Zhao: None; S. Ye: None; S. Yang: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wang H, Zhao L, Ye S, Yang S. Rituximab as the first line treatment in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rituximab-as-the-first-line-treatment-in-newly-diagnosed-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rituximab-as-the-first-line-treatment-in-newly-diagnosed-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology