ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2244

Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Gout

Seoyoung C. Kim1, Jun Liu2 and Daniel H. Solomon3, 1Div. of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Div. of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Epidemiologic methods, gout, osteoarthritis and population studies

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster III (ACR): Gout and Non-Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Conditions

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:
Atrial fibrillation
(AF) is the most common arrhythmia associated with cardiovascular disease and
mortality. There are increasing data supporting the role of inflammation in the
development and maintenance of AF. Recent observational studies report an
increased risk of sinus tachycardia, AF and left atrial thrombus in patients
with hyperuricemia, but little is known whether gout is associated with the
risk of AF.

Methods: Using data from a US commercial
insurance plan (2004-2013), we conducted a cohort study to evaluate the
incidence rate (IR) of AF in patients with gout compared to osteoarthritis (OA).
Patients with gout or OA were identified with ≥2 diagnosis codes and
≥1 dispensing for a gout- or OA-related drug. The index date was defined
as the date of the first dispensing of a gout or OA-related drug (i.e. NSAIDs,
opioids) after ≥365-days continuous enrollment. We excluded patients with a diagnosis of arrhythmia or cardiac
surgery, or who used anti-arrhythmics or anticoagulants in the 365-day
period prior to the index date. The OA group was then matched to the gout group
on age, sex and the index date with a 3:1 ratio. Incident AF was defined as a
new AF diagnosis and a dispensing for a new anticoagulant or
anti-arrhythmic. Baseline ESR, CRP and serum uric acid levels were available on
a subgroup of patients. We calculated the incidence rates (IR) of AF and confidence
intervals (CI) in both groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models
compared the risk of AF in gout versus OA.  

Results:
We identified 70,015 patients
with gout and 210,045 with OA, matched on age, sex, and the index date. The
mean age was 57 years and 81% were men. Among patients with baseline ESR,CRP or
uric acid levels available, 35.5% of gout and 23.4% of OA patients had elevated
ESR or CRP levels and the mean (SD) uric acid level (in mg/dL) was 7.4 (2.0) in
gout and 5.9 (1.4) in OA. Over the mean 2-year follow-up, the IR of AF per
1,000 person-years was 7.19 in gout and 5.87 in OA. The age and sex-adjusted HR
of AF was 1.23 (95%CI 1.14-1.32) in gout versus OA. In the multivariable Cox
regression adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, medications and healthcare
utilization, the HR of AF in gout was 1.13 (95%CI 1.04-1.23).  In the subgroup
analyses, the HR of AF in gout was 1.22 (95%CI 0.81-1.84) further adjusted for
elevated ESR/CRP and 1.57 (95%CI 1.04-2.36) further adjusted for serum uric
acid levels.

Conclusion:
In this large
population-based cohort study, gout was associated with a modestly increased
risk of incident AF versus OA. It may be important to examine the role of gout
treatment such as xanthine oxidase inhibitors and colchicine in the primary or
secondary prevention of AF in patients with gout. 

Table. Risk of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with gout compared to those with OA. 

Adjustment

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

Main analysis

 

Age, sex

1.23 (1.14-1.32)

Age, sex, comorbidity score and number of prescription drugs

1.19 (1.11-1.28)

Final model a

1.13 (1.04-1.23)

 

 

Subgroup analysis

 

Final model + elevated ESR or CRP  level b

1.22 (0.81-1.84)

Final model + serum uric acid level c

1.57 (1.04-2.36)

a The final model includes age, sex, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, other comorbidities, comorbidity index, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin 2 receptor blockers, and other medications, and health care utilization factors.

b This analysis was done in a subgroup of patients with baseline ESR or CRP levels (n=15,174).

 c This analysis was done in a subgroup of patients with baseline uric acid levels (n=20,622).

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: S. C. Kim, Pfizer Inc, 2,AstraZeneca, 2,Lilly, 2,Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc., 2; J. Liu, None; D. H. Solomon, Lilly, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,AstraZeneca, 2,Amgen, 2,Corrona, 2,Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc., 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kim SC, Liu J, Solomon DH. Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-incident-atrial-fibrillation-in-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-incident-atrial-fibrillation-in-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology