ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0818

Risk of Cardiovascular Events is Higher in Pregabalin Users Versus Duloxetine: A Cohort Study Among Veterans with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Sachalee Campbell1, Laura Daniel2, Puran Nepa2, Otis Wilson3, Alyson L. Dickson3, Katherine Murray3, William D. Dupont3, Adriana Hung3, Wayne A. Ray3, Michael Stein4 and Cecilia P. Chung2, 1University of Miami, Miami, FL, 2University of Miami, Research Service, Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL, 3Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt, TN, 4Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Myocardial Infarction, pain, Pharmacoepidemiology, Stroke

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Pain in Rheumatic Disease Including Fibromyalgia (0813–0818)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:15PM-4:30PM

Background/Purpose: Pregabalin and duloxetine are among the most prescribed non-opioid medications for patients with chronic pain. Pregabalin may raise the risk for heart failure, and duloxetine increases heart rate and blood pressure; however, little is known about their comparative cardiovascular safety. This study aimed to compare cardiovascular outcomes between new users of pregabalin and duloxetine in US Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal conditions.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of US Veterans, ages 18-89 years, with chronic non-cancer musculoskeletal pain who were new users of pregabalin or duloxetine between 2014 and 2021. We excluded Veterans who were in long-term care or hospice, hospitalized for a month or more, and afflicted with serious illnesses in the year before their first prescription. The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) – a composite of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, or cardiac death. For mortality causes, we used data from the National Death Index. For cardiac events, we used Veterans Affairs (VA) data and linked Medicare data. We created a propensity score using 153 covariates from ICD codes based on literature review and past studies and used it to adjust for confounding with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze outcomes over time.

Results: This study included 26,684 new users of pregabalin and 152,808 new users of duloxetine. The cohort was predominantly male (83%) and of reported White race (70%). The median age was 56 years old for both medications (IQR:44-67 for pregabalin, 42-67 for duloxetine). Prior to IPTW, rates of neuropathic pain, diabetes, and hypertension were higher among users of pregabalin, whereas rates of stress and anxiety were higher in users of duloxetine. Following IPTW, all covariates were balanced, indicated by standardized differences of less than one percent. During the study period, there were 1,798 MACE events. Follow-up time was 17,978 patient-years for pregabalin users and 123,134 patient-years for duloxetine users. The rate of MACE was higher for pregabalin users when compared to duloxetine users [unadjusted HR: 1.61 (CI: 1.43, 1.81), adjusted HR: 1.23 (CI: 1.08, 1.40)]. These differences were explained by higher rates of congestive heart failure and acute myocardial infarction among pregabalin users compared to duloxetine users.

Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort study of US Veterans ages 18-89 with chronic non-cancer musculoskeletal pain, new users of pregabalin had an increased risk of heart failure and acute myocardial infarction compared to new users of duloxetine.

Supporting image 1Rates of cardiovascular outcomes in new users of pregabalin vs duloxetine


Disclosures: S. Campbell: None; L. Daniel: None; P. Nepa: None; O. Wilson: None; A. Dickson: None; K. Murray: None; W. Dupont: None; A. Hung: None; W. Ray: None; M. Stein: None; C. Chung: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Campbell S, Daniel L, Nepa P, Wilson O, Dickson A, Murray K, Dupont W, Hung A, Ray W, Stein M, Chung C. Risk of Cardiovascular Events is Higher in Pregabalin Users Versus Duloxetine: A Cohort Study Among Veterans with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-cardiovascular-events-is-higher-in-pregabalin-users-versus-duloxetine-a-cohort-study-among-veterans-with-chronic-musculoskeletal-pain/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-cardiovascular-events-is-higher-in-pregabalin-users-versus-duloxetine-a-cohort-study-among-veterans-with-chronic-musculoskeletal-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology