ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2781

Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Associated with the Use of Glucocorticoids in Patients with Incident Systemic Lupus Erytematosus: A Population-based Study

Lingyi Li1, Hui Xie 2, Eric Sayre 1 and J. Antonio Avina-Zubieta 3, 1Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Canada and Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Arthritis Research Canada and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: glucocorticoids and cardiovascular disease, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: 5T093: SLE – Clinical V: Emerging Knowledge of Current Treatments (2780–2785)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). SLE itself predisposes patients to accelerated atherosclerosis. In addition, the risk of CVD may be due to effects of drugs used to treat SLE, particularly glucocorticoid (GC). However, population-based studies assessing the risk of CVD associated with the use of GC with proper adjustment of time-varying confounders that might be also acting as intermediary variables in patients with newly diagnosed SLE are limited. We aim to address this question and the idea that recency of GC use may impact the effect.

Methods: Our data included all outpatient and inpatient visits, demographic data, cancer registry and vital statistics from Jan 1990 to Mar 2015 and all dispensed medication from Sept 1995 to Mar 2015 in the province of British Columbia, Canada. Using a previously validated SLE case definition, we assembled an incident cohort of all SLE patients who received health care between January 01 1997 and March 31 2015 with no exposure to GC before SLE onset. CVD events (myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke) were identified using both hospitalization and vital statistics data. Individuals were followed until they experienced a CVD outcome, died, left BC, or follow-up ended, whichever occurred first. We used the marginal structure Cox model to estimate the impact of the GC initiation on the risk of CVD, adjusting for both baseline and time-dependent covariates (including health resource utilization and relevant medications (listed in table1)) that were updated every three months during follow-up. We defined GC exposure in four more ways: current use (yes/no), current dose (mg/day), cumulative dose (grams), cumulative duration (months). All were used as time-dependent variables. To permit the effect of a GC use in the past 180 days to vary by its recency, we created weighted versions of the cumulative dose and duration (i.e., straight-line, concave, convex, and half-normal weighting function).  Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of CVD of these GC exposure measures.

Results: We identified 2,653 incident SLE patients with no GC use history at baseline (mean age 47, 86% females). During follow-up, 1,720 (65%) received GC. GC users spend an average 15% of their follow-up time on GC with a median dose of 5 mg/day and a median duration per GC course of 29 days. During follow-up, we identified 108 CVD events (MI 69; stroke 45). Using marginal structure model, the hazard ratio (HR) after GC initiation was 1.82 (95%CI; 1.18-2.81) adjusted for baseline and time-dependent variables. Current GC use and current daily dose were associated with significantly increased risk of CVD (HR; 1.76 (95%CI; 1.06-2.94) and 1.14 (95%CI; 1.03-1.26)) (Table 2).  Concave function for both cumulative dose and cumulative duration of use were selected as the best weighting function with the smallest AIC. Both of them were statistically significant (HR: 1.59 (95% CI; 1.23-2.05) and 1.21 (95% CI; 1.04-1.41)).

Conclusion: We found that the initiation of GC use is associated an 82% increased risk of CVD during follow-up. Higher risk of CVD is also associated with current GC use, higher current and cumulative GC dose and longer duration of GC use.


GC-CVD table1

Table1. Baseline characteristics of the incident SLE cohort


GC-CVD table2

Table2. Unadjusted and adjusted cox regression models assessing the effects of the different GC exposure measures on the risk of CVD


Disclosure: L. Li, None; H. Xie, None; E. Sayre, None; J. Avina-Zubieta, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Li L, Xie H, Sayre E, Avina-Zubieta J. Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Associated with the Use of Glucocorticoids in Patients with Incident Systemic Lupus Erytematosus: A Population-based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-cardiovascular-disease-associated-with-the-use-of-glucocorticoids-in-patients-with-incident-systemic-lupus-erytematosus-a-population-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-cardiovascular-disease-associated-with-the-use-of-glucocorticoids-in-patients-with-incident-systemic-lupus-erytematosus-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology