ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0737

Rheumatologic Rashes in Different Skin Types and Confidence in Diagnosis Among Internal Medicine Residents in a New York City Hospital

Nana Jinjolava, Jose Cano, Gopisree Peringeth, Adhya Mehta and Tariq Syed, NYCHH - Jacobi Medical Center - Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Minority Health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Health Services Research Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatologic conditions such as lupus and others tend to present more aggressively in patients of Hispanic and African American ethnicity. There are multiple reasons why it is difficult to recognize dermatological manifestation in people of color. It could be due to varied presentation, lack of representation in medical textbooks, educational curricula, and web-based medical resources which have been proven in multiple studies. (1,2) Ignoring skin manifestations can lead to delay in diagnosis contributing to morbidity and mortality in patients. Our study goals were to calculate the self-reported confidence levels of residents in diagnosing various skin lesions across different Fitzpatrick skin types. As well as explore the reasons for difficulty in diagnosing rashes in people of color among a diverse group of residents catering to a population composed of predominantly African- American and Hispanic ethnicity.

Methods: We created and distributed a survey among internal medicine residents in a city hospital in the Bronx, to further characterize the level of confidence that they have towards diagnosing common rheumatologic related rashes in different types of skin. Aside from demographic personal information, subjects were asked to grade on a scale from 1 to 5 how confident they feel recognizing these rashes on the different types of skins based on the Fitzpatrick classification (Type 1 to 6). Descriptive statistics were used to express the percentage of residents feeling either confident (options 3-4-5 from the Likert scale) or not confident (options 1-2 from the Likert scale) based on the different skin types as well as the reasons affecting their confidence. Median and Means were used to describe continuous and ordinal variables.

Results: 27 residents in various stages of training responded to the survey. The percentage of responders who are confident about diagnosing various skin lesions in different Fitzpatrick skin types is tabulated in table 1. Across all lesions, a higher percentage was confident about diagnosing the lesions in lighter skin color (Fitzpatrick type 1-4) compared to darker skin (type 5-6). Consistent with this trend the median self-reported confidence score on Likert scale was higher in type skin compared to type 6 skin (Table 2). Lesser number of respondents were confident about diagnosing heliotrope rash and shawl sign compared to other lesions. This trend remained similar across all skin types. 74.1% percent of responders identified a lack of visual exposure during training and 77% identified lack of experience as the most common reason for the lack of confidence in making a diagnosis. 51.8 % identified skin color, 25.9 % identified lack of interest in the field and 14.8% identified lack of theoretical knowledge.

Conclusion: In general terms for the most common skin findings in rheumatologic conditions, confidence level are lower for darker tones of skin. The most common reasons attributed to these findings were lack of experience, lack of visual exposure. Training with more educational materials in darker skin color can be targeted to improve the confidence level in identifying skin lesions in darker skin.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Percentage of responders who are confident about diagnosing various skin lesions in different Fitzpatrick skin types (n=27)

Supporting image 2

Table 2: Comparison of median confidence score between Fitzpatrick type 1 and type 6 skin across different skin lesions.

Supporting image 3

Figure 1: Reason for lack of confidence in diagnosing common skin lesions in rheumatologic disease


Disclosures: N. Jinjolava, None; J. Cano, None; G. Peringeth, None; A. Mehta, None; T. Syed, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jinjolava N, Cano J, Peringeth G, Mehta A, Syed T. Rheumatologic Rashes in Different Skin Types and Confidence in Diagnosis Among Internal Medicine Residents in a New York City Hospital [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologic-rashes-in-different-skin-types-and-confidence-in-diagnosis-among-internal-medicine-residents-in-a-new-york-city-hospital/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologic-rashes-in-different-skin-types-and-confidence-in-diagnosis-among-internal-medicine-residents-in-a-new-york-city-hospital/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology