ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1658

Rheumatoid Factor Status Affects the Efficacy of First Biological Treatment in RA

Yoshikazu Ogawa1, Nobunori Takahashi2, Koji Funahashi2, Shuji Asai3, Toki Takemoto3, Tatsuo Watanabe3, Nobuyuki Asai2, Naoki Ishiguro4 and Toshihisa Kojima2, 1orthopedic surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, 3Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, 4Department of Orthopedic Suregery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: activity score and treatment, Biologic agents, Biologics, Rheumatoid Factor

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Rheumatoid factor (RF) is considered an
important factor in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The association
between the treatment efficacy of biological agents and RF status (negative or
positive) is unclear; therefore, in the present study, we elucidated whether
pretreatment RF examination outcomes affect the efficacy of first biological
treatment in RA.

Methods:

The records of relevant patients with RA
were derived from Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry (TBCR) where the
department of Nagoya University and 20 affiliated hospitals in Japan are
enrolled. The relevant data of a total of 707 patients with RA who met the 2010
ACR–EULAR classification criteria for RA were recorded with regard to both pre-
and post-biological treatment DAS28ESR; the RF status was divided into negative
(0–15 U/ml) or positive (>15 U/ml). RF-negative patients (n = 118) and
RF-positive patients (n = 589) were compared with regard to the effect of the
RF status on biological treatment. Only bio-naïve patients were included in
this study, and those who received second or latter biological treatment were
excluded. We analyzed the relevant data using the analysis of covariance method
(ANCOVA), with pretreatment DAS28ESR as the covariate.

Results:

The demographic characteristics of each
group at baseline are presented in Table 1. Pretreatment DAS28ESR was
significantly associated with DAS28ESR improvement, with a higher pretreatment
DAS28ESR corresponding to larger DAS28ESR improvement (p < 0.01; Figure 1).
Pretreatment DAS28ESR was 5.07 in RF-negative patients and 5.34 in RF-positive
patients, with DAS28ESR improvement of 2.25 and 2.09, respectively.
Compensating each DAS28ESR according to pretreatment value using ANCOVA, DAS28ESR
improvement was 2.40 in RF-negative patients and 2.06 in RF-positive patients,
respectively, and the difference was significant (p < 0.05; Table 2).

Conclusion:

The RF status significantly affected
DAS28ESR improvement in the first biological treatment. Additionally, the
efficacy of the first biological treatment in RF-positive patients was inferior
to that in RF-negative patients with RA.

 


Disclosure: Y. Ogawa, None; N. Takahashi, None; K. Funahashi, None; S. Asai, None; T. Takemoto, None; T. Watanabe, None; N. Asai, None; N. Ishiguro, None; T. Kojima, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ogawa Y, Takahashi N, Funahashi K, Asai S, Takemoto T, Watanabe T, Asai N, Ishiguro N, Kojima T. Rheumatoid Factor Status Affects the Efficacy of First Biological Treatment in RA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-factor-status-affects-the-efficacy-of-first-biological-treatment-in-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-factor-status-affects-the-efficacy-of-first-biological-treatment-in-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology