ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 433

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Biologic Switching and Cycling in a Large US Managed Care Population

Machaon Bonafede1, Jeffrey R. Curtis2, Donna McMorrow1, Chieh-I Chen3 and George J. Joseph4, 1Truven Health Analytics, Cambridge, MA, 2Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, 4Global Health Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR), Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologics, Clinical practice, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treatment and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: A majority of RA patients who switch from a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to another biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) are TNFi cyclers (Bonafede M et al. Adv Ther 2012;29:664-74). The objective of this study was to examine subsequent biologic switching among RA patients in a large US managed care population after they switched between two TNFi (“TNFi cyclers”), between a TNFi and a non-TNFi, or between two non-TNFi.

Methods: Index claims from January 2010 to June 2014 were analyzed from the Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial database. The “index claim” was the first claim for a biologic DMARD or tofacitinib. Patients were required to be ages 18-64 years at index with ≥12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment pre- and post-index, ≥1 claim for RA (ICD-9-CM 714.0x) at baseline (pre-index) or within 30 days post-index, ≥1 claim for a different biologic at baseline, no claim for the index agent at baseline, and no claim for any other autoimmune condition. Patients who switched therapy again within 6 months or within 12 months after the index date were categorized based on baseline and index therapy.

Results: Of the 7304 patients who met the selection criteria, 82.1% were female. Mean age was 50.1 years (SD=9.5) and mean Deyo Charlson Comorbidity Index Score was 1.4 (SD=0.9). A total of 4764 (65.2%) patients were TNFi cyclers, 1826 (25.0%) switched from a baseline TNFi to an index non-TNFi, 418 (5.7%) switched from a baseline non-TNFi to an index TNFi, and 296 (4.1%) switched from a baseline non-TNFi to an index non-TNFi. Mean age at index was similar across cohorts (49.5 to 51.9 years); 80.9% to 84.5% of patients in each cohort were female. The table summarizes the proportion of patients who switched therapy again in the first 6 or 12 months post-index. For patients who switched from a baseline TNFi to an index non-TNFi, compared with TNFi cyclers, the odds ratio for switching therapy again was 0.619 (95% CI: 0.53, 0.72; p<0.01) within 6 months and 0.824 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.93; p<0.01) within 12 months.

Conclusion: RA patients who switch biologic therapy frequently switch again within 12 months. Compared with patients who switch between two TNFi (TNFi cyclers), patients who switch from a TNFi to a non-TNFi are less likely to switch therapy again within 6 or 12 months.

Table. Proportion of Patients Who Switched Therapy Again After the Index Date.

Baseline and Index Therapy

Switched Again Within

6 Months, n (%)

Switched Again Within

12 Months, n (%)

TNFi to TNFi (“TNFi cyclers”) (N=4764)

910 (19.1)

1,616 (33.9)

TNFi to non-TNFi (N=1826)

233 (12.8)*

543 (29.7)*

Non-TNFi to TNFi (N=418)

75 (17.9)

134 (32.1)

Non-TNFi to non-TNFi (N=296)

34 (11.5)*

73 (24.7)*

*p < 0.01 compared with TNFi cyclers.

Jonathan Latham of PharmaScribe, LLC provided medical writing assistance.


Disclosure: M. Bonafede, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 2,Regeneron, 2; J. R. Curtis, Roche, Genentech, UCB Pharma, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 2,Roche, Genentech, UCB Pharma, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 5; D. McMorrow, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 2,Regeneron, 2; C. I. Chen, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1,Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 3; G. J. Joseph, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 1,Amgen, 1,Pfizer Inc, 1,Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bonafede M, Curtis JR, McMorrow D, Chen CI, Joseph GJ. Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Biologic Switching and Cycling in a Large US Managed Care Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-biologic-switching-and-cycling-in-a-large-us-managed-care-population/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-biologic-switching-and-cycling-in-a-large-us-managed-care-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology