ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2280

Reproductive Health Intention Screening in Women with Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Low Uptake and Gender-Specific Provider Patterns Following a Standardized Intervention

Katherine Pryor1, Bill Albert 2, Susan Ritter 3, Laura Tarter 3, Jonathan Coblyn 3, Bonnie Bermas 4, Caryn Dutton 3, Lydia Pace 3, Elizabeth Janiak 3 and Candace Feldman 5, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brookline, 2Power to Decide, Washington, DC, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, 4UT Southwestern, Dallas, 5Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: pregnancy and practice improvement, Reproductive Health, Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Reproductive Issues In Rheumatic Disorders Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Reproductive health intention screening is critical in women with systemic rheumatic diseases, as both disease activity and medication use can impact pregnancy outcomes. However, studies report that < 50% of patients with rheumatic diseases receive contraception counseling. We introduced a simple reproductive health intention screen, One Key Question ® (OKQ), to our academic rheumatology practice and examined subsequent practice patterns.

Methods: We developed an electronic medical record (EMR) smart phrase with OKQ (“Would you like to become pregnant in the next year?”) with responses that would prompt documentation of contraception, teratogenic medication use and referrals for OB/GYN care when appropriate. Reproductive age (18-50 year-old), female patients with a systemic rheumatic disease were flagged in the EMR for screening before appointments. We introduced OKQ at Rheumatology Grand Rounds, in email notifications, and with exam room reminder cards. Documentation of OKQ was at the rheumatologists’ discretion. We measured reproductive health intention screening over 6 months following introduction of OKQ, conducted chart reviews, and used descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model to compare patients who were screened (with OKQ or other documentation) vs. a randomly selected subset of patients who had been flagged for screening but did not have OKQ documented.

Results: Over the 6-month pilot with 43 rheumatologists (56% female), among 1092 reproductive age women with rheumatic diseases, 11 providers (82% female) used OKQ to document reproductive health preferences for 83 women (8%). In the subset of 96 charts flagged for screening but without OKQ documented, 15 providers (67% female) documented reproductive health screening (without OKQ) for 18/96 women (19%).  Patients had 2.4 times higher odds of being screened if they saw a female vs. male rheumatologist (95% CI 1.21-4.85). OKQ use resulted in documentation of a broader range of reproductive health topics by rheumatologists of both genders (Figure 1). Adjusting for provider gender, a 1-year increase in patient age was associated with 5% lower odds of screening (95% CI 0.02-0.09). Highly effective contraception was associated with reproductive health screening (p< 0.0001). Although use of a high-risk medication was not associated with screening (p=0.22) (Table 1), rheumatologists who screened their patients were more likely to document risks of teratogenic medications (p< 0.0001).

Conclusion: Despite introducing a simple, standardized intervention, < 10% of reproductive age women with rheumatic diseases were comprehensively screened using OKQ, < 20% of an eligible subset were asked selected reproductive health-related questions, and >50% of unscreened patients had no documented contraception. Younger age and seeing a female rheumatologist resulted in higher odds of screening. While some providers may have screened patients without documenting the response, the data suggest that a high proportion of patients are not being screened. While uptake was suboptimal, this intervention improved the depth and breadth of reproductive health documentation among those who were screened.


Table 1

Table 1

Figure 1


Disclosure: K. Pryor, None; B. Albert, Power to Decide, 3; S. Ritter, None; L. Tarter, None; J. Coblyn, None; B. Bermas, None; C. Dutton, None; L. Pace, None; E. Janiak, None; C. Feldman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pryor K, Albert B, Ritter S, Tarter L, Coblyn J, Bermas B, Dutton C, Pace L, Janiak E, Feldman C. Reproductive Health Intention Screening in Women with Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Low Uptake and Gender-Specific Provider Patterns Following a Standardized Intervention [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reproductive-health-intention-screening-in-women-with-systemic-rheumatic-diseases-low-uptake-and-gender-specific-provider-patterns-following-a-standardized-intervention/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reproductive-health-intention-screening-in-women-with-systemic-rheumatic-diseases-low-uptake-and-gender-specific-provider-patterns-following-a-standardized-intervention/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology