ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1515

Renal Responder Status and Associated Clinical Variables in the Lupus Accelerating Medicines Partnership Cohort

Philip Carlucci1, Andrea Fava2, Kristina Deonaraine1, Jessica Li3, David Wofsy4, Judith James5, Chaim Putterman6, Betty Diamond7, Derek Fine8, Jose Monroy-Trujillo8, Kristin Haag8, William Apruzzese9, H. Michael Belmont10, Peter Izmirly11, Sean Connery12, Fernanda Payan-Schober12, Richard Furie13, Celine Berthier14, Maria Dall'Era15, Kerry Cho16, Diane Kamen17, Kenneth Kalunian18, The Accelerating Medicines Partnership in SLE Network19, Michelle Petri20 and Jill Buyon21, 1New York University School of Medicine, New York, 2Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, 3Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 4University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 5Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, 6Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 7Northwell Health, Hartford, 8Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 9., Boston, 10NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, 11Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 12Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, 13Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, NY, 14University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 15Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 16University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 17Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 18School of Health Sciences, University of California, La Jolla, 19Multiple Institutions, Multiple Cities, 20Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, Renal, Response Criteria, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes III: Lupus Nephritis (1512–1516)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-4:50PM

Background/Purpose: Poor therapeutic response rates contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with lupus nephritis. Early identification of patients likely to respond is crucial as delays in treatment associate with worse outcomes. This study evaluated response using prospectively collected data obtained from the multi-ethnic/racial, multi-center Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) lupus nephritis cohort. This cohort represents a real-world clinical setting using provider chosen standard of care and uniform collection of data.

Methods: This study included SLE patients based on ACR or SLICC classification enrolled in AMP who met the following criteria: urine protein-creatine ratio (UPCR) > 1 at entry, and histologic biopsy Class III, IV, V, or mixed. Patients were followed at 3, 12, 26 and 52 wks with demographics, history, laboratory results, disease activity, and medications recorded at each visit. Follow up data were available for 136 patients at 26 wks and 118 at 52 wks. Complete response was defined as a reduction in UPCR to < .5, a normal serum creatinine or no greater than 125% of baseline, and < 10 mg prednisone at time of response assessment. Patients were partial responders if UPCR decreased > 50% but remained >.5 and nonresponders if < 50% reduction in UPCR and/or did not meet the other response criteria.

Results: Medications were reported at 12 wks (Table 1). The complete response rate was 26% at both 26 and 52 wks. For patients undergoing a first biopsy, the rates were 37% and 40% and for those with repeat biopsies, the rates were lower at 21% and 19% respectively (p=0.042 at 26 wks; p=0.015 at 52 wks). The complete response at 26 wks was generally sustained with only 4 of 27 patients experiencing a relapse at 52 wks. At 26 wks, patients with membranous histology were less likely to be complete responders than patients with proliferative histology.

This trend was observed regardless of biopsy number and persisted for response status at 52 wks. Although baseline activity score did not predict responder status, complete responders had a significantly lower chronicity index than nonresponders (mean + SD, 2.26 + 2.22 vs 3.83 + 2.57, p=0.016) at 26 wks with similar results at 52 wks. Responder status at 26 and 52 wks whether first or repeat biopsy was independent of extrarenal disease at entry (Table 2). Complete responder status was associated with positive anti-dsDNA serology at baseline for repeat biopsy patients. Complete responders had a greater change in C3, hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, albumin, and UPCR at 12 wks compared to baseline values than nonresponders (Table 3). Similar trends were observed when considering response status at 52 wks.

Conclusion: The low complete response rates reported in the AMP cohort are consistent with findings in blinded controlled trials of standard-of-care therapies and support the critical need for new therapeutics particularly in patients undergoing repeat biopsies and those with increased chronicity.

Table 1: Medications received at 12 weeks by responder status. 2-way p-values compare nonresponders to complete responders

Table 2: Baseline characteristics by response status at 26 weeks. 2-way p-values compare nonresponders to complete responders. *Excludes points for low complement, anti-dsDNA positivity, hematuria, pyuria, proteinuria, and casts

Table 3: Change in laboratory values at 12 weeks compared to baseline by response status. Data are presented as median [IQR], 2-way p-values compare nonresponders to complete responders. *Includes only patients who had low complement at baseline.


Disclosure: P. Carlucci, None; A. Fava, None; K. Deonaraine, None; J. Li, None; D. Wofsy, GlaxoSmithKline, 9, Novartis, 9, Principia, 5; J. James, None; C. Putterman, Equillium, 1, 2; B. Diamond, None; D. Fine, GSK, 5; J. Monroy-Trujillo, None; K. Haag, None; W. Apruzzese, None; H. Belmont, Exagen, 5; P. Izmirly, GSK, 5; S. Connery, None; F. Payan-Schober, None; R. Furie, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, 2, 5; C. Berthier, None; M. Dall'Era, Janssen, 5, AstraZeneca, 5; K. Cho, None; D. Kamen, None; K. Kalunian, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Equillium, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, ILTOO, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lupus Research Alliance, 2, 5, Nektar, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Sanford Consortium, 2, 5, Vielabio, 2, 5; T. Accelerating Medicines Partnership in SLE Network, None; M. Petri, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, BMS, 5, Decision Resources, 5, GSK, 2, 5, INOVA, 5, IQVIA, 5, Janssen, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Merck EMD Serono, 5, Sanofi Japan, 5, Thermofisher, 5, UCB, 5, Exagen, 2; J. Buyon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Carlucci P, Fava A, Deonaraine K, Li J, Wofsy D, James J, Putterman C, Diamond B, Fine D, Monroy-Trujillo J, Haag K, Apruzzese W, Belmont H, Izmirly P, Connery S, Payan-Schober F, Furie R, Berthier C, Dall'Era M, Cho K, Kamen D, Kalunian K, Accelerating Medicines Partnership in SLE Network T, Petri M, Buyon J. Renal Responder Status and Associated Clinical Variables in the Lupus Accelerating Medicines Partnership Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/renal-responder-status-and-associated-clinical-variables-in-the-lupus-accelerating-medicines-partnership-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/renal-responder-status-and-associated-clinical-variables-in-the-lupus-accelerating-medicines-partnership-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology