ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2868

Relative Efficacy of Adalimumab Versus Secukinumab in Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Keith A. Betts1, Manish Mittal2, Avani Joshi2, Jinlin Song1 and Yanjun Bao2, 1Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, 2AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Adalimumab, comparative effectiveness and harms and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The phase 3 FUTURE 1 and FUTURE
2 trials demonstrated efficacy of secukinumab (SEC) for active psoriatic
arthritis (PsA).  However, there is limited data comparing the effectiveness of
SEC with established PsA treatments.  This study compared the relative efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) 40mg versus SEC
150mg and 300mg for the treatment of PsA.

Methods:  An indirect comparison was
conducted using individual patient data from the ADA pivotal trial (ADEPT) and
published data from FUTURE 1 and 2. To adjust for the cross-trial differences, individual
patients in ADEPT were re-weighted to match the mean baseline characteristics in
the FUTURE trials.1,2 Specifically, age, weight, gender, race, baseline
methotrexate use, psoriasis ≥ 3% body surface area, baseline PASI score,
presence of dactylitis and enthesitis, and HAQ-DI were included in the baseline
matching. The ACR 20/50/70 and PASI 75/90 response rates relative to placebo at
week 24 were compared. Numbers needed to treat (NNTs) to achieve one additional
ACR 20 and PASI 75 responder were also calculated.

Results: After matching, mean baseline
characteristics were balanced across the ADEPT and FUTURE 1 and 2 trial
populations.  For all outcomes, ADA demonstrated a higher relative efficacy to
placebo when compared to SEC 150mg (n=302) (Figure 1). Specifically, the mean
differences (95% confidence interval) between ADA and SEC 150mg in relative ACR
20/50/70 response rates were 9.5% (-4.3%, 23.3%), 3.0% (-10.1%, 16.0%), and
6.0% (-4.4%, 16.5%), respectively. The mean differences in relative PASI 75/90
response rates were 13.1% (-0.5%, 26.7%) and 6.7% (-6.4%, 19.9%). Similarly,
ACR 20/50/70 and PASI 75 were higher with ADA vs SEC 300mg (n=100) (Figure 2).
The NNTs to achieve one additional ACR 20 responder were 2.3 for ADA vs 3.0 for
SEC 150mg and 2.7 for SEC 300mg.  The NNTs to achieve one additional PASI75
responder were also lower for ADA (1.7) vs SEC 150mg (2.2) and SEC 300mg (1.9).

Conclusion: In the absence of head to head
trials comparing ADA and SEC,
the current indirect comparison which adjusts for differences across trial
populations provides
valuable and reliable evidence for physicians and payers. After adjusting for
cross-trial differences in baseline characteristics, ADA was associated with higher
relative ACR and PASI rates and lower NNTs compared with SEC 150mg or 300mg at
week 24 among patients with PsA.

1 Signorovitch
et al. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28 (10): 935-945.

2 Signorovitch et
al. Value in Health 2012; 15 (6), 940-947.

Figure 1
ACR 20/50/70 and PASI 75/90 relative to placebo of ADA 40mg vs. SEC 150mg

Figure 2
ACR 20/50/70 and PASI 75/90 relative to placebo of ADA 40mg vs. SEC 300mg

 


Disclosure: K. A. Betts, AbbVie, 5; M. Mittal, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; A. Joshi, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; J. Song, AbbVie, 5; Y. Bao, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Betts KA, Mittal M, Joshi A, Song J, Bao Y. Relative Efficacy of Adalimumab Versus Secukinumab in Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relative-efficacy-of-adalimumab-versus-secukinumab-in-active-psoriatic-arthritis-a-matching-adjusted-indirect-comparison/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relative-efficacy-of-adalimumab-versus-secukinumab-in-active-psoriatic-arthritis-a-matching-adjusted-indirect-comparison/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology