ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2382

Relationships Between DAS28 Response and Clinical, Functional and Radiographic Outcomes in Year 2 of the COMET Study of Etanercept in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Paul Emery1, Ferdinand Breedveld 2, Ronald Pedersen 3, Eduardo Jose Campos 4, Annette Szumski 5 and Tomohiro Hirose 4, 1Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Pfizer, Collegeville, 4Pfizer Japan Inc, Toyko, Japan, 5Syneos Health, Princeton, NJ

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: etanercept, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster III: Safety and Outcomes

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are treated with etanercept (ETN) plus methotrexate (MTX), dosing down of ETN or withdrawal of MTX are options once treat-to-target has been achieved. In the COMET study1 (NCT00195494), patients with RA received combination therapy (50 mg/week ETN+MTX) for 52 weeks in Period (P) 1, and were then randomized to either continue combination therapy or discontinue MTX and receive ETN monotherapy for a further 52 weeks (P2). The purpose of this analysis was to compare Week 104 clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes between treatment arms for each patient subgroup, classified by disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) response (achievement or not of DAS28 low disease activity [LDA; DAS28 score ≤3.2] or remission [DAS28 score < 2.6]).

Methods: Odds ratios (ORs) comparing the ETN+MTX and ETN P2 treatment arms for each Week 52 DAS28 status were calculated from logistic regression models with treatment, Week 52 DAS28 status, and their interaction as predictors of achieving DAS28 LDA, DAS28 remission, normal Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (score ≤0.5), and radiographic non-progression (change from Year 2 baseline in modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS] of ≤0.5) at Week 104.

Results: A total of 208 patients (105 in the ETN+MTX and 103 in the ETN monotherapy P2 treatment arms, respectively) were included in this analysis. The odds of achieving DAS28 LDA, DAS28 remission, or normal HAQ-DI at Week 104 in patients who did or did not achieve a DAS28 response at Week 52 did not generally differ significantly between the treatment groups (Figure, Panels A-C), which could be attributed, at least in part, to lack of power to detect treatment differences due to small sample sizes (36 [ETN+MTX] and 28 [ETN] patients were in the Week 52 LDA non-response category while 51 [ETN+MTX] and 40 [ETN] patients were in the remission non-responder category). The only exception was the significantly higher odds of achieving radiographic non-progression in patients treated with ETN+MTX vs ETN monotherapy who did not achieve a DAS28 response at Week 52 (Figure, Panel D). Although the overall lack of significant ORs suggests that there were almost no differences between the two treatment arms, the ETN+MTX treatment arm had ~5-15% higher rates of response compared with ETN monotherapy for the DAS28 and HAQ outcomes (regardless of Week 52 DAS28 subgroup), and for radiographic outcomes for Week 52 DAS28 responders. A ~25% higher rate of response for the ETN+MTX vs the ETN monotherapy treatment arm was seen for radiographic outcomes in the Week 52 DAS28 non-response categories (Table). Week 52 DAS28 status did not modify treatment effect on outcomes, but did increase the ETN treatment effect on radiological efficacy from ~10% for Week 52 DAS28 responders to ~25% for Week 52 DAS28 non-responder.

Conclusion: For patients with RA receiving ETN+MTX who achieved DAS28 LDA or remission after 52 weeks, discontinuation of MTX at Week 52 may result in minimal loss of clinical, functional, and radiological efficacy after an additional 52 weeks of treatment with ETN monotherapy.

1 Emery P, et al. Lancet 2008;372:375-82.


COMET Y2 ACR19 Table


COMET Y2 ACR19 Figure


Disclosure: P. Emery, AbbVie, 2, 5, 9, BMS, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 9, Gilead, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, 9, MSD, 2, 5, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 9, Pfizer, 2, 5, 9, Roche, 2, 5, 9, Samsung, 2, 5, 9, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., 2, Sandoz, 2, 5, 9, UCB, 2, 5, 9; F. Breedveld, None; R. Pedersen, Pfizer, 1, 3, 4; E. Campos, Pfizer, 3, 4; A. Szumski, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3, Syneos Health, 3; T. Hirose, Pfizer, 3, 4, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Emery P, Breedveld F, Pedersen R, Campos E, Szumski A, Hirose T. Relationships Between DAS28 Response and Clinical, Functional and Radiographic Outcomes in Year 2 of the COMET Study of Etanercept in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relationships-between-das28-response-and-clinical-functional-and-radiographic-outcomes-in-year-2-of-the-comet-study-of-etanercept-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relationships-between-das28-response-and-clinical-functional-and-radiographic-outcomes-in-year-2-of-the-comet-study-of-etanercept-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology