ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2013

Abstract Number: 462

Reduced Response To Biologic Treatments in  Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Affected By Arterial Hypertension

Marco Antivalle1, Michel Chevallard2, Michele Battellino2, Alberto Batticciotto3, Maria Chiara Ditto2, Alessandra Mutti1, Federica Rigamonti4, Valentina Varisco2, Sara Bongiovanni2, Fabiola Atzeni5 and Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini6, 1Rheumatology, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy, 2Rheumatology, Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy, 3Rheumatology, Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy, 4Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy, 5Rheumatology, Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, MiIano, Italy, 6Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2013

Keywords: Biologic agents, Co-morbidities and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Several reports show that the presence of comorbidities negatively influences both functional status (1) and quality of life (2) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).  No published study, however, has addressed the impact of comorbidities on the response to biologic treatments. Aim of the present study was to assess whether  the  presence of arterial hypertension influences the clinical response to biologics in RA.

Methods: The study population consisted of 526 patients affected by RA  (416 F 110 M, mean age 53.8±14.27 yrs) treated with first-line biologic treatments. 349 (66.3%) patients were normotensive (NT), and 177 (33.7%) hypertensive (AH). Disease activity was evaluated by DAS28. The 6-month response to biologic treatments was evaluated by EULAR response criteria, and by the percentage of patients in low disease activity (DAS28 <3.2) and in remission (DAS28<2.6). The differences in the percentage of responders between the 2 groups were analyzed by generalized linear models, correcting data for confounder variables (age, sex, baseline disease activity, disease duration), and for the presence of other comorbidities (diabetes, dyslipidemia, ischemic heart disease, osteoporosis, fibromyalgia, thyroid disease and COPD). In the following test, the observed percentages are reported, while statistical significance (p values) refers to corrected values. All statistical analyses were performed with the IBM SPSS 20.0 software.

Results: The vast majority of patients were treated with anti-TNF biologics in both groups (AH 94.5%, NT 90.6%, p=0.177). The percentage of females (AH 82% NT F 78%, p=0.586) was not significantly different in the 2 groups, while mean age was significantly higher in AH patients (59.85±12.53 vs 51.29±14.29 yrs,  p=0.000), and disease duration in NT patients (4.4±6.4 vs 2.5±5.1 yrs, p=0.001). Among the other comorbidities, only the prevalence of dyslipidemia, osteoporosis, and COPD was significantly higher in AH group (p<0.05). Biologic treatment was stopped or switched in 192/526 (36.5%) patients before the 6th month, without a significant difference between the 2 groups (AH: 75/177 (42.4%); NT 117/349 (33.5%), p=0.361). Baseline DAS28 was higher in AH patients (5.73±1.11 vs 5.18±1.34, p=0.000). EULAR response at 6 months (Fig. 1), and the percentage of patients in low disease activity (14/102 (13.7)% vs 71/232 (30.6%), p=0.000) and in remission (8/102 (7.8%) vs 48/232 (20.7%), p=0.001) (Fig. 2) were significantly lower in AH patients.

Conclusion: Concomitant arterial hypertension influences negatively the response to biologic treatments in rheumatoid arthritis. The presence of comorbidities should be taken into account in the evaluation of the clinical response to biologic treatments.

References:

1) van den Hoek J, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jan 17. [Epub ahead of print]

2) Radner H, et al. Rheumatology 2011;50:381–388.


Disclosure:

M. Antivalle,
None;

M. Chevallard,
None;

M. Battellino,
None;

A. Batticciotto,
None;

M. C. Ditto,
None;

A. Mutti,
None;

F. Rigamonti,
None;

V. Varisco,
None;

S. Bongiovanni,
None;

F. Atzeni,
None;

P. Sarzi-Puttini,
None.

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reduced-response-to-biologic-treatments-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-affected-by-arterial-hypertension/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology