ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 462

Reduced Response To Biologic Treatments in  Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Affected By Arterial Hypertension

Marco Antivalle1, Michel Chevallard2, Michele Battellino2, Alberto Batticciotto3, Maria Chiara Ditto2, Alessandra Mutti1, Federica Rigamonti4, Valentina Varisco2, Sara Bongiovanni2, Fabiola Atzeni5 and Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini6, 1Rheumatology, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy, 2Rheumatology, Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy, 3Rheumatology, Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy, 4Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy, 5Rheumatology, Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, MiIano, Italy, 6Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents, Co-morbidities and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Several reports show that the presence of comorbidities negatively influences both functional status (1) and quality of life (2) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).  No published study, however, has addressed the impact of comorbidities on the response to biologic treatments. Aim of the present study was to assess whether  the  presence of arterial hypertension influences the clinical response to biologics in RA.

Methods: The study population consisted of 526 patients affected by RA  (416 F 110 M, mean age 53.8±14.27 yrs) treated with first-line biologic treatments. 349 (66.3%) patients were normotensive (NT), and 177 (33.7%) hypertensive (AH). Disease activity was evaluated by DAS28. The 6-month response to biologic treatments was evaluated by EULAR response criteria, and by the percentage of patients in low disease activity (DAS28 <3.2) and in remission (DAS28<2.6). The differences in the percentage of responders between the 2 groups were analyzed by generalized linear models, correcting data for confounder variables (age, sex, baseline disease activity, disease duration), and for the presence of other comorbidities (diabetes, dyslipidemia, ischemic heart disease, osteoporosis, fibromyalgia, thyroid disease and COPD). In the following test, the observed percentages are reported, while statistical significance (p values) refers to corrected values. All statistical analyses were performed with the IBM SPSS 20.0 software.

Results: The vast majority of patients were treated with anti-TNF biologics in both groups (AH 94.5%, NT 90.6%, p=0.177). The percentage of females (AH 82% NT F 78%, p=0.586) was not significantly different in the 2 groups, while mean age was significantly higher in AH patients (59.85±12.53 vs 51.29±14.29 yrs,  p=0.000), and disease duration in NT patients (4.4±6.4 vs 2.5±5.1 yrs, p=0.001). Among the other comorbidities, only the prevalence of dyslipidemia, osteoporosis, and COPD was significantly higher in AH group (p<0.05). Biologic treatment was stopped or switched in 192/526 (36.5%) patients before the 6th month, without a significant difference between the 2 groups (AH: 75/177 (42.4%); NT 117/349 (33.5%), p=0.361). Baseline DAS28 was higher in AH patients (5.73±1.11 vs 5.18±1.34, p=0.000). EULAR response at 6 months (Fig. 1), and the percentage of patients in low disease activity (14/102 (13.7)% vs 71/232 (30.6%), p=0.000) and in remission (8/102 (7.8%) vs 48/232 (20.7%), p=0.001) (Fig. 2) were significantly lower in AH patients.

Conclusion: Concomitant arterial hypertension influences negatively the response to biologic treatments in rheumatoid arthritis. The presence of comorbidities should be taken into account in the evaluation of the clinical response to biologic treatments.

References:

1) van den Hoek J, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jan 17. [Epub ahead of print]

2) Radner H, et al. Rheumatology 2011;50:381–388.


Disclosure:

M. Antivalle,
None;

M. Chevallard,
None;

M. Battellino,
None;

A. Batticciotto,
None;

M. C. Ditto,
None;

A. Mutti,
None;

F. Rigamonti,
None;

V. Varisco,
None;

S. Bongiovanni,
None;

F. Atzeni,
None;

P. Sarzi-Puttini,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reduced-response-to-biologic-treatments-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-affected-by-arterial-hypertension/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology