ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 964

Redesign Of a Rheumatology Curriculum For Internal Medicine Residents: Results Of Needs Assessment Survey

Susan F. Kroop1, Cecilia P. Chung2 and Charlene M. Dewey3, 1Medicine/Rheumatology, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, TN, 2Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 3Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Curriculum, Education, medical and educational research

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Medical Education

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: We plan to improve internal medicine (IM) resident competence in caring for patients with rheumatologic disease and increase resident interest in rheumatology as a career. To achieve this goal, we conducted a needs assessment to help inform curriculum revisions to enhance our rheumatologic ambulatory curriculum.

Methods: After interviewing IM and Rheumatology faculty we constructed a 16-item online self-assessment resident survey tool. This tool assessed  confidence (0=not confident, 100=extremely confident) in performing a rheumatologic history, exam and common rheumatology procedures (knee injection and aspiration, and shoulder and trochanteric bursa injection), ordering and interpreting rheumatologic labs (ESR, CRP, RF, CCP, ANA), and caring for patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and fibromyalgia.  Additional questions included demographics, interest in rheumatology as a topic and career, and current career choice. Between February and May, 2013, we invited categorical PGY1 residents, just prior to the onset of their one week rheumatology ambulatory block, and all PGY3 residents to complete the Web-based survey. The results from the resident surveys were analyzed via two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test. IRB-approval and consent was obtained prior to completing the survey.

Results: Eighty-six percent (19/22) PGY1 IM residents and 70% (6/37) of PGY3 IM residents responded.  Twenty-three of 45 residents (51%) were females. Twelve (27%) residents planned careers in General IM vs. 33 (73%) in IM subspecialties. There was no significant difference in any self-assessed confidence ratings when analyzed by gender or career plans. Table 1 summarizes the results.  Overall PGY3 residents self-assessed their confidence ratings higher than PGY1s in all categories. There was no difference in interest in rheumatology between the PGY1 and PGY3  groups but there was significantly less interest in rheumatology as a career in the PGY3 group (p=0.002). Self-rated confidence in joint procedures was consistently lower for both groups compared to history, exam, lab interpretation and patient care.

Conclusion: Our results suggest we need to enhance training of procedural skills in our ambulatory curriculum. Further study on factors that influence a resident to consider rheumatology as a career is needed. Encouragement and support for rheumatology as a career should be given early and throughout training.

Table 1: Self rated confidence survey results of PGY1 and PGY3 IM residents Feb-May 2013; Visual analogue scale (0-100).

Self-rated confidence in performing:

PGY1 (median, IQR)

PGY3 (median, IQR)

 P value

95% Confidence Interval of difference in medians

Rheumatology History taking

50 (27-64)

65 (50-76)

0.014

-4,-27

Rheumatologic exam

30 (18-52)

59 (37-65)

0.005

-6,-32

Knee injection

10 (2-35)

34 (17-50)

0.006

-6,-33

Knee aspiration

12 (2-20)

42 (30-62)

<0.001

-17,-42

Shoulder injection

 5 (1-13)

19 (2-34)

0.041

0,-21

Trochanteric bursa injection

 5 (0-14)

20 (6-34)

0.019

-1,-22

Self-rated confidence in ordering and interpreting:

 

 

 

 

ESR

63 (50-69)

72 (61-81)

0.004

-5,-25

CRP

59 (48-68)

73 (64-84)

<0.001

-7,-25

ANA

50 (32-59)

62 (50-76)

0.011

-5,-30

RF

55 (39-64)

65 (56-71)

0.032

-1,-21

CCP

57 (38-84)

70 (61-88)

0.161

5,-29

Self-rated confidence in care of patient with :

 

 

 

 

OA Care

53 (44-75)

68 (64-75)

0.023

-2,-22

RA Care

43 (28-52)

59 (35-66)

0.011

-3,-26

Gout Care

64 (49-80)

82 (73-85)

0.001

-5,-26

SLE Care

31 (22-51)

50 (38-67)

0.006

-7,-27

Fibromyalgia Care

31 (19-42)

56 (38-74)

<0.001

-12,-38

Self-rated interest in:

 

 

 

 

Topic of Rheumatology

62 (56-73)

60 (36-72)

0.260

-4, 21

Career in Rheumatology

49 (29-58)

17 (0-38)

0.002

11,35

 


Disclosure:

S. F. Kroop,
None;

C. P. Chung,
None;

C. M. Dewey,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/redesign-of-a-rheumatology-curriculum-for-internal-medicine-residents-results-of-needs-assessment-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology