ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1456

Real-World Treat-to-Target Strategy in Psoriatic Arthritis: Baseline Characteristics from the MONITOR-PsA Cohort

Lija James1, Elnaz Saeedi2, Jean-Guillaume Letarouilly1, Nicola Gullick3, Anne Francis2, Deepak Jadon4, William Tillett5, Yvonne Sinomati2, Laura Tucker1, Nadia Mian2, Ines Rombach2, Ioana Marian2, Maria Sofia Massa2 and Laura Coates6, 1Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, Coventry, United Kingdom, 4Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 5Royal National Hospital of Rheumatic Diseases; Department of Life Sciences, Centre for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom, 6University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Erosions, Managed Care, Psoriatic arthritis, radiography

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: SpA Including PsA – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic musculoskeletal disease, which can lead to progressive joint pain, joint destruction, and loss of function. Evidence suggests that delayed diagnosis of even six to twelve months is associated with radiographic joint damage and poor functional outcomes in PsA.

To examine demographic and clinical characteristics associated with diagnostic delay in an inception PsA cohort.

Methods: The Multicentre Observational Initiative in Treat to target Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis (MONITOR-PsA) study (NCT03531073) is a prospective, population-based cohort of adult PsA patients from 13 secondary care rheumatology centres across UK, between 2018–2024. All participants met CASPAR criteria and were treated routinely according to treat-to- target strategy (Fig 1).

The study collected clinical and patient-reported outcomes that align with the 2016 OMERACT core and strongly recommended domains for PsA. In addition, radiographic damage was determined based on joint erosion score, destruction and proliferation from hand/wrist and feet radiographs, and joint space narrowing (JSN) as included in the Sharp-van der Heijde modified (SvdH) score for PsA.

Results: Baseline data were available for 300 participants. 46.3% were female, and 63% had polyarticular arthritis (Table 1). The mean (SD) age was 46.2 (14.4) years, and the mean disease duration was 34 (67.4) months, with a median (IQR) of 10.9 (4.2, 28.7) months at diagnosis. The polyarthritis group (joint count >3, n=197) had a mean disease duration of 34.4 (75.7) months and the oligoarthritis group (n=103) mean duration of 33.3 (47.9) months.

The mean (SD) PASDAS score of 5.1 (1.2) indicated moderate disease activity (defined PASDAS score greater than 3.2 and less than 5.4) and mean (SD) PASI score of 3.8 (5.3). At the initial presentation, 48.3% had enthesitis, 24.3% had dactylitis and 63.7% reported inflammatory back pain lasting for more than 3 months with a mean (SD) BASDAI score of 5.6 (2.4). Additionally, there were observed cardio-metabolic comorbidities including: overweight (41.3%), elevated liver enzymes (32%), hypertension (16%), diabetes mellitus (7%), and dyslipidaemia (7%).

At the time of presentation, 25% of the participants had erosive disease, with 19.7% experiencing erosive disease in the hand joints and 10% in the feet joints. Among those with erosive disease, the mean (SD) Total SvdH score was 7.7 (11.2), with a mean (SD) erosion score of 1.4 (3.4) and a mean JSN score of 7.8 (9.3).

The mean (SD) HAQ disability score was 0.9 (0.7), indicating moderate to severe disability (moderate score 0.8 ≤ to < 1.2). The mean (SD) PsAID-12 score at baseline was 5.0 (2.3), with a PsAID score ≥4 indicating a high impact of PsA.

Conclusion: In this real-world inception cohort, it was observed that patients with PsA still experience significant delays in receiving a diagnosis. One-quarter of patients had radiographic damage at diagnosis, identical to the proportion in the 2003 Kane et al. Irish study. At the time of diagnosis, most patients experience a high disease burden, including radiographic damage, high disability scores, and a negative impact on their quality of life.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Pragmatic routine Treat-to-Target strategy.
DMARD: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug, MTX: methotrexate, PsA: Psoriatic Arthritis

Supporting image 2

Table 1: Baseline demographic and characteristics
All the variables are presented as mean (SD), median (IQR). Sex, working for pay, and current psoriasis are presented as n (%).
SD: standard deviation, IQR: interquartile range


Disclosures: L. James: None; E. Saeedi: None; J. Letarouilly: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Amgen, 6, Biogen, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 6, Galapagos, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6; N. Gullick: AbbVie, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Janssen, 5, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; A. Francis: None; D. Jadon: None; W. Tillett: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Ono Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; Y. Sinomati: None; L. Tucker: None; N. Mian: None; I. Rombach: None; I. Marian: None; M. Massa: None; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

James L, Saeedi E, Letarouilly J, Gullick N, Francis A, Jadon D, Tillett W, Sinomati Y, Tucker L, Mian N, Rombach I, Marian I, Massa M, Coates L. Real-World Treat-to-Target Strategy in Psoriatic Arthritis: Baseline Characteristics from the MONITOR-PsA Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-treat-to-target-strategy-in-psoriatic-arthritis-baseline-characteristics-from-the-monitor-psa-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-treat-to-target-strategy-in-psoriatic-arthritis-baseline-characteristics-from-the-monitor-psa-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology