ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0369

Real-World Persistence of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Biologic-Experienced Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Jeffrey Curtis1, Emily Holladay2, Nick McCormick3, Yujie Su4, Fenglong Xie1 and Alexis Dineen5, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Edmond, OK, 3Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 4University of Alabama at Birimingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Self, Portola Valley, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0357–0386) Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Over the last decade, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKs) for RA have been increasingly used as a treatment option for patients who do not respond to biologic DMARD (bDMARD) treatments. The introduction of orally administered drugs, like JAKs, was expected to address poor therapy persistence rates associated with self-administered, injectable bDMARDs. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the persistence of JAKs used to treat RA in the United States using real-world commercial (Marketscan) and government (Medicare) insurance claims data.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients initiating their first JAK for RA using 2006-2021 Marketscan data (commercial health plan claims data) and 2010-2020 Medicare fee for service (FFS) data to assess 2-year JAK persistence. The last index date in the claims data that was allowable was 12/31/2019 for Medicare and 12/31/2020 forMarketscan, enabling the analysis to have the potential for at least 1 year of follow-up . Drug persistence was measured at 1 and 2 years using the following definition: continuous use of JAK without gap of >90 days (next prescription fill date is no later than previous prescription fill date + days of supply + 90) and did not switch to another JAK or bDMARD.

Results: In the Medicare cohort, there were 11,170 RA patients with an index date on or before 12/31/2019. Individuals had mean prior use of 2.1 ± 1.2 bDMARDs and 1.8 ± 1.0 cDMARDs. JAK persistence was 42.0% (95% CI: 41.1, 43.0) at 1 year and 27.2% (95% CI: 26.4, 28.1) at 2 years. Drug persistence differed across individual drugs with 1-year persistence of 27.4% (95% CI: 21.1, 35.6), 42.2% (95% CI: 41.3, 43.2), and 41.1% (95% CI: 33.4, 50.5) for baricitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib, respectively. At 2 years, 10.6% (95% CI: 5.8, 19.5) and 27.4% (95% CI: 26.6, 28.3) continued baricitinib and tofacitinib, respectively. There were no patients taking upadacitinib at 2 years, which was not unexpected given the end of the Medicare data (12/31/2020) and the timing of FDA approval of upadacitinib (2019). In the Marketscan cohort, there were 9,458 patients with an index date on or before 12/31/2020. Patients had mean prior use of 2.0 ± 1.1 bDMARDs and 1.7 ± 1.0 cDMARDs. Among these, 43.7% (95% CI: 42.6, 44.7) initiating a JAK were persistent at 1 year, and 26.9% (95% CI: 25.9, 28.0) were persistent at 2 years. At 1 year, 41.9% (95% CI: 33.4, 52.6), 43.1% (95% CI: 42.0, 44.2), and 50.8% (95% CI: 47.0, 54.9) of patients continued baricitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib, respectively. At 2 years, 22.1% (95% CI: 14.8, 32.9) of patients continued baricitinib, 26.8% (95% CI: 25.7, 27.9) continued tofacitinib, and 20.1% (95% CI: 13.8, 29.2) continued upadacitinib.

Conclusion: Persistence with initial JAK for RA in real-world settings was poor for all FDA-approved JAKs as measured in two independent data sources, and 2-year estimates were comparable between commercial and government health claims sources. Drug persistence differed across individual JAKs, with lower persistence rates for baricitinib compared to tofacitinib and upadacitinib. Compared to historical data, the introduction of oral JAKs does not appear to have improved therapy persistence, with < 30% treatment persistence at 2 years.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: J. Curtis: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bendcare, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Corrona, 2, 5, Crescendo, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, FASTER, 2, 4, Genentech, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Moderna, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; E. Holladay: None; N. McCormick: None; Y. Su: None; F. Xie: None; A. Dineen: SetPoint Medical, 3, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Curtis J, Holladay E, McCormick N, Su Y, Xie F, Dineen A. Real-World Persistence of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Biologic-Experienced Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-persistence-of-janus-kinase-inhibitors-in-biologic-experienced-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-persistence-of-janus-kinase-inhibitors-in-biologic-experienced-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology