ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 204

Real-World Evidence: Clinical and Economic Burden of Anemia, Venous Thromboembolism, and Malignancy Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Switching from First Biologic DMARD to Another Treatment in the US

Robin Dore1, Jenya Antonova 2, Magdaliz Gorritz 3, Lawrence Chang 2, Jing He 3 and Mark Genovese 4, 1Private practice, Tustin, CA, 2Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, 3IQVIA, Plymouth meeting, PA, 4Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Anemia, malignancy and health care cost, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Thrombosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Epidemiology & Public Health Poster I: RA

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: RA patients have an increased risk of malignancy1 and deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE)2 and high prevalence of anemia.3 The risks of anemia and malignancy vary by prior DMARD exposure.1 Comorbidities and treatment side effects may lead to treatment discontinuation and increase healthcare costs. Existing estimates of anemia, DVT, PE, and malignancy are outdated or not specific to patients initiating next treatment after first biologic (b)DMARD. This study aimed to estimate prevalence, incidence, and associated costs of these conditions in RA patients switching from a first bDMARD to another treatment.

Methods: In a US health-plan claims database, we selected adult RA patients (≥2 RA diagnoses ≥30 days apart) who initiated their first bDMARD (1/1/2012–3/31/2017) and switched to another bDMARD or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi; index date, ID). Patients had continuous health plan enrollment for 12 months pre-ID and ≥12 months post-ID. The prevalence and incidence of anemia, DVT, PE, DVT or PE, and malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) were assessed by index therapy. Incidence counted patients with new events per 100 patient-years (P100PY) while on treatment. We compared mean per-patient-per-year (PPPY) costs (total, medical, and pharmacy) in patients with and without these conditions.

Results: In 4656 patients who switched from first bDMARD (median age 54 years, 78% female), median RA duration was 1.5 years. Upon discontinuation of the first bDMARD, 46% of patients received a monotherapy (61% TNF-α inhibitor (TNFi), 24% non-TNFi, 15% JAKi), and 54% received a conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD-combination therapy (69% TNFi + csDMARD, 23% non-TNFi + csDMARD, 8% JAKi + csDMARD). The 12-month pre-ID prevalence ranged 14.6–19.8% for anemia, 1.0–2.5% for DVT, 0.7–2.2% for PE, 1.8–3.7% for DVT or PE, and 3.5–8.8% for malignancy (Table 1). Overall, P100PY incidence rates were 6.9 for anemia, 0.7 for DVT, 0.3 for PE, 0.9 for DVT or PE, and 2.0 for malignancy. Incidence rates varied among different treatment classes (Table 2). Total PPPY unadjusted healthcare costs were higher in RA patients with vs without condition: anemia $66,896 vs $53,853; DVT $78,461 vs $54,462; PE $99,321 vs $54,483; DVT/PE $88,610 vs $54,305; malignancy $76,741 vs $54,172, all p< 0.001. Cost differences were primarily associated with medical costs (Table 3).

Conclusion: Anemia, DVT, PE, and malignancies affected patients who switched from first bDMARD to another treatment; new cases occurred and varied by treatment received. These conditions were associated with increased unadjusted healthcare costs, primarily driven by medical costs. Future studies are needed to adjust costs by accounting for differences in patient cohorts. The prevalence of these conditions (and the risk of their development as treatment side effects) should be factored into the selection of most optimal treatment. 

References

  1. Wilton KM, et al. Rheumatol Ther 2017;4:333-47.
  2. Ungprasert P, et al. Clin Rheumatol 2014;33:297-304.
  3. Wilson A, et al. Am J Med 2004;116 Suppl 7A:50S-7S.


Anemia_Table 1


Anemia_Table 2


Anemia_Table 3


Disclosure: R. Dore, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, Inc., 5, 8, 9, Abbvie, Inc., 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, 9, Biogen, 2, 9, Gilead Science, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, 9, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 9, Pfizer, 2, 8, 9, Radius, 8, Regeneron, 8, Sanofi, 8, UCB, 2, 8, 9, VCB, 8; J. Antonova, Gilead Science, 1, 3, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 1, 3; M. Gorritz, IQVIA, 9; L. Chang, Gilead Science, 9, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 1, 3, Lilly, 9; J. He, IQVIA, 9; M. Genovese, AbbVie, 2, 5, Abbvie, 2, 5, AbbVie, Inc., 9, Astellas, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, EMD Merck Serono, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Galapagos NV, 2, 5, 9, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Gilead Science, 9, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, 9, GSK, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 9, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Pfizer, Inc., 9, Pzier, 9, RPharm, 5, Sanofi Genzyme, 2, 5, Vertex, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dore R, Antonova J, Gorritz M, Chang L, He J, Genovese M. Real-World Evidence: Clinical and Economic Burden of Anemia, Venous Thromboembolism, and Malignancy Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Switching from First Biologic DMARD to Another Treatment in the US [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-evidence-clinical-and-economic-burden-of-anemia-venous-thromboembolism-and-malignancy-among-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-switching-from-first-biologic-dmard-to-another-treatment-in-the/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-evidence-clinical-and-economic-burden-of-anemia-venous-thromboembolism-and-malignancy-among-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-switching-from-first-biologic-dmard-to-another-treatment-in-the/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology