ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2454

Real-World Consistency of Response to Adalimumab over Time in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from the Corrona Registry

Dimitrios A. Pappas1,2, George W. Reed2,3, Chitra Karki4, Jenny Griffith5, Martha Skup5, Vishvas Garg5 and Joel Kremer2,6, 1Columbia University, New York, NY, 2Corrona LLC, Southborough, MA, 3UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA, 4Corrona, LLC, Southborough, MA, 5AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 6Albany Medical College and The Center for Rheumatology, Albany, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Biologic drugs, clinical practice and inflammation, Clinical Response

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster III: Efficacy and Safety of Originator Biologics and Biosimilars

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Adalimumab (ADA) was approved in the US in 2002 for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and subsequently approved for the management of other inflammatory diseases such as Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Expanded use of ADA has resulted in changes to manufacturing processes and production scale, making it important to examine the clinical response to ADA over time. This study aimed to assess the response rate to ADA in patients with RA over the years since its US approval.

Methods: Biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe RA (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI]>10) who initiated ADA during follow-up in the Corrona registry (2003–16) and had a 6-month registry visit (3–9 month window) were included in the study. Six groups were defined based on year of ADA initiation: 2003−05, 2006–07, 2008−09, 2010–11, 2012−13, and 2014−16. Patient characteristics at time of initiation were summarized by group year. Outcomes included percentage of patients with low disease activity (LDA)/remission (CDAI≤10) and modified American College of Rheumatology (mACR)20/50/70 (which do not include acute phase reactants) at 6-month follow-up. Non-response was imputed for patients switching to another biologic prior to 6 months. Chi-square tests were done to examine differences in response rates by group. Response rates were also compared among groups adjusting for covariates that differed at time of initiation using logistic regression models.

Results: Of 23,169 biologic-naïve patients, 1949 initiated ADA, 1056 had baseline CDAI>10, and 820 who had a 6‑month follow-up visit were included. In earlier year groups, patients were younger at time of disease onset (44.5 years in 2003−05, 47.1 years in 2006−07, 46.5 years in 2008−09, 51.6 years in 2010−11, 48.3 years in 2012−13 and 51.1 years in 2014−16; P=.0001), but had longer disease duration (10.8 years in 2003−05, 8.0 years in 2006−07, 5.9 years in 2008−09, 3.7 years in 2010−11, 4.8 years in 2012−13 and 4.6 years in 2014−16; P<.0001) compared with later year groups. At least 2/3 of patients remained on ADA at 6-month follow-up (range: 66% in 2014−16 to 77% in 2003−05). In each group, 43%−52% of patients achieved LDA/remission (Table). No significant differences in mACR20/50/70 rates were seen across groups.

Conclusion: No differences in clinical response rates (CDAI and modified ACR20/50/70) to ADA were noted over time among patients with RA in a real-world setting. The findings of this study indicate a consistent clinical response to ADA in RA patients since the market launch of the drug.

 

Table. Outcomes at 6-Month Follow-up

 

2003−05

N=92

2006−07

N=112

2008−09

N=103

2010−11

N=158

2012−13

N=272

2014−16

N=83

P-Value

LDA/remission

   n (%)

   95% CI

43 (46.7)

(36.3, 57.4)

48 (42.9)

(33.6, 52.6)

54 (52.4)

(42.4, 62.4)

76 (48.1)

(40.1, 56.2)

136 (50.0)

(43.9, 56.1)

40 (48.2)

(37.1, 59.4)

 

OR (95% CI)a

ref

0.9 (0.5, 1.6)

1.2 (0.7, 2.2)

1.1 (0.6, 1.8)

1.1 (0.7, 1.8)

1.0 (0.5, 1.9)

0.91

mACR20

   n (%)

   95% CI

32 (34.8)

(25.2, 45.4)

41 (36.6)

(27.7, 46.2)

41 (39.8)

(30.3, 49.9)

54 (34.2)

(26.8, 42.1)

103 (37.9)

(32.1, 43.9)

28 (33.7)

(23.7, 45.0)

 

OR (95% CI)a

ref

1.0 (0.6, 1.8)

1.2 (0.7, 2.2)

0.9 (0.5, 1.6)

1.1 (0.7, 1.8)

0.9 (0.5, 1.8)

0.93

mACR50

   n (%)

   95% CI

23 (25.0)

(16.6, 35.1)

29 (25.9)

(18.1, 35.0)

25 (24.3)

(16.4, 33.7)

27 (17.1)

(11.6, 23.9)

61 (22.4)

(17.6, 27.9)

15 (18.1)

(10.5, 28.1)

 

OR (95% CI)a

ref

1.0 (0.5, 1.9)

0.9 (0.5, 1.8)

0.6 (0.3, 1.2)

0.8 (0.5, 1.5)

0.7 (0.3, 1.4)

0.51

mACR70

   n (%)

   95% CI

12 (13.0)

(6.9, 21.7)

11 (9.8)

(5.0, 16.9)

18 (17.5)

(10.7, 26.2)

12 (7.6)

(4.0, 12.9)

27 (9.9)

(6.6, 14.1)

5 (6.0)

(2.0, 13.5)

 

OR (95% CI)a

ref

0.7 (0.3, 1.7)

1.4 (0.6, 3.1)

0.5 (0.2, 1.3)

0.7 (0.3, 1.5)

0.4 (0.1, 1.3)

0.13

aAdjusted for baseline Clinical Disease Activity Index, duration of rheumatoid arthritis, initiation of mono versus combination therapy, prednisone use at initiation, age and sex.

CI, confidence interval; LDA, low disease activity; mACR, modified American College of Rheumatology; OR, odds ratio; ref, reference.

 

 


Disclosure: D. A. Pappas, Corrona, 3,Corrona, 1,Novartis, 9; G. W. Reed, Corrona, 3,Corrona, 1,UMASS appointment, 6; C. Karki, Corrona, LLC, 3; J. Griffith, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; M. Skup, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; V. Garg, Abbvie, 1,Abbvie, 3; J. Kremer, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Genentech, Lilly, Regeneron, Sanofi, Pfizer, 5,AbbVie, Genentech, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer, 2,Corrona, 3,Corrona, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pappas DA, Reed GW, Karki C, Griffith J, Skup M, Garg V, Kremer J. Real-World Consistency of Response to Adalimumab over Time in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from the Corrona Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-consistency-of-response-to-adalimumab-over-time-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-from-the-corrona-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-consistency-of-response-to-adalimumab-over-time-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-from-the-corrona-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology