ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2674

Real-World Analysis of Initial Clinical Response and Future Outcomes Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating and Remaining on a 1st-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor in the United States

christina Charles-Schoeman1, Patrick Zueger2, Erin Blondell2, Siran Fang2, Yi Peng2, Manish Jain3 and John Tesser4, 1UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, CA, 2AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, 3Endeavor Health Swedish Hospital and Captain James A, Chicago, IL, 4Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associates, P.C., Phoenix, AZ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Administrative Data, Disease Activity, Response Criteria, rheumatoid arthritis, TNF-blocking Antibody

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Title: Abstracts: RA – Treatment II: Refining Use of Established Therapies

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), current ACR guidelines recommend evaluating treatment response within 3 months of initiating a new therapy. In patients who do not achieve an early treatment response, the likelihood of a future treatment response while on the same therapy is not well understood. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the subsequent treatment response among patients with RA who initiated and remained on a 1st-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) after achieving or not achieving an initial treatment response.

Methods: This analysis used linked administrative health care claims and electronic medical record data from the OM1® Real-World Data Cloud. Adults with RA initiating a 1st-line TNFi between January 1, 2016, and March 31, 2023, who were in moderate/high disease activity (MDA/HDA) at TNFi initiation (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] >10) and remained on 1st-line TNFi for ≥12 months were included. Follow-up CDAI was assessed from months 3 (±30 days) to 12 (±45 days) after TNFi initiation. Treatment response in the primary analysis was defined as achievement of CDAI low disease activity (LDA) or remission (CDAI ≤10). In the secondary analysis, treatment response was defined as achievement of CDAI minimal clinically important difference (MCID; defined as ≥6-point improvement from baseline CDAI in MDA and ≥12-point improvement from baseline CDAI in HDA). Proportions of patients with a treatment response at 3 months were reported. Following the 3-month visit, the subsequent treatment response at 12 months and at all visits with an available CDAI from months 3 to 12 were evaluated.

Results: Data from 1215 patients were analyzed, the mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 59.2±13.3 years and 77.1% were female. In the primary analysis, 65.9% (n=801) of patients remained in MDA/HDA while 34.1% (n=414) were in LDA or remission at 3 months after 1st-line TNFi initiation (Figure 1). Among patients in MDA/HDA at 3 months, 73.5% were in MDA/HDA at 12 months and 64.2% were in MDA/HDA at all follow-up visits from months 3 to 12 (mean number of follow-up visits with CDAI=2.7). Among patients in LDA/remission at 3 months, 73.0% were in LDA/remission at 12 months, but only 55.3% were in LDA/remission at all follow-up visits from months 3 to 12 (mean number of follow-up visits with CDAI=2.5). In the secondary analysis, 43.7% (n=531) achieved a CDAI MCID response at 3 months while 56.3% (n=684) did not (Figure 2). Of patients not responding at 3 months, 68.9% did not achieve CDAI MCID at 12 months and 54.8% did not achieve CDAI MCID at any visit from months 3 to 12. Among 3-month responders, 77.8% achieved MCID at 12 months and 62.7% achieved MCID at all visits from months 3 to 12.

Conclusion: Among patients with RA initiating a 1st-line TNFi, the majority of those who did not achieve a treatment response at 3 months also did not achieve a subsequent response from months 3 through 12. Further, approximately 1 in 4 patients achieving LDA/remission at 3 months were no longer in LDA/remission at month 12. These findings may be useful to inform clinical decision-making on treatment continuation after initial nonresponse in patients with RA initiating 1st-line TNFi therapy.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: c. Charles-Schoeman: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, Alexion, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, CSL Behring, 5, Galapagos, 2, Janssen, 5, Octapharma, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Priovant, 5, Recludix, 2; P. Zueger: AbbVie, 3, 11; E. Blondell: AbbVie, 3, 11; S. Fang: AbbVie, 3, 11; Y. Peng: AbbVie, 3, 11; M. Jain: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Anaptys Bio, 2, 5, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Horizon, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Kolon TissueGene, 2, 5, 6, LG-Chem, 2, 5, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, 6, Moderna, 2, 5, 6, NIH, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Olatec, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Selecta, 2, 5, 6, Shionogi, 2, 5, 6; J. Tesser: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 2, 5, 6, Alpine, 5, Amgen, 1, 2, 5, 6, Anthrosi Therapeutics, 5, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, 6, Aurinia, 1, 2, 5, 6, Bendcare, 5, 6, Biogen, 5, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 5, Corevitas, 5, CSL Behring, 5, DRL, 5, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, Emerald, 5, Exagen, 5, Genentech, 5, 6, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 2, 5, 6, Global Health Living Foundation, 5, Horizon, 5, Janssen, 1, 2, 5, 6, Kolon TissueGene, 5, Merck/MSD, 5, Mitsubishi, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, Organogenesis, 5, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 5, Samumed/Biosplice, 1, 2, 5, Sanofi/Genzyme, 1, 2, 5, 6, Selecta, 5, Setpoint, 2, 5, Sun Pharma, 5, Takeda, 5, UCB, 1, 2, 5, Vindico, 6, Vorso, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Charles-Schoeman c, Zueger P, Blondell E, Fang S, Peng Y, Jain M, Tesser J. Real-World Analysis of Initial Clinical Response and Future Outcomes Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating and Remaining on a 1st-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor in the United States [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-analysis-of-initial-clinical-response-and-future-outcomes-among-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-initiating-and-remaining-on-a-1st-line-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-in-the-united-state/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-analysis-of-initial-clinical-response-and-future-outcomes-among-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-initiating-and-remaining-on-a-1st-line-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-in-the-united-state/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology