ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0651

Readmission Risk and Quality of Care in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Gout Flares

Luigi Brunetti1, Janaki Vekaria1, Peter Lipsky2 and Naomi Schlesinger3, 1Rutgers Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, piscataway, NJ, 2AMPEL BioSolutions LLC., Charlottesville, VA, 3Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis and its economic burden is substantial, with estimates for the overall cost exceeding $20 billion (US) annually. Contributing to the economic burden are hospital admissions and iatrogenic events associated with pharmacotherapy.  Identification of modifiable risk factors would be an important contribution to clinical practice.

The purpose of this study was to identify opportunities for enhancing gout care in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with gout flares.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from electronic medical records (EMR) at a large community hospital. All consecutive patients visiting the medical center ED with a primary diagnosis of gout from 1/1/2016 to 7/1/2019 were included.  Patients were then followed for 90 days to determine whether they were readmitted to the ED for any reason.  A chart review identified whether they were on appropriate medications in terms of gout flare management. All data were summarized using descriptive statistics.  A multiple logistic regression was constructed to identify risk factors for ED utilization within 90 days of the index visit.

Results: A total of 214 patients were included in the analysis.  Most patients were male (79%), mean age was 59.4 ± 15.6 years, and mean Charlson comorbidity index was 0.5 ± 1.14.  The most common medications prescribed during the ED visit included NSAIDs (41.6%), opioids (28%), corticosteroids (26.6%), and colchicine (21%).  Allopurinol and febuxostat were initiated in the ED in 4.7% and 0.9%, respectively.  Discharge medications for the management of gout included NSAIDs (37%), corticosteroids (34.6%), opioids (23.8%), colchicine (14%), febuxostat (7%), and allopurinol (6.5%).  Of the patients sent home with an opioid, 40% were newly prescribed.  An anti-inflammatory medication was not prescribed in 29.6% of patients discharged from the ED. Readmission within 90 days was recorded in 16.8% of patients. Of these readmissions, 33.3% were gout-related and 11.1% were cardiac related. 

After adjusting for age and comorbidity index, patients receiving colchicine were 2.8 times more likely (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.12 to 7.02; p=0.027) to return to the ED within 90 days.  The most common cause of readmission in this subset was gout-related (54.5%).

Conclusion: Approximately  30% of patients were discharged from the ED without an anti-inflammatory medication, whereas initiation of urate lowering therapy was rare. Opiates were used frequently, but the indication was uncertain. Only 5.6% of subjects revisited the ED for gout-related diagnoses in the subsequent 3 months. Colchicine prescription was associated with an increased risk of gout-related ED utilization within 90 days. Treatment of gout in the ED is sub-optimal and often does not follow established guidelines.


Disclosure: L. Brunetti, CSL Behring, 2, Astellas Pharma, 2, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, 5; J. Vekaria, None; P. Lipsky, Horizon Therapeutics, 3; N. Schlesinger, Johnson and Johnson, 5, Horizon, 5, IFM, 5, Pfizer, 2, AMGEN, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Brunetti L, Vekaria J, Lipsky P, Schlesinger N. Readmission Risk and Quality of Care in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Gout Flares [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/readmission-risk-and-quality-of-care-in-patients-presenting-to-the-emergency-department-with-gout-flares/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/readmission-risk-and-quality-of-care-in-patients-presenting-to-the-emergency-department-with-gout-flares/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology