ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0113

Reactogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Associates with Immunogenicity in Patients with Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disease

Monica Yang1, Kimberly E. Taylor1, Diana Paez1, Alex Carividi1, Emanuel Demissie1, Niti Pawar1, Alia A. El-Qunni,2, Lily E. McMorrow2, Rebecca E. Schriefer2, Katherine Huang2, Baylee Kinnett2, Wooseob Kim2, Ali H Ellebedy2, Matthew Ciorba2, Michael Paley3, Parakkal Deepak2, Alfred Kim2, Patricia Katz1, Mehrdad Matloubian1, Mary Nakamura4 and Lianne Gensler5, 1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 3Washington University in St. Louis, Olivette, MO, 4UCSF/SFVAHCS, San Francisco, CA, 5Department of Rheumatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: COVID-19, immunology, Reactogenicity, Vaccination

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: Epidemiology & Public Health Poster I: COVID-19 & Vaccination (0084–0117)

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Little is known about the reactogenicity and related SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in patients with chronic inflammatory disease (CID). While researchers have hypothesized increased symptomatology following vaccine would indicate a more robust vaccine response, this has not been demonstrated in the general population. Our objective was to characterize the adverse event (AE) profile in patients with CID receiving the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and to better understand the relationship between reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with CID.

Methods: This study was part of a larger prospective study examining the immunogenicity and safety profile of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with CID. Adults with CID and healthy controls eligible to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were enrolled. Subjects participated in 3 study visits (pre-vaccine, after dose 1, after dose 2) where blood and clinical data were collected. Assessment of AEs including local and systemic symptoms were solicited within 7 days of receiving each vaccine dose. Serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) IgG+ antibody titerswere quantified to assess the magnitude of the humoral response following vaccination. Statistical analysis of solicited symptoms was performed utilizing two sample t-test and z-test. To study reactogenicity impact on vaccine antibody response, tobit regressions adjusting for patient status, age, gender, and vaccine type were utilized to account for left-censoring below the response detect limit.

Results: 178 participants were included in this study including 134 patients with CID and 44 healthy controls. Demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Solicited symptoms among controls and CID patients are shown in Figure 1. CID patients experienced significantly more symptoms after the 1st dose of vaccine compared to controls (p=0.04), including more headache, myalgia and fatigue (p< 0.05). For immunogenicity, after adjustment for covariates, a higher number of reported symptoms after the second dose was associated with higher antibody titers (p=0.028). Each increase of one endorsed symptom was associated with 15.9% increase in antibody titer. Among all individual symptoms (Table 2), the most strongly associated at each dose included site pain after 1st dose (p=0.04) with 118% increase in antibody titer when present and fatigue after 2nd dose (p=0.02) with 91.6% change in antibody titer when present.

Conclusion: This study is one of the first to examine reactogenicity of the novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccines among patients with CID and the relationship between reactogenicity and vaccine response. We demonstrated that patients with CID have a distinct reactogenicity profile from their healthy control counterparts with CID patients having more numerous symptoms following 1st dose of vaccine. Furthermore, we demonstrated an association between reactogenicity and immunogenicity in CID patients. This finding, thus far not seen in the general population, may speak to the more variable immunogenicity in patients with CID and could be an important indicator of vaccine response to the novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Table 1: Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Participants

Figure 1: Solicited Symptoms among Control vs. CID Patients

Table 2: Symptom measures associated with increased SARs-CoV_2 antibody titers


Disclosures: M. Yang, None; K. E. Taylor, None; D. Paez, None; A. Carividi, None; E. Demissie, None; N. Pawar, None; A. El-Qunni,, None; L. McMorrow, None; R. Schriefer, None; K. Huang, None; B. Kinnett, None; W. Kim, None; A. Ellebedy, Emergent BioSolutions, 5, Abbvie, 5; M. Ciorba, Abbvie, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, BMS, 2, Theravance, 2, Incyte, 5, Janssen, 5; M. Paley, None; P. Deepak, Abbvie, 1, Takeda Pharmaceuticals LLC, 5, Janssen Pharrmaceuticals, 1, Pfizer, 1, Prometheus Biosciences, 1, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 5, Arena Pharmaceuticals, 1, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, 5; A. Kim, Kypha, Inc., 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 6, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, 2, Annexon Biosciences, 2, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, 2, 6; P. Katz, None; M. Matloubian, Virtuoso Therapeutics Inc., 2; M. Nakamura, None; L. Gensler, Novartis, 5, UCB, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, Pfizer, 2, Pfizer, 5, Janssen, 2, UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yang M, E. Taylor K, Paez D, Carividi A, Demissie E, Pawar N, El-Qunni, A, McMorrow L, Schriefer R, Huang K, Kinnett B, Kim W, Ellebedy A, Ciorba M, Paley M, Deepak P, Kim A, Katz P, Matloubian M, Nakamura M, Gensler L. Reactogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Associates with Immunogenicity in Patients with Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reactogenicity-of-the-sars-cov-2-vaccines-associates-with-immunogenicity-in-patients-with-autoimmune-and-inflammatory-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reactogenicity-of-the-sars-cov-2-vaccines-associates-with-immunogenicity-in-patients-with-autoimmune-and-inflammatory-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology