ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2941

Reach and Effectiveness of a Health Communications Campaign Promoting Self Management Education: Results of a Pilot Test of the Learn More. Feel Better. Campaign

Teresa Brady1, Meghan Lewis2, Carla Cartwright2, Anne Hvizdak3 and Sara Lasker4, 1Clarity Consulting and Communications, Atlanta, GA, 2Porter Novelli, Atlanta, GA, 3Bureau of Aging and Disability Resources, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison, WI, 4Healthy & Hygge, Madison, WI

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Communication, Evaluation, self-management and website

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Title: 6W016 ARHP Abstract: Interventions & Self-Management–ARHP III (2940–2945)

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Learn More. Feel Better. (LMFB) is a multi-modal marketing campaign to promote self-management education (SME) as a chronic disease management strategy. The campaign targets adults ages 45-75 with chronic conditions including arthritis. Campaign strategies include paid and earned media, and local partner activity; all promote the same call-to-action to visit www.cdc.gov/LearnMoreFeelBetter to learn more about SME.

CDC pilot-tested the LMFB campaign in January-August, 2017, in one designated market area (DMA) (a midwestern five county area including a midsize urban area). Implementation included paid ads (print, radio, billboard, digital, and physician waiting/exam rooms), earned media (news stories/blog posts resulting from media outreach), and local partner promotion (in-person events, web and social media). Two campaign tactics (digital advertising via Google ads, and physician waiting/exam rooms ads) ran continuously. The remaining strategies and tactics were conducted intermittently (e.g., the magazine ad ran in February, June, and July; billboards ran 4 weeks in March-April).

The purposes of this observational study are to assess: 1) effectiveness of LMFB in motivating people to visit the LMFB website, 2) effectiveness of the website in retaining visitors’ interest, and 3) lessons learned to guide future campaign implementation.

Methods: Campaign effectiveness was defined as the number of visits to the LMFB website homepage, as calculated by Site Catalyst, a web analytics software program. To put this into perspective, this number was compared to number of visits to select CDC webpages from the target DMA for the same time period.

Effectiveness of the website in retaining interest was assessed by examining the number of people who left the homepage without visiting additional pages, also calculated by Site Catalyst. Patterns of impressions and website visits were examined to identify lessons learned.

Results: The 7 month LMFB pilot-test resulted in more than 31 million impressions; with approximately 80% from paid media, 11% from earned media, and 9% from partners’ promotion.

The pilot-test generated 26,851 visits to the LMFB homepage; 58% from the targeted DMA, a total of 85% from the state. Other CDC websites had less then 1% of their visits from the target DMA during the pilot-test period. Visits to the homepage peaked in periods where ads were running in multiple channels; the impact of digital ads is easiest to track, but ads in traditional media (print, radio, billboard) contribute to impressions and message repetition that leads to action.

Only 17% of homepage visits resulted in visitors viewing another page on the website.

Conclusion: LMFB pilot-test was successful in driving traffic to the LMFB website; nearly 60% came from the targeted DMA. The additional visits from the state are likely due to spread of LMFB materials since the only 15% of visits were from outside the state. Paid media was an essential part of this pilot-test and use of multiple channels increased effectiveness. However, the LMFB homepage was less successful in enticing visitors to visit additional pages on the site, suggesting further improvements to the homepage are necessary.


Disclosure: T. Brady, None; M. Lewis, None; C. Cartwright, None; A. Hvizdak, None; S. Lasker, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Brady T, Lewis M, Cartwright C, Hvizdak A, Lasker S. Reach and Effectiveness of a Health Communications Campaign Promoting Self Management Education: Results of a Pilot Test of the Learn More. Feel Better. Campaign [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reach-and-effectiveness-of-a-health-communications-campaign-promoting-self-management-education-results-of-a-pilot-test-of-the-learn-more-feel-better-campaign/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reach-and-effectiveness-of-a-health-communications-campaign-promoting-self-management-education-results-of-a-pilot-test-of-the-learn-more-feel-better-campaign/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology