ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 146

Rates of Lipid Testing and Statin Prescription Filling Among U.S. Medicaid Recipients with SLE, 2007-2010

Sarah Chen1, Michael A. Fischer2, Hongshu Guan3, Medha Barbhaiya4 and Karen H. Costenbader5, 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 2Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 5Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: cardiovascular disease and lipids, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster I: Diagnosis, Management and Treatment Strategies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Given high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks in SLE patients, lipid testing and statin prescription are widely advocated for those with elevated risks. We examined rates of lipid testing and statin prescription filling among SLE patients within Medicaid in recent years.  

Methods: Within Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), containing billing claims from 2007-10 for Medicaid patients from the 29 most populated US states, we identified patients aged 18-65 years with prevalent SLE (>3 ICD-9 codes of 710.0, >30 days apart). We required 6 months of continuous Medicaid enrollment (baseline period) prior to the 3rdcode (index date). Baseline data included age, year, sex, race/ethnicity, US region of residence. Subjects were followed from index date until death, Medicaid disenrollment or end of follow-up (12/31/2010). Within claims, CPT codes identified lipid testing and NDC codes identified statin prescription filling. We calculated rates per 1000 person-years for lipid testing and statin prescription filling, and rate ratios (with 95% CIs) to compare rates between sociodemographic groups. We tested for trends in lipid testing and statin prescription rates over time using Cochrane Armitage tests.    

Results: Of 37,999 patients with prevalent SLE, 93% were female. Mean age was 41.2 (+ 12.1) years. Race/ethnicity were: 42% Black, 36% White, 16% Hispanic, 2% Native American. Mean follow-up was 19.4 (+ 12.7) months; 746 patients died. In the entire cohort, 11,969 patients (32%) had >1 lipid testing and 6885 (18%) had >1 filled statin prescription. Lipid testing did not differ by sex, but statin prescription was slightly more frequent among men than women. The highest rates of lipid testing were seen among Hispanic and Asian patients (vs. White), older patients (ages 55-65 vs. younger), those living in the West (vs. other regions), and those receiving corticosteroids (vs. not). (Table) The highest rates for filled statin prescriptions were observed in older patients (ages 55-65 vs. younger), and those receiving corticosteroids. Black and Native American patients had lower rates of both lipid testing and statin prescription (vs. White patients). No geographic variation in statin prescribing was seen. Rates of both lipid testing (from 235.1 [227.3, 243.2] to 474.6 [450.9, 499.5] per 1000 person-years, p trend <0.0001) and statin prescription (from 81.7 [77.7, 86.0] to 286.4 [268.4, 305.5] per 1000 person-years, p trend <0.0001) increased significantly between 2007-10.

Conclusion: In this large SLE cohort, 32% of patients had >1 lipid testing and 18% filled > 1 statin prescription between 2007-10. Rates of both lipid testing and statin prescription increased significantly during this time. Rates were higher among older patients and those on corticosteroids. Given high CVD and mortality risks among Black and Native American SLE patients, it is noteworthy that these groups had low rates of lipid testing and statin prescriptions. 

Table. Rate Ratios for Lipid Testing and Statin Prescription Filling among Medicaid patients with SLE in the U.S., 2007-2010

 

Lipid Testing*

Statin Prescriptions**

Patient Group

Rate Ratio

95% CI

Rate Ratio

95% CI

Sex

Female

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Male

0.92

0.85-1.01

1.27

1.15-1.41

Race/Ethnicity

White

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Black

0.97

0.92-1.02

0.85

0.80-0.91

Hispanic

1.35

1.27-1.43

1.01

0.92-1.10

Asian

1.63

1.45-1.83

1.17

0.99-1.38

Native

0.78

0.61-0.98

0.70

0.50-0.97

Age

 

18-34

0.64

0.60-0.68

0.22

0.20-0.24

35-44

0.81

0.76-0.86

0.42

0.39-0.46

45-54

0.93

0.87-0.98

0.73

0.68-0.79

55-65

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

US Region

West

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Northeast

0.77

0.73-0.82

0.99

0.90-1.08

South

0.77

0.73-0.82

0.96

0.89-1.04

Midwest

0.65

0.61-0.69

1.09

0.99-1.19

Receiving Corticosteroids

Yes

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

No

0.41

0.39-0.43

0.42

0.39-0.45

Calendar year

2007

0.50

0.46-0.53

0.29

0.26-0.31

2010

Ref.

Ref.

Reference

Reference

*CPT codes for lipid screening (80061, 82465, 83700, 83701, 83715, 83716, 83721, 84478, 83718 (Morrato EH, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2010).

**NDC codes used to identify statin use (Bateman BT, BMJ, 2015).


Disclosure: S. Chen, None; M. A. Fischer, Alosa Foundation, 5,CVS-Caremark, Otsuka America, 9; H. Guan, None; M. Barbhaiya, None; K. H. Costenbader, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chen S, Fischer MA, Guan H, Barbhaiya M, Costenbader KH. Rates of Lipid Testing and Statin Prescription Filling Among U.S. Medicaid Recipients with SLE, 2007-2010 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rates-of-lipid-testing-and-statin-prescription-filling-among-u-s-medicaid-recipients-with-sle-2007-2010/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rates-of-lipid-testing-and-statin-prescription-filling-among-u-s-medicaid-recipients-with-sle-2007-2010/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology