ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 901

Rate of Serum Uric Acid (SUA) Assessment in Gout Patients Treated with Urate-Lowering Therapy: Treating to Target?

Robert Morlock1, David M. Kern2, Ozgur Tunceli2, Siting Zhou2, Laura Horne3, Sulabha Ramachandran3 and Hyon K. Choi4, 14939 Directors Place, Ardea Biosciences, San Diego, CA, 2HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, 3AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, 4Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Access to care, gout and hyperuricemia

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research: Risk Assessment and Outcomes of Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis and is caused by chronic hyperuricemia, leading to urate crystal deposition disease and subsequent intermittent flares and tophi development. ACR guidelines recommend treating to target SUA levels (<6 mg/dL or, in some cases, <5 mg/dL as needed to control signs/symptoms). This study aimed to describe overall rates of SUA testing and differences in patient characteristics, comorbidities, treatments, and flare rates by SUA testing status.

Methods: Gout patients treated with urate-lowering therapy (ULT) were identified between Feb 1, 2011 and Jan 31, 2012 from the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment. Index event was considered to be the earliest of the following: a prescription for ULT; or a gout diagnosis (ICD-9 274.xx) or a claim for colchicine with ULT therapy in the year prior. Patients with <12 months pre- and post-index enrollment or with a diagnosis of cancer, evidence of hematologic cancer, tumor lysis syndrome, Lesch-Nyhan syndrome or juvenile gout, familial Mediterranean fever, or pregnancy in the pre- or postindex periods were excluded. Patient demographics and comorbid conditions were captured during the 12-month pre-index period. SUA laboratory testing, treatment characteristics, and overall gout control (SUA ≤6 mg/dL, no flares, no tophi) were examined during the 12 month post-index period. Target SUA level was ≤6 mg/dL. Flares were defined during the post-index period as either a claim for colchicine, or a healthcare visit recording gout together with ≥1 of the following within 1 week: joint aspiration/injection (corticosteroids), prescription of NSAIDs, corticosteroids, adrenocorticotropic hormone, or IL-1 antagonist.

Results: 50,602 ULT-treated patients met inclusion criteria (average age, 59; 82% male). During follow-up, 90% of patients received allopurinol, 6% febuxostat, and 4% probenecid. SUA testing occurred in 47% of patients during 1-year follow-up. Those with SUA testing were younger (57 vs. 61 years) and had higher rates of colchicine use (23% vs 13%), hyperlipidemia (64% vs. 59%), and chronic kidney disease (15% vs 13%) compared to those without testing. Patients without SUA testing had higher rates of cardiac-related comorbidities: coronary artery disease (21% vs 17% in those with testing), angina (21% vs 16%), and peripheral vascular disease (10% vs 8%). A higher proportion of patients seen by a rheumatologist had testing compared with those not visiting a rheumatologist (75% vs 44%, respectively). Among patients with available SUA results (n=6649), 47% of subjects had SUA levels ≤6 mg/dL, and 30% achieved overall gout control.

Conclusion: Guidelines describe treating to target SUA as appropriate care. This study finds <50% of all gout patients treated with a ULT have SUA assessed at any time during a 12-month period. Patients most likely to have SUA assessments are younger, have more flares, or visit a rheumatologist. In patients with SUA assessment, <50% achieve SUA goal and less than a third achieve overall gout control. These findings suggest that contemporary gout care is suboptimal, leaving considerable room for improvement.


Disclosure:

R. Morlock,

Ardea Biosciences, Inc.,

1,

Ardea Biosciences, Inc.,

3;

D. M. Kern,

Healthcore, Inc.,

3;

O. Tunceli,

Healthcore, Inc.,

3;

S. Zhou,

Healthcore, Inc.,

3;

L. Horne,

AstraZeneca,

1,

AstraZeneca,

3;

S. Ramachandran,

AstraZeneca,

1,

AstraZeneca,

3;

H. K. Choi,

Takeda,

5,

AstraZeneca,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rate-of-serum-uric-acid-sua-assessment-in-gout-patients-treated-with-urate-lowering-therapy-treating-to-target/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology