ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1069

Racial Differences In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients’ Treatment Preferences: A Two-Site Study

Ernest R. Vina1, Tammy O. Utset2, Michael J. Hannon3, Nicole Roberts4, Christopher M. Masi5 and C. Kent Kwoh6, 1Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh and VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Rheumatology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 3Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 4Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 5Internal Medicine, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, 6School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: decision analysis and treatment options, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services II & III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Racial disparities in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) exist, with African-American (AA) patients experiencing higher lupus damage scores and disease activity than white (WH) patients.  Racial differences in SLE patients’ treatment preferences may contribute to these differences and are only partly understood. The goals of the study are to determine whether there are racial differences in willingness to: 1) receive cyclophosphamide (CYC) when physician recommended or 2) participate in a research clinical trial (RCT) involving an experimental medication among SLE patients.  We also seek to determine which demographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics impact racial differences in either measure of treatment preference.

Methods:

Data from 163 AA and 180 WH SLE patients recruited from two university clinics were evaluated.  Structured interviews and chart reviews were conducted to determine socio-demographic characteristics, clinical factors, perceptions of medications and disease, and beliefs and attitudes towards providers and the healthcare system.  Logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the impact of patient characteristics, including race, on preferences for treatment.

Results:

AAs, compared to WHs, were less likely to have more than a high-school graduate degree (p=0.004), be employed (p=0.024), have higher income (p<0.001), have private insurance (p<0.001) and be married (<0.001).  Among patients who had never received CYC (n=293), 62.9% AAs, compared to 87.6% WHs, were willing to receive the medication (p<0.001).  This difference persisted (OR 0.37 [95% CI, 0.16-0.87]) after adjusting for socio-demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and perceptions about CYC and physicians.  Income ($30,001-50,000 vs. <$10,000, OR 4.07 [95% CI, 1.15-14.33]; >$50,000 vs. <$10,000, OR 4.45 [95% CI, 1.24-15.97]) and higher perception of CYC effectiveness (OR 1.41 [95% CI, 1.25-1.59]) were other significant determinants of willingness to receive CYC in the adjusted model.

Among patients who had never participated in a RCT (n=326), 64.9% AAs, compared to 84.3% WHs were willing to do so (p<0.001).  This difference persisted (OR 0.41 [95% CI, 0.20-0.83]) after adjusting for socio-demographics, clinical variables related to SLE and patients’ perceptions of physicians.  SLE damage index score (4 vs. 0, OR 0.23 [95% CI, 0.07-0.74]), current number of immunosuppressive medications (1 vs. 0, OR 3.65 [95% CI, 1.14-11.73]; ≥2 vs. 0, OR 5.45 [95% CI, 1.62-18.30]) and higher trust in physicians (OR 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00-1.08]) were also independently associated with willingness to participate in a RCT in the adjusted model.

Conclusion:

Variations in lupus patients’ treatment preferences are associated with income, medication history, perceived medication effectiveness and trust in physicians.  Race remains an independent determinant of preferences after adjusting for these variables.  While some factors related to racial differences in patient preferences are relatively fixed, other factors, including medication beliefs and trust in providers, are potentially modifiable and could be addressed to reduce outcome disparities.


Disclosure:

E. R. Vina,
None;

T. O. Utset,
None;

M. J. Hannon,
None;

N. Roberts,
None;

C. M. Masi,
None;

C. K. Kwoh,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-treatment-preferences-a-two-site-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology