ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0478

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in DMARD Use and in Medicare Part B-Covered Options Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Late-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis

ashkan ara1, John FitzGerald2 and Susan Ettner2, 1UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA, 2UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Disparities, Medicare, Pharmacoepidemiology, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0470–0505) Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs can substantially improve the quality of life for Medicare beneficiaries with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, racial and ethnic disparities in their use, particularly those covered by Part B, have not been well studied in this population. Medicare defines any drug costing over $670 per patient per month as a “specialty” drug, which encompasses all biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs. We examined racial and ethnic differences in 12-month use of any DMARD, specialty DMARDs, and the Part B-covered subset in a large cohort of Medicare enrollees with late-onset RA.

Methods: We used 20% Sample Medicare claims from 2016-2020 to establish an incident cohort of late-onset RA, defined as ≥2 outpatient ICD-10 RA codes 7-365 days apart following a 12-month washout. Eligible beneficiaries were ≥65 years old, continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A/B/D, and had no other indication for DMARD use. Outcomes included receipt of (1) any DMARD, (2) specialty DMARDs, and (3) Part B-covered subset within 12 months of case identification. The main regressor was race and ethnicity (non‑Hispanic White reference). Covariates included age, sex, and low‑income subsidy status (LIS). We performed multivariable logistic regressions for each outcome, incorporating calendar‑month and calendar‑year fixed effects, and reporting adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs.

Results: Among 39,706 beneficiaries with incident late-onset RA (Figure), 14,190 (35.7%) received any DMARD, 1,906 (4.8%) a specialty DMARD, and 1,363 (3.4%) a Part B–covered specialty DMARD within 12 months (Table 1). The most common first DMARDs included:- Any DMARD: methotrexate (6,154), hydroxychloroquine (5,229), and leflunomide (850); – Specialty: abatacept (278; both formulations), certolizumab (274; both formulations), and infliximab (259); – Part B-covered subset: certolizumab (270), infliximab (255), and abatacept (253).In multivariable models (Table 2) Black patients (aOR: 0.92) had significantly lower odds of receiving any DMARD than non-Hispanic White patients. Race and ethnicity were not associated with differential receipt of specialty DMARDs. However, in the Part B-covered subset, Black (aOR 0.78), Hispanic (aOR 0.75), and Other (aOR 0.63) patients had significantly lower odds of receiving these agents compared to non-Hispanic White patients.Also, LIS was associated with 14%, 15%, and 67% lower odds of any DMARD use, specialty DMARD use, and the Part B-covered subset, respectively. Moreover, each additional year of age was associated with 4%, 5%, and 6% lower odds of any DMARD use, specialty DMARD use, and Part B therapy use, respectively (with mild nonlinearity modeled via age²). Furthermore, female sex was associated with 13% lower odds of specialty DMARD use.

Conclusion: Part B-covered DMARDs exhibited the most pronounced disparities: Black, Hispanic, and Other non-White patients were 22-37% less likely to receive these therapies. This gap is particularly concerning because, despite the inconvenience of office or infusion-center administration, Part B agents carry lower coinsurance than Part D’s specialty tier, representing a key cost-saving opportunity that non-White beneficiaries may be missing.

Supporting image 1Figure: Flow diagram depicting the establishment of a cohort with incident late-onset RA among Medicare beneficiaries (2016-2020).

Supporting image 2Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the included patients, overall and by receipt of first DMARD (any), first specialty DMARD, and first Part B-covered specialty DMARD (i.e. office- or infusion-center–administered) within 12 months of case identification.

Supporting image 3Table 2. Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) from multivariable logistic regression models examining the association of race and ethnicity, sex, age, and low‐income subsidy status (LIS: proxy for socioeconomic status) with (A) any DMARD use, (B) specialty DMARD use, and (C) Part B-covered specialty DMARD use within 12 months of case identification. Four model specifications are shown per outcome: Model 1 (race and ethnicity only), Model 2 (+ LIS), Model 3 (all covariates except LIS), and Model 4 (full model). Significant findings (p < 0.05) are indicated by an asterisk.


Disclosures: a. ara: None; J. FitzGerald: None; S. Ettner: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

ara a, FitzGerald J, Ettner S. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in DMARD Use and in Medicare Part B-Covered Options Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Late-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-and-ethnic-disparities-in-dmard-use-and-in-medicare-part-b-covered-options-among-medicare-beneficiaries-with-late-onset-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-and-ethnic-disparities-in-dmard-use-and-in-medicare-part-b-covered-options-among-medicare-beneficiaries-with-late-onset-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology