ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1696

Quantitative Evaluation of Dermal Atrophy by High-Resolution Ultrasonography, Comparing Between Patients Under Long-Term Treatment with Prednisolone or Methylprednisolone

Tim Pottel1, Christoph Schäfer2 and Gernot Keyßer2, 1Universitätsklinikum Kröllwitz, Department of Internal Medicine II, 06114 Halle (Saale), Germany, 2Universitätsklinikum Kröllwitz, Department of Internal Medicine II, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: glucocorticoids, prednisolone, prednisone, Renal disease, rheumatoid arthritis, treatment and transplantation

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Safety II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The katabolic effects of a systemic treatment with glucocorticoids can lead to a progressive atrophy of the skin. Clinical observation suggests a more pronounced effect of methylprednisolone compared with prednisolone. Therefore, a study was undertaken to correlate the cumulative doses of the respective steroids with the skin thickness measured by high-resolution sonography, comparing patients with rheumatic disorders receiving long-term prednisolone and patients with renal transplants taking methylprednisolone.

Methods: The study included 92 patients, 47 of them after renal transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy with methylprednisolone, 45 with rheumatic diseases and prednisolone treatment, including 29 cases with rheumatoid arthritis. The cumulative steroid doses were recorded by chart review. Patients were included, if they had at least two years of glucocorticoid treatment, had a complete documentation of their steroid intake at least every three months and were free of relevant dermal diseases. The measurement of dermal thickness was performed by high-resolution ultrasound, using an 18 MHz probe, at three standardized locations at volar and dorsal forearm.

Results: There were no differences in the cumulative steroid doses between both groups,  after adjusting for  equivalent doses. However, patients receiving methylprednisolone revealed a significantly more pronounced dermal atrophy, compared with patients taking prednisolone. (mean dermal thickness 0,77 mm, standard error 0,023 in group with prednisolone treatment; 0,65 mm, standard error 0,018 in methylprednisolone group)(t-test; p=5*10-4). By Pearsonxs correlation we identified a statistical interaction between the mean dermal thickness and type of glucocorticoid used (Pearsonxs r = -0,41; p=2*10-5). Multiple regression analysis revealed, that methylprednisolone had a more pronounced negative influence on skin atrophy than prednisolone (regression coefficient β= -0,15; p= 2,3*10-7). The association between cumulative dose of the last two years and degree of atrophy was significantly represented by β= -0,011; p=0,035, however only significant for cumulative steroids of last or last half year in methylprednisolone.

Conclusion: In our study, the long-term use of methylprednisolone was associated with a more pronounced dermal atrophy compared with prednisolone, particularly prominent in the last half year before data collection by measurement . The katabolic effects of methylprednisolone may be more pronounced that those of prednisolone, even after the adjustment for equivalent doses.

 

 


Disclosure:

T. Pottel,
None;

C. Schäfer,
None;

G. Keyßer,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantitative-evaluation-of-dermal-atrophy-by-high-resolution-ultrasonography-comparing-between-patients-under-long-term-treatment-with-prednisolone-or-methylprednisolone/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology