ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2309

Quantifying The Gap Between General Population Guidelines and Expert Opinion For Cardiovascular Risk Management In Rheumatic Disease Patients

Katherine P. Liao1, Jonathan Brown2, Jonathan S. Coblyn3, Paul Cohen2, Jorge Plutzky2 and Daniel H. Solomon4, 1Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, Clinical, Lipids, rheumatic disease and statins

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: ARHP Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects: Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

Cardiovascular (CV) risk is higher among rheumatic disease patients than the general population.  However, CV risk management guidelines calibrated for the rheumatic disease population do not currently exist.  At our academic medical center, we recently established an interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Rheumatology clinic aimed at optimizing CV care.  The objective of this study was to characterize and quantify the change in management recommended for rheumatic disease patients after formal evaluation by cardiologists.

Methods:

We studied patients referred to the CV Rheumatology clinic for cardiovascular risk assessment from January 2012 when the clinic began to April 2013.  The clinic is held once a month in the rheumatology clinic with patients referred from the rheumatology practice, staffed by 3 board certified cardiologists.  Patient demographic information was obtained from the medical record.  CV risk factors and change in management was assessed by manual chart review of cardiologists’ notes.  The following were considered changes in management: (1) change in medication therapy (defined as starting, increasing dose, or switching CV related medications); or (2) further work-up to assess risk (e.g. further laboratory studies to stratify CV risk, stress testing or referral to a cardiac subspecialty).  The Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) Guidelines were applied to the subset of subjects who were recommended to start or increase statin dose.  The ATP III Guidelines specifies low density lipoprotein (LDL) goal levels for patients based on number of traditional CV risk factors and 10 year risk for heart disease according to the Framingham Risk Score. 

Results:

We studied 31 patients referred for CV risk assessment.  The mean age was 57 yrs and 77% were female.  The most common underlying rheumatic diseases in the CVR clinic were RA (38.7%) and SLE (25.8%).  Hypertension (51.6%) was the most prevalent CV risk factor at presentation, followed by hyperlipidemia (45.2%).  Of the patients seen, 83.9% were recommended a change in their current CV management.  The most commonly recommended change or intervention was starting or increasing statin therapy (35.5%), change in anti-HTN therapy (16.1%) or stress testing (12.9%).  Among the subjects recommended to start or intensify statin therapy, 63.6% would have been considered already at target LDL according to ATP III Guidelines. 

Conclusion:

We observed that the majority of rheumatic disease patients referred to the CV Rheumatology clinic had a change in CV risk management after evaluation by a cardiologist.   Recommended LDL targets by cardiologists at our center were lower than ATP III guidelines, leading to intensification of statin therapy.  These data suggest a need for CV risk management optimization in patients with rheumatic diseases.


Disclosure:

K. P. Liao,
None;

J. Brown,
None;

J. S. Coblyn,

CVS,

5;

P. Cohen,
None;

J. Plutzky,
None;

D. H. Solomon,

Lilly, Amgen, CORRONA,

2,

Lilly, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer,

6,

Lilly, BMS, Novartis,

9.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantifying-the-gap-between-general-population-guidelines-and-expert-opinion-for-cardiovascular-risk-management-in-rheumatic-disease-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology