ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1936

Quality Of Care In Patients At Risk For Pulmonary Involvement:  Assessment Of Pulmonary Screening In Systemic Sclerosis and Myositis Patients In a General Rheumatology Clinic

Michael G. Indelicato1, Janet E. Lewis2, Vincent J. Giuliano3 and Donald L. Kimpel4, 1Rheumatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 2Rheumatology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, 3University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 4Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Myositis, Pulmonary Involvement, quality measures and quality of care, Scleredema

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: As a quality assessment tool to evaluate patient care in a general Rheumatology Clinic, we determined the frequency of screening for pulmonary hypertension and interstitial lung involvement in a subset of patients at high risk.   Involvement of the respiratory system is common in Systemic Sclerosis (SS) and Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis (PM/DM). Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) can lead to significant morbidity. These complications are now the leading cause of death in systemic sclerosis. The prevalence of pulmonary involvement in PM/DM is variable, but has been reported to be close to 50%. ILD is a negative prognostic factor in these patients. General medical opinion is that Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs) are suitable as a screening tool, but that a High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scan is crucial for the initial diagnosis of ILD. In addition, an echocardiogram is recommended to evaluate for PAH. However, there are no uniform guidelines for screening and the frequency with which these studies should be repeated. Published data suggests that screening assessments are not done routinely, so to establish a baseline for quality of care,we determined the frequency of pulmonary evaluation in our clinic population.

Methods: All patients were seen in our outpatient Rheumatology clinic from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011. Patients were identified based on diagnosis codes, and diagnoses confirmed by chart review. Charts were reviewed to determine if screening for ILD and PAH had been performed within 24 months of the index visit. ILD was classified by FVC < 70% or suggestive findings on CT imaging. If PAH was suggested by either decreased DLCO on PFTs or increased RVSP on echocardiogram, a right heart catheterization (RHC) was needed to confirm the presence of PAH.

Results: Of the 91 patients categorized, 44 had a diagnosis of SS, while 47 carried a diagnosis of PM/DM. Of the 44 patients with SS, nearly all patients were screened for ILD with PFTs (38/44, 86%) and PAH with echocardiogram (40/44,  91%). 16 had ILD and 10 had PAH. A total of 4 patients had both ILD and PAH. All 10 patients with PAH were confirmed with RHC. All patients with ILD had a HRCT at baseline.  Of the 47 patients with PM/DM, about 61% (29/47) of the patients were screened for ILD with PFTs and just 28% (13/47) were screened for PAH with echocardiogram.  18 had ILD, while only 1 had PAH, confirmed on RHC. The 1 patient with PAH, also had ILD. All patients with ILD did have a HRCT obtained at baseline.

Conclusion: In our SS patients, 86% and 91% or our patients were screened for ILD and PAH respectively.  For patients with PM/DM, although our screening percentage for ILD was lower compared to the SS group, the high frequency of ILD noted in PM/DM patients in prior studies suggests that routine screening is warranted. Only 28% of our PM/DM patients were screened for PAH. The association of PAH with PM/DM is not as well documented, however it remains good practice that patients with progressive dyspnea despite optimal treatment for ILD, should undergo evaluation for PAH.   Future studies will assess the ongoing screening patterns, and address the rate of disease progression and the incidence of new onset ILD or PAH in this patient population.


Disclosure:

M. G. Indelicato,
None;

J. E. Lewis,
None;

V. J. Giuliano,
None;

D. L. Kimpel,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quality-of-care-in-patients-at-risk-for-pulmonary-involvement-assessment-of-pulmonary-screening-in-systemic-sclerosis-and-myositis-patients-in-a-general-rheumatology-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology