ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 308

Quality Control of Antinuclear Antibody Detection by Indirect Immunofluorescence and Flow Cytometry-based Recombinant Antigen Assays

Konrad Dziamski1 and Andras Perl 1, 1SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-Smith, Immunofluorescence, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Measures Of Healthcare Quality Poster I: Testing, Screening, & Treating

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Indirect immunofluorescence (IF) is the recommended initial test for detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by the American College of Rheumatology (Ann Rheum. Dis 69:1420-2), (Clin. Immunol. 124:18-21). Because the staining pattern does not identify the responsible autoantibody, additional testing using Flow Cytometry-based Recombinant Antigen Assays (FCA) is required. We were interested in assessing the correlation of this method for ANA detection with the results of specific autoantibodies identified by FCA at our institution between 2012-2019.

Methods: 5,474 instances of simultaneous testing with ANA by IF and FCA were identified. All tests were performed in house (SUNY Upstate, Syracuse, NY). Positive autoantibody detection by FCA for dsDNA, anti-Smith, centromere, histone, RNP, Scl-70, SSA, and SSB were individually compared to results of ANA by IF.  Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values were assessed by 2-tailed Chi-square tests using GraphPad software.

Results: Of 396 positive dsDNA results, 223/396 were associated with a homogeneous pattern and 173/396 were not (sensitivity: 56%; p< 0.0007 relative to anti-Smith, p< 0.0021 relative to RNP and p< 0.0001 to all others). Anti-Smith antibodies had association with speckled pattern in 171/245 instances (70%) while 74/245 (30%) did not (statistical significance only achieved in comparison to dsDNA (p< 0.0007 and centromere (0.0009)). There were 562 instances of multiple positive autoantibodies detected by FCA associated with positive IF, and an additional 17 instances of multiple positive autoantibodies associated with negative IF.

Conclusion: This analysis of lupus patients suggests that quality control issues likely exist when IF is used for ANA screening given the high number of negative homogeneous and speckled patterns when compared to positive dsDNA and Sm autoantibody detection by FCA.

Detection of ANA by IF in patients with SLE that have positive anti-DNA or anti-Sm antibodies.


Disclosure: K. Dziamski, None; A. Perl, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dziamski K, Perl A. Quality Control of Antinuclear Antibody Detection by Indirect Immunofluorescence and Flow Cytometry-based Recombinant Antigen Assays [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quality-control-of-antinuclear-antibody-detection-by-indirect-immunofluorescence-and-flow-cytometry-based-recombinant-antigen-assays/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quality-control-of-antinuclear-antibody-detection-by-indirect-immunofluorescence-and-flow-cytometry-based-recombinant-antigen-assays/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology