ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2013

Quality Appraisal of Educational Websites on Osteoporosis and Bone Health

Maria A. Lopez-Olivo1, Noha Abdel-Wahab2,3, Abhinav Dodeja4, Gregory Pratt5 and Maria E. Suarez-Almazor2, 1Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 2The Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 3Rheumatology & Rehabilitation Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, 4The University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, 5Research Medical Library, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bone density, Education, osteopenia, osteoporosis and website, patient

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Education (ARHP): Education/Community Programs

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Osteoporosis, like many other chronic diseases, can have better outcomes when informed patients get involved in self-management, resulting in better ourtcomes.  Bone health education publicly available through the Internet, if evidence-based and unbiased, could help patients to deal with issues such as decision making, maintaining healthy lifestyles, using medications correctly, and improving their communication with health professionals. The current study aimed to assess the quality of websites providing bone health-related information on the Internet.

Methods: We performed an environmental scan of the currently available osteoporosis and bone health patient education information on the World Wide Web. The sample websites were identified by using three separate search tools: Google Advanced, Bing, and Ask.com. We used the phrases “bone health” and “osteoporosis” in titles of Web pages and reviewed the first 100 results in each of the following domains: .gov, .org, & .com, plus links to 50 .edu websites. Only patient education websites were included. Websites that were part of clinical guidelines were excluded. Two independent investigators collected data regarding: information provided (accuracy and completeness), design, disclosures and references provided. Literacy was evaluated using the Flesch Grade Level readability formula.

Results: We identified 29 websites (92% non-profitable).  Most websites were focused on risks factors of osteoporosis, preventive measures, screening recommendations, and topics to discuss with the physician. All websites provided adequate information describing treatment options; however, only 10.3% had information addressing duration of treatment, what happens when treatment stops, and the benefits and risks of various treatments. Only 50% of the websites had their content updated to 2014.  Reading levels ranged from 7.8 to 14.8 (higher than the recommended 6-grade level). Ninety percent of the sites were static websites with no interactive features in their design; 94% were linear. Only 33% included an adequate disclosure statement and 25% cited their sources of information to support their content.

Conclusion: Websites with information about bone health and osteoporosis commonly fail to report adequate disclosure statements and sources of information. While they commonly present information about initial treatment choices, most fail to address risk-benefit issues, and common barriers than can occur throughout the course of the disease. In addition, most websites are written at a 9-grade level or above, rendering them unsuitable for low-literacy populations.


Disclosure:

M. A. Lopez-Olivo,
None;

N. Abdel-Wahab,
None;

A. Dodeja,
None;

G. Pratt,
None;

M. E. Suarez-Almazor,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quality-appraisal-of-educational-websites-on-osteoporosis-and-bone-health/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology